Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

69 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

Yes

 @B5BDLDF from Wisconsin  disagreed…2mos2MO

No economist ever in the history of anything has ever said that imposing heavy tariffs on any country would benefit their own

 @B4VTDKK from Pennsylvania  disagreed…2mos2MO

That if we put Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals then money will go up since everyone will need to but the tarrifed Pharmaceuticals at some point.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

Yes, and extend exemptions to all critical supply chain items

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

No

 @B4TSGRL from Illinois  disagreed…2mos2MO

that impacts people's access to life-saving medical care, increasing the price of the out-of-pocket cost on medicine and may have an effect on what helth insurance covers

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

Yes, but review exemptions annually to encourage domestic production

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

No, exemptions weaken the goal of reshoring manufacturing

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

No, all imports should face tariffs to ensure fair competition

 @B4SBJL7 from Idaho  answered…2mos2MO

There should not be a tariff war going on in the first place, but if there are tariff's essentials should be exempt.

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  agreed…2mos2MO

Tariff wars only lead to higher prices for the consumer. In the case of China, the side that gets hurt by trade wars the most are the importers, which is the US.

  @wiselaura from Indiana  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, and extend exemptions to all critical supply chain items but review exemptions annually to encourage domestic production.

 @8BP8QFFGreen  from Virginia  answered…2mos2MO

This question assumes that we should have tariffs at all. This is an unnecessary tax on the American Consumer when prices are already at record highs.

 @B5YHTLGIndependent from Illinois  answered…20hrs20H

As the POTUS said himself, all the companies have to do is move into the United States to avoid the high tariffs. But recently the President has back tracked his actions and die down on the high tariffs.

 @B5YDBFP  from Georgia  answered…1 day1D

No, but let consumers in very low income brackets pay less money for the essential goods (if there is an increase in consumer prices on the essential goods).

 @ProudJew  from Tennessee  answered…4 days4D

"Security Bridge Strategic Exemptions"
"Yes, but with a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes American lives while building domestic capacity. Essential pharmaceuticals and critical medical supplies get temporary exemptions with mandatory domestic production requirements - companies must invest tariff savings into U.S. manufacturing within 3 years or face retroactive penalties. Use exemption revenue to fund domestic pharmaceutical research and production facilities. For other critical supply chain items, create a tiered system: immediate exemptions for items where shortages could cause deaths or national security risks, with decreasing exemptions as domestic alternatives become viable. The goal isn't permanent dependency - it's ensuring Americans don't die while we rebuild our manufacturing base."

 @B5X56XM from Arizona  answered…1wk1W

Maybe. I do not feel that I know enough about the topic to fully form an opinion. However, I feel that essential resources should be supported. Though, I could see it getting taken advantage of. I also just do not feel much or any support for the pharmaceutical industry.

 @B5PK4B7 from Texas  answered…4wks4W

Yes, but outline what should be considered essential so that companies don't label their products as "essential" to avoid paying tariffs.

 @B5NLMFH from California  answered…1mo1MO

it depends on what happens when the government loses tax revenue because that could negatively impact everyone so their has to be a system or a plan there.

 @B5N7Q3L from Wisconsin  answered…1mo1MO

yes I believe that necessities shouldn't be held behind a pay wall and everyone should be able to access the things they need

 @B5M5YPH from Florida  answered…1mo1MO

Pharmaceuticals should be subject to tariffs to bring manufacturing to the US. Foreign dependence on medical goods is very bad in times of political and war tension. Other essential goods sure can be tariffed

 @B5FJSY4 from Utah  answered…2mos2MO

Essentials especially like pharmaceuticals need major regulation when coming from other places so a tariff is not a bad idea

 @B5D5WXN from California  answered…2mos2MO

It depends on what it is and it’s realisticness, overall, the answer is no but eventually these items should be manufactured in the US to achieve self sustainability and national security.

 @B5CKCJZ from Missouri  answered…2mos2MO

Pharmaceuticals should have appropriate tariffs set depending on the nature of the specific product and country of origin. Some tariffs may make sense while others don’t.

 @B5CCCN4Republican from Illinois  answered…2mos2MO

Any drugs that we can make in the U.S. that we get from other countries should have a tariff, but if we can't make them in the U.S, they should have a tariff on them.

 @B5BDGYM from North Dakota  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, although this is unfair to buisness competition in other industries pharmaceuticals save lives and making them more expensive limits the health of Americans

 @B5B3B8Q from Indiana  answered…2mos2MO

Yes but the government needs to develop a strategy that will provide incentive to people with knowledge in the field to start-up small businesses to compete and challenge large corporations, improve quality of goods, services, so they can provide livable wages while protecting citizens and the environment.

 @B59TV5Z from New York  answered…2mos2MO

No, if we are going to set a policy this damaging, let it be so damaging that the administration has to answer for it.

 @B596NB2 from Illinois  answered…2mos2MO

he should honestly drop them all, he's just bulding tensions with Canada and Mexico mainly but theres other countries that he's screwing over.

 @B58JJKS from Kansas  answered…2mos2MO

No and make sure pharmaceuticals are available to everyone and make sure a pharmaceutical amendment is passed on the Equal Trade Deficit Deal

 @B58JCCR from Texas  answered…2mos2MO

Yes they should, the pharmaceutical company is a shame. The cost of prescription medication is unbelievable even with the so called insurance.

 @B576N8S from New York  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, and reevaluate all tariffs that have been applied to make sure they are fair and logical for everyone.

 @B56WCLQ from Illinois  answered…2mos2MO

there shouldn't be any mass tariffs being implemented, and shouldnt be any that are directed to essential goods

 @B569DM8Peace and Freedom from Pennsylvania  answered…2mos2MO

No, People don't have to pay extra for medicine that either benefits them or saves their life as long as they're not using them to get high

 @B53ZBJ5 from Georgia  answered…2mos2MO

These Trump tariffs are simply another form of his shakedown/criminal enterprise/protection racket. Get rid of him and tariffs

 @B53T8Z2 from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

All medication and basic resources, such as oil, coal and rare minerals should be tariff exempt. Only tariff finished products.

 @B4ZBNQS from Oklahoma  answered…2mos2MO

No, there shouldn't be any tariffs to begin with, but since it's happening, then yes, they should be exempt.

 @B4Z6D6Q from South Carolina  answered…2mos2MO

The reason why things are so cheap is because it's made off shore, we need to worry about our own economy to reduce prices here before we're allowed to manufacture in-house.

 @B4Z3GFG from Kansas  answered…2mos2MO

I think we shouldn't be doing these tariffs at all and try and find a solution instead of both China and the US acting like stubborn little kids. If we all worked together we could progress all of our countries exponentially and this could also lead us to solve other world problems and improve the state our country is in internally as well. That will never happen though because of the pride of ALL of our government officials.

 @B4YVSY9 from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

I think all pharmaceuticals are pretty much poison. I am holistic and believe in natural medicines (excluding marijuana in some cases).

 @B4Y49ZC from Nebraska  answered…2mos2MO

they shouldn't even have tariffs at all, its like trading something with someone, but also asking for a dollar.

 @B5VJLR9 from Florida  answered…2wks2W

Tariff's are a scam in my opinion, the whole ideology should be abolished, because more printed pieces of paper does nothing for society.

 @B5V4T9X from Missouri  answered…2wks2W

Yes, ideally tariffs should not be a thing, but medicine is especially important to ensure fair competition with domestic producers.

 @B5TYTN6Peace and Freedom from Maine  answered…2wks2W

we should not buy pharmaceuticals from other countries, we need to manufacture them in the USA for safety control, supply guarantees, and it would create jobs in the USA.

 @B5T327Z from Florida  answered…3wks3W

Companies should be mandated to operate in America and limited to sell medicines at a certain price threshold

 @B5SWW9Z from Illinois  answered…3wks3W

Tariffs should only be focused on China, North Korea, Iran, Russia, Israel. Ukraine, and Israel and any country that is a threat or in a war.

 @B5SFWS8 from Vermont  answered…3wks3W

Too many of our pharmaceuticals come from China. Pharmaceuticals must be manufactured in the US in order to safeguard our nations health.

 @B5S6JGV from California  answered…3wks3W

Yes but then you would have to review what kind of goods they are, for example, if they are medicine related then yes they should be excempted.

 @B5RMGB9  from Indiana  answered…3wks3W

Tariffs are not effective. The people doing trades with other counties are American citizens when they shop at Walmart.

 @B5RDB5J from Indiana  answered…4wks4W

If they are from prosperous countries I trade freely, but for socialist and communist countries, no.

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…1mo1MO

All imports should be tariff free. I support building domestic industries with similar legislation compared to the Chips and Science Act

 @B5HQPWV from Massachusetts  answered…2mos2MO

All tariffs should be more deliberately reviewed, planned, and targeted so as not to injure American citizens or lose allies.

 @B5GJY99 from California  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, these products should be exempt from tariffs, but all of these tariff increases are unwarranted and should not be in place.

 @B5GBR96 from New York  answered…2mos2MO

Honestly, I can't tell the future, but what I do know is at the current state of our country,, anything putting our people ar risk for there well being should be abolished

 @B5G4PHG from Massachusetts  answered…2mos2MO

No, we shouldn’t rely on pharmaceutical drugs because all the companies care about is profit at the expense of our physical and mental health.

 @B55BS6D from Utah  answered…2mos2MO

Pharmaceutical companies should be required to make medicines for the people in the us at a fair price

 @B52BBRC from Massachusetts  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, only if the exempt goods cannot be produced at a scale in the country, large enough to sustain the country's needs

 @B4ZDJFB from Tennessee  answered…2mos2MO

Tariffs are just a bad idea in general why would we want to implement that on some other country just because we have a vendetta against them

 @8Z5SKCG  from Alabama  answered…1mo1MO

No tariffs except on countries with unfair practices and hostile policies toward our country. Combine this also with a incentive for companies to move out of China and relocate certain manufacturing, like pharmaceuticals.

 @B5J962N from New York  answered…1mo1MO

Yes because these medications are helping people and shouldn't be expensive for the average American. If helps people who have chronic illness, mental illness, etc.

 @B5LGGPC from Arizona  answered…1mo1MO

The government should stop putting the burden of paying big pharma on U.S. citizens and spread the wealth to other countries.

 @B5L8F2P from Iowa  answered…1mo1MO

They shouldn't have put on the tariffs in the first place, and should've expanded the price caps on pharmaceuticals

 @B5L3BRS  from Oklahoma  answered…1mo1MO

Essential goods like pharmaceuticals, food, and medical supplies should be exempt from tariff increases. These are necessities for the sick and poor. Raising their prices is unjust and punishes the most vulnerable. We should protect domestic jobs, but not at the cost of human health and dignity

 @B5LT37G from Oklahoma  answered…1mo1MO

No as it hard to determine what is essential, this could vary by extremes as to what that could mean.

 @B4TKWHM from Virginia  answered…2mos2MO

Neither Yes nor No is a valid response; there should not be tariffs in the first place, they are forcing a tax on the US consumer.

 @B4S959W from Missouri  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, if the medication is available in the U.S., and if it is a life-saving medication such as Insulin, I believe the cost should be regulated because it is a necessity for life in type 1 diabetics. Any drug of this nature should follow suit.

 @B5TJPMGfrom Guam  answered…2wks2W

Yes – “Is there no balm in Gilead?” (Jeremiah 8:22). Essential care should not be treated as a political tool.

 @B4TDCH5 from North Carolina  answered…2mos2MO

No and again, tariffs should be imposed gradually over a large period of time meaning 5 to 30 years depending on how large the tariff is intended to be at the end of the time period. Drastic tariffs will deleteriously affect the economy

 @B4TZGPH from Texas  answered…2mos2MO

No, but review exemptions annually to encourage domestic production as well as review to see if circumstances have changed.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...