CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
60% Yes |
40% No |
60% Yes |
40% No |
See how support for each position on “CRISPR Technology” has changed over time for 2.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “CRISPR Technology” has changed over time for 2.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MMD6HL4wks4W
Yes, but only in terms of preventing disease, disorders, and significant health issues. This should not be applied to physical appearance.
@9NXFDC6 6 days6D
Human genetic modification should be instantly banned at the state and local levels, and eventually at the federal via constitutional amendment.
@9NVSGHT1wk1W
Yes, but they should only regulate the price so that those with hereditary diseases can access it easily.
@9NS8J5G1wk1W
No. But violation of law should permanently put any entity abusing the technology and/or using it unethically out of business immediately.
@9NQRP2R1wk1W
Yes, but the government should keep an eye out for unethical research that can potentially lead to consequences.
@9MLSFSS4wks4W
As long as this doesn't go to the eugenics route then its good
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
