Proponents argue that hiring based strictly on merit ensures that the most qualified individuals are chosen for positions, promoting efficiency and productivity. They believe that focusing on merit alone avoids potential bias from affirmative action or diversity quotas. Opponents argue that eliminating DEI initiatives may lead to a lack of representation and reinforce systemic inequalities. They believe that diversity in the workforce leads to better decision-making, innovation, and a more inclusive society.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
State
Response rates from 2.6k America voters.
47% Yes |
53% No |
47% Yes |
53% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.6k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.6k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2MH57K3mos3MO
No, DEI hiring initiatives ensure the most qualified candidate gets the job and that there is no hidden discrimination
@B2LTGDT3mos3MO
Yeah that sounds like it might be a good idea but I just think it would end up with white people just hiring white people
@B392N4T3mos3MO
Yes, but only if hiring initiatives are truly in favor of strictly merit-based hiring
@B3DVFJ9 2mos2MO
No, Proper DEI does not mean unqualified, you still have to have merit. The initiatives favor hiring those who are qualified instead of someone whose just nice or a friend already.
@B2N33363mos3MO
Yes, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination
@9VP9F35 1mo1MO
No because if done correctly in accordance with the EEOC and Civil Rights Act, “DEI hiring” is merit based hiring
@B3H6FHL2mos2MO
They should just hire those who are most qualified.
@B58XHHF5 days5D
Although I believe they should I also believe that they should increase acknowledgement on Hostile Hiring Practices.
Join in on the most popular conversations.