Should the government regulate airline frequent flier programs?

There shouldn't be a rewards program, period. It insinuates that they care more about people who fly regularly than ones that don't. It inherently shows their bias, that being their greed for money.

Yes, they should overhaul the airline sector as a whole. Airlines should not be able to nickel and dime customers to death for every little thing, nor should they be able to oversell flights

Not regulate, per se. But, there should be rules set in place, so practices are fair to those who've earned points.

Investigations can be done if there is suspicion of any foul play, but if there is evidence of none, then why not go through with the programs.

The government should consider regulating airline frequent flyer programs to ensure consumer protection and prevent unfair or deceptive practices, as these programs have become a significant part of the economy and consumers rely on them for travel benefits.
Here's a more detailed look at the arguments for and against regulation:
Arguments for Regulation:
Consumer Protection:
Frequent flyer programs are now a vital part of the travel experience, and consumers view their points as part of their savings, so airlines should be held accountable for fair and transparent practices.
Preve…  Read morenting Unfair Practices:
Airlines have been accused of devaluing points, making it harder to earn rewards, and imposing vague conditions for redemption, which can be seen as unfair to consumers.
Transparency:
Airlines should be required to disclose the true value of points and miles, as well as any changes to program terms, to ensure consumers are aware of the potential impact on their rewards.
Increased Oversight:
The Department of Transportation (DOT) has the authority to investigate unfair practices, but some argue that the agency has been slow to act, and more proactive oversight is needed.
Protecting Consumer Value:
Some argue that airlines are essentially acting as financial institutions with their frequent flyer programs, and therefore, they should be subject to greater oversight to protect consumer value.
Arguments Against Regulation:
Free Market Principles:
Some argue that the market should be allowed to self-regulate, and that government intervention can stifle innovation and competition.
Airlines' Discretion:
Airlines argue that they have the right to manage their loyalty programs as they see fit, and that regulation could be overly burdensome.
Potential for Overreach:
Some worry that government regulation could lead to overreach and stifle airlines' ability to offer innovative and competitive rewards programs.
Enforcement Challenges:
Some question whether the DOT has the resources and expertise t

To a certain extent to ensure legality, rules, and so forth. Making sure that the government regulation isn't unfair, but to ensure protection of the customer, company, and law.

Yes and programs that can be altered by the company at any time to the determent of the consumer should be restricted.