Should asylum seekers be required to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed?

No

This presumed a racial profile claiming that asylum seekers are only regard to Mexico rather than the whole support status. I think in general they should wait status for approval in the current country they are in depending on the circumstances like a dictorial government like a corruption of power like Haiti, North Korea and others alike. If requiring the fleeing from one home country to find another of peace and livilyhood. It should be understood that proper measures are put in place but also audited to all accounts like a Government agency meaning to be audited as well.

It depends on the case, but most of the time people who are fleeing from Mexico should be given a safe place to reside.

In the end a hard yes or no is hard for me to say. People only escape like that if they are scared, but I think that they should also understand that going over illegally is against the law and should be prepared to be deterred.

they should be required to stay wherever they are from while their case is being processed not to tarnish a relationship with Mexico.

No, but they should be required to remain within the borders of the sanctuary city, they are in while they await approval or disapproval for citizenship.

They should have a waiting area or residency that they can stay at in the interim because most people seeking asylum are running from violence or corrupt government and who’s to say that they won’t get killed in the time that the U.S processes their documents.

No, but streamline to process so asylum seekers aren't waiting 5 or more years for their citizenship

I agree that there should be more organization to the method of immigration, however by denying them entrance to the country, they can be put at more risk to their situations and be met with more strife while detained.

I say they remain within the protection of Mexican or US authorities in a place like the border checkpoints until they get access to asylum with background checks though. People do have the will to lie in some stances.

Only if adequate shelter, safety, and legal access are guaranteed, otherwise, it’s just pushing people into danger. Let’s fix our processing system, not outsource responsibility to unstable conditions

They should be put in a few asylum buildings around the U.S. to avoid the spread of potential terrorists.

If they are from Mexico, they should be allowed in on a restricted basis. If they are from somewhere else, they should only be allowed to seek asylum in the first country they come to.

They should not go to Mexico. They should be out of the United States due to safety concerns, but we shouldn’t bestow these people to Mexico, corrupting their safety.

be allowed to stay at the border at a facility where there can be law enforcement supervision, until the case is processed.

Yes, but this process should only take a few weeks and be accessible online culminating with an in-person interview

If they are from Mexico, yes. If they are not, they should wait in the countries they are originally from for the sake of border security.

Asylum seekers should be given a choice to remain in Mexico or stay at a designated residency for asylum seekers.

Sometimes when people are coming into the U.S they are trying to get here so they can live a better life. If their situation is dangerous in Mexico I think that they should be able to stay in America under surveillance.

This question doesnt specify where every asylum speaker is from so im just imagining the us shipping a buncha asylum seekers in europe, asia, or africa to mexico and it makes me laugh

If they are from Mexico, then yes. If they are not from Mexico, then no, they should go back to their original countries.

No, but they should be required to remain at the local migrant, shelter or embassy until their cases are approved or disapproved.

This question presumes a racial profile. But, in general, asylum seekers should stay in their country with exceptions for dictatorial or corrupt governments

At first I think the answer is yes. But this is very complex. I think we should provide people with an Internet option to ask for asylum so they don't make dangerous trips in the first place. They could ask for asylum while being in any other country but theirs. This should be a United Nations offering. America does not need to solve all the problems in the world by itself. That would help collecting evidence for war crimes, measuring how countries are treating people and making this a universal problem. All countries should take some people to help. Not only america.

No, but they should not be allowed to leave the sanctuary city they are in until they have obtained citizenship.

I believe that they should be in the United States in a safe place waiting for process and then if they pass then they get to keep on going but they don't pass then they go back to their country

The "Remain in Mexico" policy, which forced asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases were processed in the US, has raised significant concerns about human rights and the safety of asylum seekers, and has been criticized as both illegal and ineffective.
Here's a breakdown of the key issues:
What is the "Remain in Mexico" policy?
The policy, also known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), required certain asylum seekers, who were not Mexican nationals, to return to Mexico and wait there while their U.S. immigration court cases were processed.
The…  Read more policy was implemented by the Trump administration and later reinstated after the Biden administration attempted to end it.
The policy was suspended by the Biden administration in 2022, but the Supreme Court ruled that the Biden administration had the authority to end the policy, according to the Texas Tribune.
Concerns and Criticisms:
Human Rights:
Human Rights First and other organizations have raised concerns about the safety of asylum seekers in Mexico, where they face violence, extortion, and other dangers.
Ineffectiveness:
Some argue that the policy is not an effective deterrent to migration, as many migrants who were returned to Mexico under the program made subsequent attempts to cross the border.
Due Process:
Critics argue that the policy violates due process rights, as asylum seekers are forced to wait in Mexico with little or no access to legal counsel and are often unable to gather evidence and prepare for their cases.
Legal Challenges:
The policy has faced legal challenges, with some courts finding it to be inconsistent with U.S. law and international obligations.
International Law:
The policy has been criticized for potentially violating non-refoulement obligations under the Refugee Convention and its Protocol, which prohibits returning people to persecution or torture.
Impact on Families:
The policy has also been criticized for separating families, as asylum seekers who are the primary caretakers of children, siblin

Unless you are in the rest or harm or in a dangerous situation then no. If it’s a simple process and you are financially and mentally able and have the capacity to stay in your country, then should stay. But also feel like the process should not take so long because then what is the point of having either or whether you’re here or there the process is just gonna take forever.

No, they are seeking asylum in America nmand by international law we have to let them in, also not everyone seeking asylum in America gets here through Mexico

Yes, but asylum seekers who are sick, pregnant, or have children under the age of 13 should be allowed to enter the US

No, not all asylum seekers enter the US through the southern border. We need to increase the size of the immigration department to expedite the cases of asylum seekers to a reasonable number of days.

No, but it should be evaluated case by case and by any emergencies in America happening at that time.

Not in Mexico, but also not in the US. There should be an area near the border in the US where they can stay while waiting for their cases to be processed.

no, but the united states government should implement a system to insure they have somewhere to stay (within reach of the government and law enforcement) while they are being investigated.

No, we need reservations to house them in or near the U.S border until further notice, some immigrants are in immediate danger and should not be forced to remain so.

If someone were to be required to stay in their native country while they are being processed, they should be ensured adequate financial and medical safety while being processed.

Yes, but if they are faced with desperate situations or possible endangerment, they should be able to seek refuge in the States while their cases are processed.

Nope. Help them book as many days in a hotel close to the airport or border center they’re using to enter the country, and specifically book their hotel rooms for the exact same number of days (business days and weekend days combined) that it could take for their documents to be processed.

I feel like there are certain circumstances that lead to asylum seekers to flee to America. If asylum seekers have evidence to support that they need to stay in America, they should be able to stay in America.

No, asylum seekers should be held by Border Patrol in a safe, secure facility where they have access to food, water, and shelter until their case has been processed.

If they have money to live on their own they can be given work permits after securing a job and a place to live.

No but they should not be allowed to leave the embassy or consult where they are applying for citizenship.

Asylum seekers should be informed ahead of time where they can be held while their claims are being processed.

No, because sometimes their situation is so dire that they would be dead by the time their case is processed.

We should ban Asylum seekers unless citizens by vote allow asylees from a particular foreign nation.

If the seeker in question has the resources to care for themselves and loved ones within Mexico, then yes. If not, then no, many asylum seekers come to the US for such resources and they should be provided if needed.

it depends if their cases are very bad or ok. if the case is bad then no but if the case is ok enough then yes.

If they are in physical danger, then there should be a place for them in the US that is like temporary housing while case is processed, quickly.

Only if it safe where they are staying, if not transport them to a safe community right next to the border just in case something goes wrong.

No, but there should be a place within the USA where asylum seekers can stay while their cases are processing

It depends on if they have family in the U.S. If they have family in the U.S. they should be able to stay. If they are here alone they should have to go back to Mexico during their cases.

Depends on the reason why they left the country and the immigrant should be watched closely until they can get a background check and it shouldn’t be Mexico it should be the country that they live in and instead of attacking or rebelling against the government people should make suggestions to the government about this issue peacefully instead.

Not all asylum seekers are entering at Mexico. If they are political or war refugees they should be allowed to wait in the US. If they are "economic refugees" they should not be allowed to enter and/or subject to public charge rules.

No, but limit their ability to travel within the US until their request for asylum has been processed and accepted

Their should be several countries including the United States where they can be temporarily held. We shouldn’t put the burden on one country to whether its us or mexico.

No, but give them an opportunity to be in the U.S. in some kind of camp to protect them in case of issues in their previous country.

No, if someone is taking the steps to enter the country legally they shouldn’t be forced to wait in areas where they can’t get proper counsel, coaching and direction as to what to do next

No, if they are seeking asylum they should be temporarily allowed to stay here until a decision is made.

i think that there should be a way station of sorts juuust over the boarder in a temporary housing unit for families and indeviduals who are seeking asylum for violence or life threatening situ's or religious persecution. not for everyone who thinks they will be entering the 'Land of Milk and Honey'. we ABSOLUTELY NEED TO START OVER FROM SCRATCH our immigration court system. The reality is that 90% of ALL problems with illegal immigrants stem out from Ig Court!

Yes, once they enter the country it costs time and money to make sure they leave, if their asylum request is denied.

Yes, but only if their lives are in immediate danger, they can reside in select, secure locations in the United States, near the border

No, we should instead reform the process so that asylum seekers are in safe conditions, have access to adequate legal support, and so that our processes are in line with international asylum protections. We should also reform our immigration policies so that it doesn’t take forever to become a U.S. citizen and so that there is a clear and simple path to becoming a U.S. citizen.

I think the borders need to be tight, but make entry readily available and easy reopen work visas and make becoming a citizen easier. LEGAL IMAGRATION IS GOOD

It should really depend on their situation, if their asylum need is great enough they should be allowed in the US where they are better protected.

No, as current immigration law clearly allows them to reside in the United States during that time (whether that's good or not)

No, transfer them to under crowded facilities but allow them in United States so it protects them from dangers of their native country.

yes, asylum seekers should be required to stay in Mexico, unless their reason for seeking asylum is because they are in dangerous situations.

No, but they must remain in regular contact with immigration while their case is being processed. If they’re undocumented don’t, and their whereabouts are determined, they should be detained and deported, with their case automatically dismissed.

No the Federal Government should construct a safe zone at the boarder to house asylum seekers and protect them while their cases are processed. This facility should be up to top standards and have the necessary resources to allow asylum seekers to obtain temporary work visas housing and rudimentary employment should they wish to legally become a US citizen.

have asylum seekers live in a US embassy, make embassies bigger, with military personel present and give asylum seekers escorts and protection.

yes and increase the amount of immigration attorneys so that asylum seekers cases are quickly processed

No, but I think there should be an implemented pre-court screening in detention centers to only let eligible asylum seekers on the territory of the US.

Either they should stay in Mexico, or they should be sent to a border city, where they would be under supervision of DHS and similar agencies, while their asylum requests are being processed

it depends on what they are requesting asylum for, if its economic problems then yes, but if they are active danger then no, they should be allowed into the country but kept somewhere until processed

Asylum seekers who have crossed through a safe country to reach the United States should be automatically denied on the grounds that they are already able to seek asylum in that country

No, asylum seekers are not inherently all from Mexico, they should remain in a asylum center hosted by the united states as their cases await review to ensure their safety from their host nation while protecting the national security interests of the united states, but should not be equivalent to kids in cages.

No, but do not allow them to enter the country fully, and funded living site should be installed for those waiting for cases

No, but there might be circumstances where it would be OK to do so given the details of a particular case. In any rate the process should be vastly improved before this happens.

Asylum seekers should remain in their home country or current country while their cases are processed

There should be a limit to the number of occupants in U.S. detention centers, and when that limit is reached, others seeking asylum must remain in Mexico until there is space or their claim has been reviewed.

Yes, if Mexico agrees to keep them. Otherwise deport them to the country from which they entered and let they country content with what to do with them.

No, but the immigration system needs to be fixed. There needs to be an easy clear path to citizenship or denial citizenship.

as long as they are safe or relocated to a safe area that is protected and identified by both nations

No, the US should provide temporary housing while they review their claims. not only does this provide meaningful jobs but it also provides those living in dangerous places and a safe place

If someone is convited in a different country they need to be tried in there own country where your from.

There should be a place in the US where asylum seekers can safely reside if they choose to do so while they wait for their claims to be reviewed

They should be in a neutral area so they are safe while their cases are processed. Asylum seekers are running from danger and the the U.S. should always look to protect people in need.

There should be a designated area in the u.s. where they can stay until processed or a special license given to them until then. 3 strike roll and you have to go.

If their safety is at risk, they should be allowed to stay in a safe environment where they have basic needs and comforts while they are being processed.

Depending on their case, if they are being attacked by their own country for their beliefs no. But if they committed a crime and are still going through the case, then yes.

yes they should remain in Mexico if it is not a life threatening issue. If so then they should be allowed in but detained until the case is processed

yes and no, they should try to make the places more safer while they are waiting in Mexico for their cases to be processed

Yes while they are getting cared for, but as soon as he/she is good they shouldn't be required to remain in Mexico.

I think the united states should just create a better imegration system that can provide protection for those who need it

The Mexican and American Governments needs to introduce a plan to provide safety and security to asylum seekers while they are situated in Mexico while their cases are processed by the US Government

Asylum seekers shouldn't be required to stay where they want to escape from. They should be allowed to stay in the U.S. until cases are revised and pass. If their case isn't passed they should return to Mexico but if passed, they should be allowed to stay.

If it’s proven that they are not criminals then I believe it’s okay to have a facility where they can live until their cases are processed. I am understanding that there are cartels in Mexico and people want to escape and live normal lives while at the same time I also understand that criminals do get across the border and drug smuggling.

Asylum seekers should be allowed to stay in the U.S. in controlled facilities with supervision. Otherwise, asylum seekers should remain outside of the U.S.