Answer Overview

Response rates from 26.9k America voters.

29%
Yes
71%
No
29%
Yes
71%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 26.9k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 26.9k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @n35w101  from Oklahoma  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, real estate is already taxed annually based on their current valuation, even when not sold. I see no reason why other assets shouldn't be treated similarly.

 @9TRLW9J from Florida  answered…10mos10MO

The value of an asset is based on what someone is willing to pay for it. If the item has not sold then there is only speculation on the value. It’s not fair to tax anyone on someone else’s speculation of value.

 @9TSHCBZ from North Carolina  answered…10mos10MO

Only if two criteria are met: 1. it would only apply to individuals with net unrealized gains in a given year of $100 million + 2. they would be able to take unrealized losses against the unrealized gains.

 @B5N9D7M from New York  answered…1mo1MO

Instead increase taxes on real income of large corporations, and impeach Trump for gutting social welfare to cut taxes for the billionaires

 @9TSRQSW from Arizona  answered…10mos10MO

25% is way to much to tax anybody, just because they are making more money than others doesn't mean that they should get a quarter of their annual income taken from them

 @9TSHJQ2 from West Virginia  answered…10mos10MO

No, unrealized gains can drop due to the nature of them not being sold. Only realized gains should be taxed because they are locked in. Unrealized gains can become a loss quickly.

 @9TTFYGH from Texas  answered…10mos10MO

I can swallow my pride and acknowledge that I'm not educated enough to give a nuanced answer on this topic. If you're asking "should we tax Bezos' 38 trillion Amazon shares he hasn't sold yet" then sure, why not

 @9TZ3ZX6  from New Jersey  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only for households above a certain amount (ie households with more than $100 million in wealth)