Mandatory GPS tracking involves using GPS technology in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety. Proponents argue that it enhances road safety and reduces accidents by monitoring and correcting dangerous driving behaviors. Opponents argue that it infringes on personal privacy and could lead to government overreach and misuse of data.
Response rates from 15.7k America voters.
10% Yes |
90% No |
10% Yes |
90% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 15.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 15.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B5XPM8F1wk1W
Yes, but only if the enforcement thresholds are high, and warrants are required for using the data beyond traffic enforcement
@B4WYC6R 2mos2MO
Yes, but it should be only after a person has been convicted of things like DUI, DWAI, or reckless driving resulting in injury and will be a fee imparted to the vehicle owner/operator
@B4C6FCD3mos3MO
No, that can easily lead to danger and/or control. The only application I can see for this is if the person has caused an incident beforehand.
@B4D6KHP3mos3MO
No, for the sake of privacy, the 14th amendment, the constitution, freedom, federalism, weak government, and checks and balances.
@9V8GHCH9mos9MO
Yes, only to people with a history of reckless driving, drunk driving, or any kind of driving that puts others at risk.
@B4MLZLP3mos3MO
No, but every vehicle should include gps to track and track statistics locally by the owner/operator.
@B4LL4ZT3mos3MO
No unless there is a valid reason for a person to need vehicle tracking, such as repeated offenses of unsafe driving behavior.
@B4LF4V73mos3MO
No, we should leave government forces to control driving behavior manually in order to do their job.
Join in on the most popular conversations.