+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 28.6k America voters.

35%
Yes
65%
No
35%
Yes
65%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 28.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 28.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9QXC4Y7 from Minnesota  answered…10mos10MO

No, cities should be putting more effort into community designs that encourage non motorized traffic.

 @9RDHKH3 from Minnesota  answered…10mos10MO

I don’t believe this concept has been explored to a degree where it is possible to determine whether the pollution reduction outweighs the effects of pricing on lower-income drivers, or vice versa.

 @9RBTJRM from Illinois  answered…10mos10MO

No, generally these congested cities are filled with persons who live paycheck to paycheck which would make it much more difficult for those people to make it to work.

 @9QT5RZP from New York  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but ensure that cities have proper public transportation in place for the surrounding suburban areas first.

 @9MM7KVZ from Minnesota  answered…12mos12MO

 @9QSH8FV from New Jersey  answered…10mos10MO

No, offer incentives for cites to implement alternative transportation options to reduce congestion instead.

 @9PSNK4X  from California  answered…11mos11MO

Congestion pricing serves no purpose other than to raise funds for city and state governments, and only highly populated states like California, Texas, New York and Florida (there are more) would be affected by these regulations. The already clear population migration issues of those states would only grow more severe with regulations like these.

 @9NH4KTR from Massachusetts  answered…11mos11MO

invest more in high speed rail to limit the number of cars on the road and implement parking control