A national identification system is a standardized ID system that provides a unique identification number or card to all citizens, which can be used to verify identity and access various services. Proponents argue that it enhances security, streamlines identification processes, and helps prevent identity fraud. Opponents argue that it raises privacy concerns, could lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Political party:
Voting for candidate:
Yes, but only if regulations protecting individual privacy rights and preventing government overreach are also included
@9Q5P6YVRepublican10mos10MO
We already have that. It’s a social security number.
@9S6LZV29mos9MO
No, we already have this in the form of social security. However, we should address strengthening its ability to prevent fraud
@9PZ2HB510mos10MO
No, because I can only see ways that the government can abuse it like how the Chinees Communist Party uses their surveillance system on it's own citizens while also to some extent with foreigners.
@9RFW5XW10mos10MO
We already have one with Social Security Number. While you don't have to have one, good luck doing anything without one. It would be better to actually make one that's functional and secure
@9KHJQKJ 11mos11MO
No, it should be available optionally, but not mandated
@9VTCYCT7mos7MO
We already have this in the form of social security. However, we should address and strengthen its ability to prevent fraud
@9QB3RK410mos10MO
Yes, but as a replacement for social security numbers
@9R6H2FTRepublican10mos10MO
No, this is literally the Mark of the Beast. What sane person would ever say yes to this? Hell no. I belong to Jesus.
@9QSD57D10mos10MO
We already have social security, unless govt. transparency about a national repository is emphasized, you probably should not trust.
This is unnecessary as there already is a national identification system for citizens in social security.
@9SV9J3J8mos8MO
I agree with both sides, but I agree more with it being too big of a chore for citizens and would be monitoring us too closely.
@9QSH5L310mos10MO
We already have systems in place that do that exact job
@9Q9M5RR10mos10MO
Yes- if these IDs can be used to vote, secure housing, government benefits, etc.
@9QR756C10mos10MO
Isn’t this what our social security numbers are supposed to be?
@9QRM6YH10mos10MO
A national I.D. Should only be made for the connivence of the people and streamline administrative processes.
@9QSHQ4M10mos10MO
No, we already have it in the form of Social Security Numbers (SSN)
Nationally recognized identification, but used in the same ways that state identification is, not like how social credits work in china.
@B58NX8HIndependent4 days4D
Neither and ask the FBI and Homeland Security to provide security and to prevent fraud for the public
@B58JJKS5 days5D
Yes and keep them on notice until they stop falling back into there old behavior and then let them be
@B54JYWP1wk1W
Yes, Social Security Numbers have functioned inappropriately as a national ID number for far too long. Many of our partners (such as Canada) have successfully implemented a national ID system.
@B54CQ5L1wk1W
Overall, I think yes. Social Security is our current ID system and it is quite stupid and I'd much rather have an ID that actually works.
@B4ZJMRX2wks2W
Only if getting the ID is free and accessible to all citizens, available at multiple locations 24 hours for a period of time when it is first implemented. And only if accepted documentation are documents the average low-income person can obtain for free.
No, though I am in favor of implementing some sort of national identification system to replace outdated ID systems like Social Security Numbers
@B4YKKJR2wks2W
yes but at the same time it seems like the wait time for buying something would be even more absurd.
@B4Y9FCS2wks2W
Not necesarily, only because I feel that this could make people feel more like an object and not a free person
@B4WYC6R 2wks2W
Yes, but with great limitation and use such as only in necessary circumstances as this is a slippery slope into a "Stasi ID cards" situation
@B4WWLDB2wks2W
I feel like this is a double standard. On the one hand, it could prevent fraud by watching us closely, and on the other, it would mean that the government would be watching us closely. I need more time to think about this.
@B4R3GW83wks3W
No, we already have this in the form of social security, but we should strengthen what we already have.
@B4QYQD43wks3W
Yes as long as they can protect our personal information from corporations and criminals if there is any distinction . Social Security already cover that?
@B4QN4GT3wks3W
We already have national identification for citizens and should be using it for all voting purposes.
@B4QMLML3wks3W
I believe this already exists in the form of Social Security, if not, you can easily streamline this into Social Security.
We don't need to implement a new one because we already have social security numbers, but we should make that system more secure.
@B4KLCSB4wks4W
I am ok with face recognition but it needs to be very transparent about its usage and heavily regulated to ensure there are no abuses of tracking down people without a search warrant
@B4FGGSB1mo1MO
Only if it is at no cost to anyone, and available to all citizens and legal residents, and can be used to register / fulfil id requirements to vote for all eligible voters.
@B4D9X9M1mo1MO
Yes, but have it so that there are measures installed to prevent individual freedoms from being violated.
@B4D6KHP1mo1MO
No, for the sake of privacy, freedom, capitalism, weak government, the 14th amendment, the constitution, checks and balances, and federalism.
@B4BPKTX 1mo1MO
Yes, but with safeguards. Allowing for cash or alternative financial system in case of government abuse
@B4BK8671mo1MO
No, we already have Social Security Numbers, though as somebody has said, this system should be strengthened.
@B4BK4TW1mo1MO
Yes, but it's use should be restricted to court approval and warrant granted by the court when sufficient evidence is provide to the court to make use of such a system. The allowing of broad use would infringe our basic rights because the government would abuse the power without checks and balances.
@B483F4RIndependent1mo1MO
Yes. We already have one in the form of our social security number. Implementing a national ID system would improve upon the current system used.
@B47PPBY1mo1MO
We already have a national identification system that has just been upgraded to real ID. Government should use safer systems like cryptocurrency which make fraud harder to commit and traceable after.
@B459V6F2mos2MO
Yes, we already have that. expanding it would just be an excuse to further monitor citizens against their will
@B4378G32mos2MO
Yes bit every one is automatically registered and given a card, and if you lose it there is a easy path way to get a new one
@B3ZYM5D2mos2MO
Yes, showing ID should be required to vote for the sake of democracy and the republic and preventing rigged elections
@B3V69DZ2mos2MO
If identification is free and easy to obtain yes. Otherwise no. All required identification should be free and simple to get.
@B3TNRZH2mos2MO
No, since the government will likely contract this out to private enterprise and this would further enable commercial surveillance
@B3TCPJ52mos2MO
Yes, it should replace SSN and just act as National ID (essentially add picture and identifiers to the person that has the SSN.)
@B3Q56652mos2MO
I'm uncertain what is meant by National Identification system (Social Security ID? or Facial Recognition and tracking?)
Deleted2mos2MO
No, because individual states already provide ID and the provisions in the Real ID Act of 2005 are sufficient.
@7WDP6PTIndependent 2mos2MO
Yes, the Real ID system we are doing is a good way for this but we should make getting an ID easy and affordable
@B3P3GXJ2mos2MO
to an extent. maybe with criminals and people in prisons for serious crimes, yes, bt for everyone else, no.
@deweikert8 2mos2MO
Yes, because it would reduce fraud and make identification easier, but it should not be used for increased surveillance or infringe on individual freedoms.
@B3HHTB52mos2MO
Have a national identification system, but make it a driver's license while making it RealID quality.
@B3H5CYG2mos2MO
yes but only for some serious things, like something that wont get you into credit card debt, as in someone that got a hold of your banking info and is spending all your money
@B3BLCC32mos2MO
Yes but only if the government has evidence of fraud or any other law broken can they use this identification to act apon or infringe on an individuals rights.
@B34MF6V3mos3MO
Possibly if it makes proving identification or something then yeah but also I want privacy from the gov so
@B33DPBJ3mos3MO
if its proven to be helpful by qualified professional and is not super complicated for the people i don't see why not, also no money should be required of the people
@B2XGB6S3mos3MO
Yes, but it should be used in full transparency with the citizens, unless it threatens national security.
@B2W355S3mos3MO
Yes, but a little less secure and strict so people don't have to take a lot of effort to to do anything.
@B2VPG8YIndependent3mos3MO
No, as previously answered with the facial recognition question it give too much control. Especially if its a digital ID system.
@B2TW5CW3mos3MO
No, but maybe add soemthing else to the social security numbers to enchase security and protect agaist scams and other crimial acitives by other people that the number doesnt belong to
Deleted3mos3MO
Yes, but the government should also ensure that low-income citizens are also able to acquire these IDs
@B2R684N3mos3MO
No, they should not have the identification of US citizens. Criminals should no longer be citizens if they are alive.
No, social security numbers are essentially what this alludes to. However, I am in favor of a national identification system for unauthorized non-citizens, whether Migrants, Refugees, asylum seekers, or even non-citizens who are in the naturalization process, including green card holders.
@B2QJZZ23mos3MO
Only within federal settings, such as banks and other organizations. It shouldn't just be in everyday life.
@B2PYMQN3mos3MO
I would say yes, but in the event the federal government is hacked, then the whole population is done for identity wise.
no, it falls in line with facial recognition. it could easily become a tool for a authoritarian dictatorship.
@B2KW47V 3mos3MO
Yes, but it should not be operated digitally. It should be analog. And it should be implemented with voting specifically in mind.
Yes, but only for the sake of its intended use, and there should be tight regulations to ensure the government does not violate our privacy or infringe on our individual freedoms.
No, but the Real ID system could help provide this and we can enhance efforts to address this in other ways
@B2GLJWRPeace and Freedom4mos4MO
Yes, but the government can't recklessly use the identification system to violate a citizen's rights.
@B2FW3VG4mos4MO
Yes, but to make it easier for people to move between states and apply for housing and benefits anywhere
@B2FDCLRIndependent4mos4MO
Maybe, however, this system would need to be completely transparent, and the security issues would need to be solved immediately if it happened as a consolidated system, one vulnerability would cause widespread issues far greater than our current system.
@B2B26PF4mos4MO
Only in regard to Government programs to prevent fraud where individuals opt in. I.e. to prevent welfare related fraud.
Yes. A standardized national identification system could create a standardized ID card, making preventing forgeries easier.
@B279XV74mos4MO
Yes, but only if it will be used for purposes such as preventing terrorism and protection against financial crimes
@B23YYX9 5mos5MO
Yes, but my only concern is the fact that it could lead to excessive use by the government and violate personal freedom.
@9ZZMG985mos5MO
I have some concerns and questions about how this would work. It seems dystopian, so no but the idea is aiming in a somewhat helpful predictions
@9ZWRCQX5mos5MO
No. What fraud is the government looking to prevent? I worry about such an identification system being abused.
@9ZWQVPX5mos5MO
No, we have multiple ways of having some form of ID (Drivers license, Library Card, etc) no need to have another form then those.
@9ZS445V6mos6MO
No. The government should not have a database of any kind that lists deeply detailed information on all citizens. Any information they need should be given only if a request is answered by the individuals involved. Freedom and privacy is PARAMOUNT to the sovereignty of citizens.
@9ZRSSZZRepublican6mos6MO
Yes, when it comes to identification and record sharing. No, when it comes to secret databases used by the alphabet soup agencis.
Deleted6mos6MO
Yes, though we should federalize drivers licenses and photo IDs and make them free and accessible to all citizens
@9ZQNPBK6mos6MO
This can be a limno between privacy and safety, at this point of time we are not well thought on this issue upon what to do, should focus on other issues more like making sure our citizens have a better quality of life. Adding this new system can let in new issues do our messed up sundae, like the information going out to the bad eye of public, causing identification info to kidnappers, and more that we still struggle to handle today.
@9ZNSLJ36mos6MO
I think in specific things yes, like if you are in a technical business or in areas that see a lot of crime. But this can quickly become a concerning overreach on our right to privacy.
@9ZM54MN6mos6MO
We already have one. SS number needs to be updated to not expose your number for theft it's been why to long to update the SS ID.
@9ZLZ5GF6mos6MO
No, instead, enhance the ability of the Social Security Administration to ensure a mechanism to prevent widespread identity fraud within the United States.
@DylanJMcCombs03Socialist 6mos6MO
Yes, but citizens should have other avenues for services if they wish to not make use of such a system.
@9ZJSLTT 6mos6MO
I know something like this exists already, it should only be used seldomly and any any abuses against the population should be treated as treason and result in the death penalty.
@9ZH27SF6mos6MO
only if there is a way not to raise privacy concerns, lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.
@9YDWSQH 6mos6MO
Yes, but it should incorporate our drivers license, state ID and social security card so one single card/system will work for all of these, rather than implement an entirely new system.
@9YFYWXW6mos6MO
There would need to be a layout of what this would look like. I’d want to see how this would work before saying yes let’s do it
@9YFJ4DN6mos6MO
We already have that and it's currently able to be hacked or falsified. I don't think another plan would be any better.
The SSN is used for personal identification anyway and it is a garbage system. The US government and the states need to WORK TOGETHER for a better solution
@9YDNWP4Independent6mos6MO
Yes, but only if the federal government is the only one that can utilize it e.g. apple cannot require your national identification to purchase and use their products fully
@9Y5QW9JIndependent6mos6MO
Yes, but copy the European system where you are required at all times to be able to produce an ID card to verify your identity.
@9YBR4LH6mos6MO
I agree with this statement, however, they should only use it for the purpose of safety and not to become controlling and create false videos. This leaves room for those in power to power trip, and we don’t need that, but we need safety/security. Give that to the american people and stay out of our business at the same time.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
