Answer Overview

Response rates from 17.3k America voters.

43%
Yes
57%
No
43%
Yes
57%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 17.3k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 17.3k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9M3KVCG from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Only some weapons... ... and I think that they should be able to be guided by artificial AND human intelligence - human intelligence first.

 @9LFRY89 from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only when the artificial intelligence is completely ready and foolproof, and it shouldn't be used for all weapons.

 @B2W4NHW from Georgia  answered…5mos5MO

I would need more information regarding the efficacy of the AI capabilities regarding military weapons

 @B5XCPM9  from Florida  answered…4 days4D

No, AI should never be used for possible life altering and changing and threatening situations as it is not always accurate and reliable.

 @B5X23FC from Maryland  answered…1wk1W

The military should be allowed to have the choice to use AI-guided weapons, but with a concrete system of checks and balances, and only at the discretion of top artificial intelligence researchers

 @B5WN5NZ from Georgia  answered…1wk1W

Yes and no. Human-in-the-Loop Systems: Many experts support AI-assisted weapons with human oversight—where a human must approve lethal decisions.
• International Laws: Groups like the UN and Human Rights Watch advocate for treaties banning or regulating fully autonomous lethal weapons.
• Transparency and Ethics Boards: Militaries can form oversight bodies to ensure ethical use and clear rules of engagement for AI systems.

 @B5WDD24 from North Carolina  answered…2wks2W

Yes, as long as there are clear ethical regulations ensuring accountability and avoiding collateral damage

 @B5VXCLH from Texas  answered…2wks2W

Yes if the AI system can identify and track targets, but a human must authorize any use of force (Human-in-the-loop) or The AI system can select and engage targets autonomously, but a human supervises and can intervene or override decisions (Human-on-the-loop). However no if the AI system operates entirely autonomously, with no human intervention at the point of lethal action (Human-out-of-the-loop).