A Presidential pardon is an official forgiveness of a crime, preventing or mitigating legal consequences for the individual(s) granted it. The January 6 Capitol attack involved individuals who were charged with various offenses in connection with the breach of the U.S. Capitol. Proponents argue that pardons could help heal national divisions, noting that many participants were motivated by political beliefs and may have been misled. They see pardons as an act of mercy that could reduce tension. Opponents argue that granting pardons would undermine accountability, signal that politically motivated violence can be excused, and erode the rule of law by removing consequences for serious offenses.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
County
Response rates from 5.9k America voters.
24% Yes |
76% No |
24% Yes |
76% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 5.9k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 5.9k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2JNN9V4mos4MO
Non-violent protesters should be pardoned, but violent protestors should not. Hold Antifa, BLM, and other riots groups to the same standard.
@B2KSJBF3mos3MO
No, and, by law, the charges or convictions of treason or insurrection should be ineligible for pardons
@Dry550 3mos3MO
No, that’s setting a dangerous precedent that criminals can be excused so long as you point your violence at politics, it undermines rule of law and it does undermine accountability
@Jax 2mos2MO
They should re-evaluated. If what they did during the riot wasn't violent, then yes. I also think every prisoner should be re-evaluated if they didn't commit a violent crime.
@B3H228V2mos2MO
An act of insurrection is a form of treason, and shouldn't be permitted due to their political bias.
@B2KP3YC3mos3MO
Only the ones who didn't cause harm to law enforcement/other officials, and the ones who didn't cause over 1000$ in property damage.
@B2KM9YM3mos3MO
This is a tough one. one could argue entrapment, but is hard to prove. i don't think full pardons are the correct move but reduced sentencing. yes they did wrong so they need to be reprimanded. but not made an example from. the US citizens need to know they still have a voice and a say so in matters but not be scared to speak up. Proper channels need to be setup to promote opinions outside of the voting system and congress.
@B2KLDV33mos3MO
it depends on the lengths that they went on that day I believe some who destroyed things should not be pardoned while I belive that not everyone there should be in trouble.
Join in on the most popular conversations.