Should the government enforce mandatory GPS tracking in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety?

Yes, only to people with a history of reckless driving, drunk driving, or any kind of driving that puts others at risk.

Yes, but only if the enforcement thresholds are high, and warrants are required for using the data beyond traffic enforcement

Yes, but it should be only after a person has been convicted of things like DUI, DWAI, or reckless driving resulting in injury and will be a fee imparted to the vehicle owner/operator

No, for the sake of privacy, the 14th amendment, the constitution, freedom, federalism, weak government, and checks and balances.

No, that can easily lead to danger and/or control. The only application I can see for this is if the person has caused an incident beforehand.

No, this idea is good in theory but the government absolutely should not have access to tracking the whereabouts of all car using citizens

There should be ways to monitor road-safety more efficiently but GPS trackers in all vehicles should not be the solution.

No. The government being able to track people's movements is only going to result in a corrupt, over-monitoring government. We do not need a "Big Brother" system.

having a tracker on you 24/7 whenever you drive would make people feel like they are being watched which could lead to more defiance and deviance

No, instead they should better enforce road laws, and replace fines with jail time depending on severity of the crime committed.

It would be a good idea, but maybe not mandatory it could be optional in a specific type of vehicles.

It's complicated. On one hand, it would be useful to improve road safety and to prevent crimes. On another hand, that's an invasion of privacy. People have the right to not be tracked around wherever they go.

GPS tracking involves security risks; it should be something administered to specific people who would likely require it compared to people who don't.

Mandatory in-vehicle GPS tracking for monitoring driver behavior is a contentious idea, offering potential benefits like reduced accidents and improved safety through early detection of impaired or distracted driving, but it also raises significant concerns about driver privacy rights and the potential for government overreach. While the government encourages the development of technologies to detect driver impairment, mandating personal GPS tracking for all vehicles to monitor behavior raises legal questions regarding the Fourth Amendment and the potential for misuse of collected data. There…  Read morefore, balancing public safety with individual privacy is crucial in any discussion about mandatory GPS tracking for drivers.
Potential Benefits
Improved Road Safety:
GPS tracking could provide real-time data on driver behavior, allowing for early intervention and prevention of crashes caused by distraction, impairment, or fatigue.
Reduced Human Error:
A significant portion of traffic accidents are due to human error, and tracking systems could help mitigate these issues.
Data for Safety Initiatives:
Data from such systems could help safety professionals identify high-risk drivers and areas, leading to more targeted safety measures.
Privacy and Constitutional Concerns
Fourth Amendment Rights:
.
The U.S. Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and mandatory, continuous GPS tracking could be seen as a violation of these rights, requiring probable cause or a warrant for such monitoring.
Intrusion on Privacy:
.
Many drivers would likely view constant location tracking and behavior monitoring as a significant intrusion into their personal privacy.
Government Overreach:
.
Concerns exist that mandatory tracking could lead to increased government surveillance and potential misuse of personal data.
Existing and Emerging Technologies
Driver Monitoring Systems (DMS):
.
The 2021 Infrastructure Act mandates the U.S. Department of Transportation to develop rules for technologies that pas

No, and we should remove speed limits. The way to reduce care accidents is to have better public transit.

No, but only for reckless drivers or known violent criminals for a short time (maybe like a year or so) to ensure they have rehabilitated

No, that's would be extreme government overreach. We don't need to live in more of a surveillance state than we already do.

No!!! i would NEVER EVER buy a car that tracked my every move just so i can have bluetooth read me my texts or listen to radio. not only that the SECOND YOU DO THAT INSURANCE COMPANIES WILL RUIN IT BY GIVING A PENALTY IF YOU REFUSE OR DONT HAVE A QUALIFYING CAR. THE INSURANCE CO.S WOULD BE VIVIOUS IN RATE HIKES

No, the government may not use GPS tracking on private vehicles absent probable cause and a warrant or warrant exception.

No, but every vehicle should include gps to track and track statistics locally by the owner/operator.

No unless there is a valid reason for a person to need vehicle tracking, such as repeated offenses of unsafe driving behavior.

No, we should leave government forces to control driving behavior manually in order to do their job.

No, while this would help safety it could easily be hacked or seen and be used as a way to locate people that should not be found by that person. while this would protect the roads it could endanger people at risk of hate crimes, rape, or murder,

Yes the government should enforce mandatory GPS tracking in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety with limitations because then the government might end up misusing it's power and misuse of data which invades people's privacy.

Government should utilize red light cameras and speed cameras at the vast majority of intersections if not all and spread out along roadways in general

I feel you should not force it on to pepole because there is still maps that can be used and you should not be driving if you cant get from point A to point B

I think those that have had traffic violations, and or DUI's in the past should be monitored for public and road safety

It should not be mandatory, but if someone volunteers, that should be taken in court as evidence of responsibility in future cases regarding traffic violations. The federal government should not have access to the databases unless they get a warrant for an individual under investigation for federal crimes

No, because I feel like the government wouldn't just use it for mandatory GPS tracking but something else

While I personally believe GPS is very helpful for driving, I do not believe it should be mandatory for cars to have installed.

To me it's in the middle, a lot of people may disagree with this for privacy concerns but honestly if it'd going to stop accidents and make roads safer for everyone, then yes.

Vehicles should have GPS but not be tracked by the government unless there is a necessary cause and warrant.

I think it is a good idea, but the invasion of privacy is a bit much. Also, some people cannot afford cars with GPS built-in.

Yes but only certain people should have access to the GPS tracking and use the information only with intention of improving road safety.

No, make it a voluntary program offered by private insurance companies that then share data with the government

No, this is extremely inappropriate instead the government should increase enforcement, update laws, and increase communication

absolutely not because it would end up being used to track citizens and sketchy things i would never approve of that.

I think that It'll be helpful but not really a good thing, the reason why I say this is because it would be safe but some may feel uncomfortable with why the government has to track their car.

Yes, but only to individuals who have recently been arrested for things like a DUI or carelessly driving etc

If the driver has a substantial history of getting into crashes then this should take place, but not under any circumstances

while it is important to improve road safety, I don't feel that this is how we should go about doing it.

I believe that if the government does use this kind of GPS tracking, it should only ever track the speeds people drive, and their accident rate rather than more personal information.

Yes, but they should only be allowed to track the speed limit, not where they are going or what they are doing.

Not in all cars however if someone is caught and or in a accident they should have it in there car to watch there driving

Only for people who are new to driving or those who have a history of reckless driving, drunk driving, or any kind of driving at puts other people at risk.

I don't appreciate the invasion of privacy, but I believe in we should monitor driving behavior and improve general road safety.

No, and ban all forms of surveillance and censorship. The 4th Amendment should be more rigidly enforced

I like where this is coming from - there are real problems with intoxication, aggression, and recklessness on the road - but this has the potential to become a government surveillance tool, so I'm shooting it down

There is a very good reason for this - distracted driving, intoxication on the road, and road rage are very serious problems - but it creates a government surveillance problem, and it has a huge potential to be exploited if there aren’t precautions written down in law

No, and get rid of all forms of transportation in order to allow for maximum environmental protection, we must walk

No, the government does not need to be tracking people unless they are a person of interest, suspect, or otherwise similar in an ongoing investigation.

No, but regulations should be put in place requiring more in-vehicle monitoring systems designed to prevent dangerous driving behavior.

No, but I think that insurance companies should be allowed to make this a requirement for individuals with poor driving histories or new drivers.

Hell no, all that does it allow the government to control our movement for various corrupt or evil reasons. Too much liability, uncertainty, and lack of trust.

yes, only for new car models: alowing cars to still exist without the need of gps unless its needed to be instald.

no this would be a violation of privacy but if people choose to allow it then I don't see the issue with it

No, I think this is a violation of our rights, but maybe exterior cameras that can tell if the person is driving safely or not.

the government shouldn't be looking at the info, but it could be useful for improving road safety and scientific research

Yes and no, not for regular people but for those who have a history of drinking and driving or have a criminal record of kidnapping or speeding.

Yes, for GPS tracking but only in case of accidents or breakdowns in which the driver doesn't know their location

Yes, only if the data gathered is ONLY used and HANDLED to improve road safety. It should be a personal choice instead of mandatory.

I think they should when you hit a certain age. In terms of getting older and when you are a young driver. From ages 23-50 you could be driving on your own.

no and yes because it can help people who are kidnapped or people who stole cars instead of wating for someone to look for it or them.

I think GPS tracking should be in the vehicles of people who have already been convicted of driving crimes, like DUIs and Hit and Runs.

i believe that this idea is a great idea but if you could have a way to exactly specify where the person is so that there aren't any misunderstandings for where you are in the world

depends on how its used, as long as a person is not monitoring the driver than its ok and instead it should just record and only check if necessary directly from the device

No, only for people with a history of distracted, reckless, drunk or any risky driving, or with a history of drug/alcohol addiction.

They should require patrol cars to have their lights on when they're sitting by the side of the road watching for unsafe driving instead.

No, only for people with a history of distracted/reckless/drunk or any risky driving, or with a history of drug/alcohol addiction.

A certain amount of monitoring is necessary but too much is overkill, there is a safe zone that I'm not entire sure about.

I know that quite a bit of people in favor of this proposal mean well, but I do not support increasing the government's surveillance capabilities.

Only people with a history of repeated traffic violations like drunk driving or reckless driving should be force to have mandatory GPS tracking in their vehicles.

Maybe with stipulations that GOD tracking can not be used in a court unless a suspect is provided with a warrant that informs them their tracking can and will be used in a court. It is illegal to track someone’s private travel by advanced technology. Illegal search and seizure. Make it an option for citizens and have an incentive to allow tracking. Say 2000 reduction in the cost of a vehicle as an example.

a standard but not required feature is how it should be done and it best set to be used as a way to locate crashes and those in danger/missing

Maybe, it would have to be extremely clear as to what data they have and it should get rid of any data when the drive was proved to be safe, only tracking the incidents.

The government should support GPS tracking in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety.

only on cars onde by people who are big fat dumb ideot drivers who disobey almost all of the laws or usesd by trucking companies or delivery trucks so that the company can check in and see were the truck is or what its doing

NO, but the parkways should be able to detect and report driver vehicles that are reckless and weave in and out at exorbitant speeds

Maybe they could try another way to improve road safety instead of tracking. Tracking, even if it's the government, it's dangerous

yes because so many people go missing and get killed and i think that would help with narrowing down suspects

The Government should add GPS tracking in all vehicles but only to monitor driving behavier and they shouldn't be allowed to use that information for anything else. They shouldn't use it to track people either.

Yes, while also having some sort of privacy regulations to prevent the government from misusing data.

yes but there should be a limitation because there's people who test drive or perform top speeds at undisclosed locations with wide open space whether its under supervision or testing their ability with safety precaution on standby.

No but the government should mandate safety installments like interlocking devices and vehicles that will not operate without a fastened seatbelt in order to drive.

No, I don't think so because they can track anyone but I also say yes because everybody today is terrible at driving

I don't think it should be enforced, but I do believe that it is beneficial to use an Apple Maps or Google Maps.

Only when tracking a specific driver that has committed significant traffic violations and as sentenced by a judge.

No, and the Government should never be allowed to track its citizens without a warrant and probable cause.

Yes, but only for people that have been convicted of severe traffic violations such as DUI, reckless driving, etc.

Yes, but it should be dormant and only accessed in case of an emergency like a kidnapping or accident.

There have been a number of numerous occasions where I have experienced people looking at their phones when they are passengers sitting next to their drivers and I don't think that GPS tracking would do much, here. People will still find a way to drive recklessly no matter what.

No, but it is fair if the government utilizes the data from GPS applications that the public opts to use and agrees to that platforms terms and conditions of usage.

No. It should incentivize insurance companies to offer drivers low rates if they do so. But not GPS tracking, just monitor driving habits.

Yes, but replace GPS tracking with a system that is more aligned with tracking car status and driving patterns, not position on a map.

No. If a vehicle is to be monitored, there needs to be some kind of warrant or documentation required. Government overreach is too much a risk.

yes but only on electronic vehicles because of all the new threats they pose such as hacking, ethanol fires, electrical failures

Only on individuals with a record of incidents, as well as young drivers (under age 25) and elderly drivers.