Answer Overview

Response rates from 15.7k America voters.

10%
Yes
90%
No
10%
Yes
90%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 15.7k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 15.7k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B5XPM8F from New York  answered…1wk1W

Yes, but only if the enforcement thresholds are high, and warrants are required for using the data beyond traffic enforcement

 @B4WYC6R  from Colorado  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but it should be only after a person has been convicted of things like DUI, DWAI, or reckless driving resulting in injury and will be a fee imparted to the vehicle owner/operator

 @B4C6FCD from Missouri  answered…3mos3MO

No, that can easily lead to danger and/or control. The only application I can see for this is if the person has caused an incident beforehand.

 @B4D6KHP from Georgia  answered…3mos3MO

No, for the sake of privacy, the 14th amendment, the constitution, freedom, federalism, weak government, and checks and balances.

 @9V8GHCH from Idaho  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, only to people with a history of reckless driving, drunk driving, or any kind of driving that puts others at risk.

 @B4MLZLP from Colorado  answered…3mos3MO

No, but every vehicle should include gps to track and track statistics locally by the owner/operator.

 @B4LL4ZT from Michigan  answered…3mos3MO

No unless there is a valid reason for a person to need vehicle tracking, such as repeated offenses of unsafe driving behavior.

 @B4LF4V7 from Illinois  answered…3mos3MO

No, we should leave government forces to control driving behavior manually in order to do their job.