Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Zipcode
Response rates from 18.6k America voters.
66% Yes |
34% No |
66% Yes |
34% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 18.6k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 18.6k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9R8GDMH10mos10MO
Public transit should be invested into for cities and high population areas but should not affect rural areas and how they choose to deal with transportation
@9ZTG2WR5mos5MO
Yes, but provide more incentives for public transportation use by increased funding and accessibility
@9Y9F8256mos6MO
It can easily become dangerous, encourage it with family and friends, but not through laws or money.
@B2JRYDP4mos4MO
I feel as if the government should churn some money into better public transportation, less supermassive 4 lane roads and more buses or even trains.
@9ZP6MLS6mos6MO
Yes, but the government should focus on public transportation services to reduce emissions and traffic
@9YD78G66mos6MO
Yes, but something needs to change in order for that to be effective since currently, it is either too difficult or too expensive.
@9YC3LRP6mos6MO
rather than providing incentives, they should make it easy enough to use and practical enough that people WANT to use it.
@8DHCWV4 6mos6MO
No, but States should receive Federal incentives for incentivizing carpooling and shared transportation services.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
