+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 15.3k America voters.

47%
Yes
53%
No
47%
Yes
53%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 15.3k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 15.3k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @oneroshi  from Connecticut  answered…11mos11MO

 @9RD7VNS from Wisconsin  answered…10mos10MO

No, the government shouldn't be subsidizing exploitative corporations using subcontractors as employees to avoid labor regulations at all, and should instead regulate them the same way as taxi services. Low-income individuals should be provided with subsidies to use public transportation and public transportation infrastructure should be expanded to make this feasible.

 @9NP7RH6 from Montana  answered…11mos11MO

 @B4PVGDL from Texas  answered…3wks3W

No, but incentives should be given towards ride-sharing companies to pick up low income individuals at a lower cost.

 @B4L2ZJP from South Carolina  answered…4wks4W

Yes, but only if they are green energy alterantives like subways, electirc cars etc, and also cots the same amount as a taxi but slightly cheaper

 @B4HWQD2 from Oregon  answered…1mo1MO

Not if it lowers the pay for these drivers which it in reality does in practice as I've seen myself.

 @B4FNL7M from Illinois  answered…1mo1MO

could be a short-term solution for accessibility, but the focus should be on strengthening public transportation as a more sustainable and equitable option

 @B4D9X9M from Illinois  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, only if the people who have access to such a program cannot use a personal vehicle due to physical/mental disability and/or they do not have up-to-standard public transportation to their destination(s).