Carbon capture technologies are methods designed to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions from sources like power plants to prevent them from entering the atmosphere. Proponents argue that subsidies would accelerate the development of essential technologies to combat climate change. Opponents argue that it is too costly and that the market should drive innovation without government intervention.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 17k America voters.
67% Yes |
33% No |
62% Yes |
28% No |
5% Yes, and also increase spending for renewable energy and reforestation |
2% No, provide subsidies to renewable energy companies instead |
2% No, the government should invest in planting more trees to capture carbon instead |
|
1% No, tax carbon emissions instead |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 17k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 17k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NF9B4M11mos11MO
No, but companies should be taxed for their carbon emissions and this will incentivize them to invest in carbon capture technologies and other ways of reducing pollution
@SenBR2003 12mos12MO
Yes, but only in tandem with supporting renewable energy production.
@GavinKuebler12mos12MO
No, they are a largely inefficient means of reducing carbon since they focus only on reversing environmental harm rather than reducing it and can be used to justify further carbon emissions.
@B55P3CW1wk1W
No, Carbon capture is not an effective method of combating climate change. We should focus our efforts elsewhere.
@B52GDRS2wks2W
Climate change is an absurd scam that challenges human intelligence. The only thing we need to do is minimize environmental damage and plant more trees.
@B4TYFKS3wks3W
They should, but they should also, make it so they have to show results or where the money is going to. So, it does not get spent improperly.
@B4KLCSB4wks4W
No because carbon capture will incentivize fossil fuel companies to increase drilling and will not have a big impact on mitigating greenhouse gas emissions
@B4FNL7M1mo1MO
supportive in principle as a potential tool, but with careful oversight to ensure it doesn't become an excuse to continue fossil fuel reliance; prioritize emissions reduction
Join in on the most popular conversations.