In some countries, traffic fines are adjusted based on the offender’s income - a system known as "day fines" - to ensure that penalties are equally impactful regardless of wealth. This approach aims to create fairness by making fines proportionate to the driver’s ability to pay, rather than applying the same flat rate to everyone. Proponents argue that income-based fines make penalties more equitable, as flat fines may be insignificant to the wealthy but burdensome to low-income individuals. Opponents argue that penalties should be consistent for all drivers to maintain fairness under the law, and that income-based fines could create resentment or be difficult to enforce.
Response rates from 5.7k America voters.
34% Yes |
66% No |
34% Yes |
66% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 5.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 5.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B5RT93J4wks4W
Not on the driver's income level, but maybe on the class or cost/value of the vehicle involved. Example: an equivalent speeding violation would cost more for a driver of a ferrari than it would for a driver of a honda.
@B5VWM932wks2W
There shouldn't be a monetary fine, rather an actual jail time or course that needs to be completed. Financial punishments would be too hard to regulate. Someone may have no reported income so they might not have a fine large enough to deter a repeat offense.
@B4RTXBZ3mos3MO
Fines for low income can be life altering Fines for rich are a suggestion YES, it should be proportional to what that fine would be for low income households or it won't change anyones behaviour to laws ever.
@ProudJew 1wk1W
Penalties should be based on actual harm and severity, not income. However, the current system creates disproportionate punishment for the poor through cascading consequences (insurance suspension, impoundment, inability to fight tickets). Reform should focus on eliminating poverty-based license suspensions and providing payment plans/community service options rather than income-based fines that could be gamed by the wealthy.
@B5XR5P51wk1W
No, that will only allow police departments to financially take advantage of higher-income drivers and pose a higher risk of low-income drivers on the road.
@B5X29HV2wks2W
Yes, speeding & any other traffic violation should result in 1% of the persons annual salary. $10K = $100 fine. $20K = $200 fine. 30K = $300 fine. Etc.
@B5WWGRX2wks2W
Yes, do it if the driver is ALWAYS going over the speed limit in my city streets. And even if they're using their smartphones while driving, PENALIZE THEM.
@8PZG6MW 2wks2W
Yes, but within reason. Not necessarily a sliding scale, but a higher percentage for high-net-worth individuals on repeat offenses. It should also increase for repeated offenses in a certain time frame in general, but not to the point of financially locking low-income individuals.
Join in on the most popular conversations.