Should the government promote the use of bicycles by expanding bike lanes and bike-sharing programs?

No

Yes, and a real bike lane with barriers is better than a painted 'bike lane' that's almost worse than no bike lane at all.

I like the idea of expanding bike lanes and creating spaces for people to cycle because it's good exercise. But this will only work in city centers where it is cost efficient to bike to work vs the suburbs it would be a waste of money because people need to drive to get anywhere in a time efficient manner

Yes, as long as the cycling infrastructure is built reasonably to where it does not cause problems to drivers and pedestrians.

It depends because a lot of citizens all over the world will walk in the bike lanes causing the bikers having to swerve out of the lanes and potentially getting hit by a car. So in my opinion I would say yes but there are a lot of situations that needs to be taken into account for.

i believe that roads in general need to be redesigned so that going places always doesn’t require a car. other countries have a nice roadmap to where everything is accessible. i also think this would allow more youth to spend time outside as going out would be a lot easier as opposed to having an adult drive you.

Yes, but it should be done on the local level. I live in an area that has bike lanes that are rarely used. Some would say this is a waste of money. Other locations have a higher need/want for it and thus should look into implementing.

In cities like mine not everything is that close so you kind of need to drive, but in big cities, it makes sense and should.

No. Until other forms of public transit become commonplace, bicycles in urban areas are dangerous to drivers and bicyclists on roads dominated by motor vehicles. Additionally, this campaign would only impact urban areas and the sunk cost of this promotion would do nothing to help rural areas.

Yes, but mostly in urban centers, rather than in sprawling communities

We need a transportation revolution that puts people and the planet first. By investing in safe cycling infrastructure, expanding public transit, and promoting alternative transportation options, we can create healthier, more sustainable, and more equitable communities. It's time for a balanced approach that prioritizes the needs of all road users while ensuring responsible use of taxpayer dollars.

Yes, but clarify who "the government" is; is it the municipal government? County government? Federal government? Yes, but expanding bike programs should be a municipal/county issue. Some counties and cities would benefit from bike programs, others wouldn't.

No, the state should expand bike lanes for the safety of the bikers themselves, as well as better driving experiences and safety of pedestrians. Unless certain European biker cultures decide to ignore the lane and get in the street or, worse, the sidewalk, in which case they should be exempt from the protection of the law and possibly recognition of personhood.

Yes, but only in cities where it is safe. Focus on public transportation in rural areas where roads are unsafe for bikers.

Yes, increase promotion of bike use and bike-sharing programs, but do not develop costly bike lanes that go unused.

It should be allowed in bigger cities such as New York and Boston, where the Civilians mostly bike or walk.

I feel like this could work, but so many people here use cars anyway that I don't think it will amount to anything.

No, only because the layout of American city's is not conducive to biking even in some of the most densely populated ones.

Government should promote the use of bicycles. But government should hold accountable when bikers violate traffi laws, which bikers do all the time.

yes, we people need to fix the problome of using less vehicles but we could make safe derat pathes instead.

Yes, but only if bicyclists are held to stricter laws (i.e., stopping at traffic lights/stop signs and yielding for pedestrians).

Government should invest in a “bike path” instead of a bike lane. Cyclists would not have to be on the public road

No, the government should make separate roads for bikes separated by dividers and any bike that enters the motorized road should be pulled over and given a ticket.

It doesn't really matter to me, I don't believe that the use of vehicles is bad, but I don't mind riding bicycles. However, it may lead to more bicycle vs vehicle related accidents.

No, because cities and towns are built such that bikes cannot function effectively as transport even with promotion.

No, Biking is a hobby/sport People that bike to get around have plenty of space in places like Downtown Greenville.

Yes, but only if bike lakes are elevated and next to sidewalk away from the roadway. Also, bikes should be required to be registered and insured

The use of bicycles should be promoted, but the expanding of bike lanes and other bike programs shouldn't be.

No, bike lanes are too dangerous and disruptive to drivers. We should increase the number of sidewalks instead.

Yes, but only in areas where this is viable and does not lead to a road diet that increases traffic congestion.

I believe that the government should promote the use of bicycles by expanding bike lanes. Also, we should promote the use of cars less so, we don't kill the Earth almost entirely because we live on this Earth and I plan to have a better environment for everyone.

If it’s an area where things are close, such as in New York, things might speed up as more people could move around freely

No, it is super dangerous enough as it is. Bicyclists run through red lights, disobey road laws, and are obnoxious and unsafe.

We should make cars more affordable to those who've resorted to using bikes at a understandable cost, or lower the price to buy a ticket for a bus stop

I think the government should rather promote the sidewalks to ensure easier transportation for all non vehicles.

Yes but they need to find ways to make it safer first. Lots of people drive right through the bike lane.

Only if there is enough room for these lanes to be put in not too close to driving ones, and only if they didn't take up too much space themselves.

Yes- Promoting is fine as long as the bike lines are clearly bike lanes and do not interfere with vehicle traffic, I’m supportive. But, rushing somewhere to get a sick child and to have a bike blocking you is VERY frustrating.

in larger densely populated cities we should infest in public transport, bike lanes while nice but most are not safe to use in most states.

This question isn't really relevant but it would be nice to expand the lanes because people have to make a big curve away from the bikers because the bikers can't stay in the lane from it being so small.

Though the concept would promote health as well as a decrease in fossil fuels from cars, it can't ensure that people will actually take advantage of the proposal. It may be ignored by the public.

In certain areas where bikes can actually bring you places, like a city where everything is somewhat close, but not as much in more rural areas

Although bicycle use should be promoted more, this issue is not pressing and not a lot of funds should be allocated to this in 2024

This should be decided at the local level of government, based on the needs of the community. This should not be a federal decision.

No, Mixing bikes and cars in the same lanes is dangerous for the bicyclists, especially with more distracted drivers, so widening the sidewalks and having markers for pedestrians and bicyclists is a better solution.

It should depend on the area. It should be a case-by-case issue that takes into account distance and safety of the area.

yes but not sharing the roads with bicycles. if this will be done, there needs to be clear lanes that do NOT impede traffic.

Yes, but only within specific urbanized areas. Bike lanes in suburban areas are under-utilized and a waste of money

It doesn’t necessarily need to promote it but some money could be used for better bike lanes and sidewalks

Yes, but only in a way where bikers can be protected from the much larger vehicles operating the same space

Yes. Everyone deserves to choose their route and means of transportation, including public transit vehicles, personal cars, or bicycles. By providing a designated space for cyclists, bike lanes reduce the risk of collisions between cyclists and motor vehicles.

If the national government wants to promote it that's fine as long as its only promotion. This should be left up to the states and local governments to implement.

Not if it takes away space from the roads. Too many urban roads are not efficient anymore because valuable lane space is taken for the occasional bicycle that may use the lane.

No, we can learn from Japans by expanding sidewalks slightly for bikes without touching the road. America is still very much a car dependent country.

Yes in certain area's because in some area's the use of bike lanes would only increase traffic and accidents.

Who is "the government" in this question? This is something that could work at the local and state levels

Yes, but existing car based city infrastructure makes it difficult and would require more than just expanding bike lanes

sure, I don't really care, might help traffic but most people won't choose to bike places if they can drive especially if they live anywhere but a city.

they should add bicycle lanes in places where it would be most effective like warm places all year around and smaller cities so you can use bikes to get from side of the city to the other by only using bikes

I think an increase in bike lanes will be great but realistically its just not sustainable for everyday use.

Yes, so long as the proposed bike lanes do not cause increased traffic and congestion on the roadways they are installed.

improve public transportation like high speed trains, that are usable. american cities aren't built for bicycles to be a serious mode of transportation

Only if there is already an alternative efficient public transportation route that runs parallel that takes cars off the street. Government can afford by then by stop the funding of wars and military

Yes, but bikes must conform to laws and regulations to ensure safety of both cyclists and car drivers.

There should be more accessibility of public bikes, but bike lanes can be dangerous as they're often confusing for drivers.

yes, in areas where it is appropriate. I cannot imaging using bikes in Phoenix in the summertime or in the wintertime in northern Minnesota

No, it should be done on a local level as weather can greatly impact the usage of bikes/scooters/etc.

no i think this would be bad due to less lanes for cars which means more traffic much means for congestion is cities.

Only when it makes sense and the streets are wide enough. Rapid & public transportation systems should be better to reduce congestion.

Bike lanes do not increase the use of bicycles for transportation purposes and do not substantially increase the safety of cyclists unless designed correctly.

This should be local, and it should be used on streets where it wouldn't interrupt traffic flow. Implement it little-by-little to see if there's actually people using bikes to get around.

Yes, but not at the expend of impeding traffic and enforce bike laws the same as traffic violations.

As we invest into other methods of public transportation (rail and bus), increased space for bicycle traffic will become available as a byproduct.

Yes, it would help the green-house emissions and would lower the obesity and heart attack rate in people.

No unless bicycle owners are required to pay the same taxes for public roadway use as automobile owners.

yes, but primarily in urban cities where lack of sidewalks actively cause unsafe conditions for healthy modes of transportation

Absolutely, the environment would be far healthier and it would make traversing without a vehicle far safer.

Yes, as long as it doesn't interfere or remove from already existing lanes for any type of transport

No if the bicycles can't go a vehicle then they need parks or some where safer to ride their bike. Even bicycle lanes take up space on the road.

Yes; however, the existing roads and sidewalks are sufficient without an extra lane. Also, make sure drivers pay attention to cyclists when they are on the road.

Only after construction of other public transportation like trains are built. Then, it will depend on car traffic.

No, bicycles are dangerous to vehicles on the road and cause unnecessary extension in travel time. They should be removed from roadways. If bike lanes are added, motorcycles should be allowed to use them fully.