Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
61% Yes |
39% No |
61% Yes |
39% No |
See how support for each position on “Carpooling and Shared Transportation” has changed over time for 576 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Carpooling and Shared Transportation” has changed over time for 576 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9PB2DLC 16hrs16H
Yes, and incentivize active transportation as well.
@9P9DXRG1 day1D
No, but the government should offer some miniscule break to those companies that do it for their workers.
@9P7MH8N3 days3D
Government should be providing free, reliable, accessible public transportation that isn’t dependent upon the fossil fuel industry.
@9P3JCM74 days4D
Local communities should encourage better, more environmentally-friendly local travel.
@9NLF3PX2wks2W
No, but make the carpooling market more competitive than it is
@9NG845V2wks2W
Yes, but the person in charge shall check for potential dangerous passenger
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.