Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.
49% Yes |
51% No |
49% Yes |
51% No |
See how support for each position on “Social Media Regulation” has changed over time for 12.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Social Media Regulation” has changed over time for 12.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9K99V29 1mo1MO
Yes, as long as it's only shared with regulators and not the public except in the cases of harm or abuse
@9MNGKL24wks4W
No, but if it's a threat to the common safety or the nation, then allow it.
@9NW325F7 days7D
Tech companies' algorithms have complex, unresearched effects on the people and should be monitored by independent teams that are staffed by a diverse set of people who have humanity-centered goals. Tech companies often do not consider the impact of their technologies on smaller, marginalized population since the nature of technology is creating benefits that increases the average person's life quality. Regulators of technology will have an almost impossible, but necessary role of safeguarding people's current life quality and striking a delicate balance between doing what is right (obligatory) and what is good (desirable, not necessarily obligatory). Companies should share their algorithms and methodologies on a case-by-case basis, as deemed necessary by the regulatory committee.
@9NVYZDY7 days7D
Only if the tech company is involved in weapons, artificial intelligence or security. In medical research, economic and social networks no
@9NVWVNG7 days7D
As long as regulators don't have any relations with competitor companies and they're also unable to trade on stock market
@9NS8J5G1wk1W
No. But if large tech companies are intentionally targeting minors, knowingly jeopardizing their health, they should be heavily penalized - a second offense should result in penalties so harsh they likely can not stay in business - and any awards won, should be distributed to programs which encourage minors to get out and exercise or play sports or anything NOT involving looking at a phone or tablet.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Social Media Regulation” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.