Distracted driving penalties aim to deter dangerous behaviors, such as texting while driving, to improve road safety. Proponents argue that it deters dangerous behavior, improves road safety, and reduces accidents caused by distractions. Opponents argue that penalties alone may not be effective and enforcement can be challenging.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State Senate District
Response rates from 16k America voters.
69% Yes |
31% No |
69% Yes |
31% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 16k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 16k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9N5WBYD12mos12MO
Yes, but part of the issue is that mass adoption touchscreens in cars requires greater attention than analog consoles and should be addressed first.
@9P9DXRG11mos11MO
Yes, but 'penalties' is too vague considering they vary from state to state.
@9P82WP211mos11MO
Public awareness campaigns are more effective than the negligible deterrent effect of increased punishments for civil offenses and misdemeanors in nearly every case.
@9SXRDP28mos8MO
Yes, but only by increased penalties for injuries and property damage in crashes caused by distracted driving, not by new laws.
@9TW63B68mos8MO
Depends on how many offenses the individual has. I believe that they deserve a second chance, but after that, yes, increase the penalties.
@9TTJ3648mos8MO
To address the issue of distracted driving the government should invest in public transit - less drivers = less car fatales
@9MPYFLR12mos12MO
No, but it should provide tax breaks for buyers of cars with technology that allows drivers to interface with their smartphones via the entertainment system instead of holding their phones in their hands
@B54N44Q1wk1W
Yes, but non-monetary penalties such as license suspensions and requiring offenders to repeat a driving exam.
Join in on the most popular conversations.