Should the government promote the use of bicycles by expanding bike lanes and bike-sharing programs?

No

Yes, and a real bike lane with barriers is better than a painted 'bike lane' that's almost worse than no bike lane at all.

Yes, as long as the cycling infrastructure is built reasonably to where it does not cause problems to drivers and pedestrians.

It depends because a lot of citizens all over the world will walk in the bike lanes causing the bikers having to swerve out of the lanes and potentially getting hit by a car. So in my opinion I would say yes but there are a lot of situations that needs to be taken into account for.

No. Until other forms of public transit become commonplace, bicycles in urban areas are dangerous to drivers and bicyclists on roads dominated by motor vehicles. Additionally, this campaign would only impact urban areas and the sunk cost of this promotion would do nothing to help rural areas.

i believe that roads in general need to be redesigned so that going places always doesn’t require a car. other countries have a nice roadmap to where everything is accessible. i also think this would allow more youth to spend time outside as going out would be a lot easier as opposed to having an adult drive you.

We need a transportation revolution that puts people and the planet first. By investing in safe cycling infrastructure, expanding public transit, and promoting alternative transportation options, we can create healthier, more sustainable, and more equitable communities. It's time for a balanced approach that prioritizes the needs of all road users while ensuring responsible use of taxpayer dollars.

Yes, but it should be done on the local level. I live in an area that has bike lanes that are rarely used. Some would say this is a waste of money. Other locations have a higher need/want for it and thus should look into implementing.

In cities like mine not everything is that close so you kind of need to drive, but in big cities, it makes sense and should.

Yes, but mostly in urban centers, rather than in sprawling communities

No, automobiles are the most effective mode of transportation, bike paths should be kept seperate from roads

They should implemet this slowly since in some states the only way to get somewhere is in only a car.

The government should promote the use of bicycles, but only put money towards the upkeep of the current bike lanes & bike sharing programs

Yes, especially in highly commutable areas like New York City. It will help the environment, be cheaper for the individual as they won't have to waste as much gas and it will promote better physical health and exercise.

Yes, but only programs and infrastructure that have been shown to increase safety and reduce congestion.

Allow the cities and states to have that choice for the sake of freedom, the constitution, capitalism, weak government, checks and balances, and the 10th and 14th amendments.

For the sake of freedom, capitalism, weak government, federalism, the constitution, the 10th and 14th amendments, and checks and balances, it should be up to the states and cities

For environmental purposes it could be helpful, but just expanding roads would be hard for the introduction of more bike usage.

Local and state governments should be free to, but the national government has more pressing concerns

Yes, because it can help with the car pollution and since America has the most obese people it can help to reduce that

No. This will result in higher traffic, higher taxes, and a higher national debt. Also, it should not be up to the government for the sake of freedom, capitalism, weak government, checks and balances, and federalism.

Yes, and if bikers are caught breaking road and traffic laws, they should be punished as equally as auto drivers.

Yes, provided those bike lanes do not make it more difficult for the working class communitng from the suburbs

It should be allowed in bigger cities such as New York and Boston, where the Civilians mostly bike or walk.

I feel like this could work, but so many people here use cars anyway that I don't think it will amount to anything.

No, that is not any of the government's business .Instead their should be local incentives to do so.

Yes. Make communities knit more tightly together by encouraging using bicycles and going outside more. I think there should also be places in communities where cars are not allowed, but things like bikes and scooters, of course, are.

Yes, but only in places where it would be beneficial, and not cause inconvenience, for the people who live there

Yes. But also make it standard to include training wheels in every bicycle to make them easier to ride.

No, not until the majority of cities in the US are actually bike and pedestrian friendly, as using a bike in many places is unreasonable.

No, instead we should get rid of bike lanes altogether since they limit space on the already congested roads.

No, only because the layout of American city's is not conducive to biking even in some of the most densely populated ones.

Government should promote the use of bicycles. But government should hold accountable when bikers violate traffi laws, which bikers do all the time.

yes, we people need to fix the problome of using less vehicles but we could make safe derat pathes instead.

Yes, but only if bicyclists are held to stricter laws (i.e., stopping at traffic lights/stop signs and yielding for pedestrians).

Government should invest in a “bike path” instead of a bike lane. Cyclists would not have to be on the public road

No, the government should make separate roads for bikes separated by dividers and any bike that enters the motorized road should be pulled over and given a ticket.

It doesn't really matter to me, I don't believe that the use of vehicles is bad, but I don't mind riding bicycles. However, it may lead to more bicycle vs vehicle related accidents.

No, because cities and towns are built such that bikes cannot function effectively as transport even with promotion.

No, Biking is a hobby/sport People that bike to get around have plenty of space in places like Downtown Greenville.

Yes, but only if bike lakes are elevated and next to sidewalk away from the roadway. Also, bikes should be required to be registered and insured

The use of bicycles should be promoted, but the expanding of bike lanes and other bike programs shouldn't be.

No, bike lanes are too dangerous and disruptive to drivers. We should increase the number of sidewalks instead.

Yes, but only in areas where this is viable and does not lead to a road diet that increases traffic congestion.

I believe that the government should promote the use of bicycles by expanding bike lanes. Also, we should promote the use of cars less so, we don't kill the Earth almost entirely because we live on this Earth and I plan to have a better environment for everyone.

If it’s an area where things are close, such as in New York, things might speed up as more people could move around freely

No, it is super dangerous enough as it is. Bicyclists run through red lights, disobey road laws, and are obnoxious and unsafe.

We should make cars more affordable to those who've resorted to using bikes at a understandable cost, or lower the price to buy a ticket for a bus stop

I think the government should rather promote the sidewalks to ensure easier transportation for all non vehicles.

Yes but they need to find ways to make it safer first. Lots of people drive right through the bike lane.

Only if there is enough room for these lanes to be put in not too close to driving ones, and only if they didn't take up too much space themselves.

Yes- Promoting is fine as long as the bike lines are clearly bike lanes and do not interfere with vehicle traffic, I’m supportive. But, rushing somewhere to get a sick child and to have a bike blocking you is VERY frustrating.

in larger densely populated cities we should infest in public transport, bike lanes while nice but most are not safe to use in most states.

This question isn't really relevant but it would be nice to expand the lanes because people have to make a big curve away from the bikers because the bikers can't stay in the lane from it being so small.

Though the concept would promote health as well as a decrease in fossil fuels from cars, it can't ensure that people will actually take advantage of the proposal. It may be ignored by the public.

In certain areas where bikes can actually bring you places, like a city where everything is somewhat close, but not as much in more rural areas

Although bicycle use should be promoted more, this issue is not pressing and not a lot of funds should be allocated to this in 2024

This should be decided at the local level of government, based on the needs of the community. This should not be a federal decision.

No, Mixing bikes and cars in the same lanes is dangerous for the bicyclists, especially with more distracted drivers, so widening the sidewalks and having markers for pedestrians and bicyclists is a better solution.

It should depend on the area. It should be a case-by-case issue that takes into account distance and safety of the area.

yes but not sharing the roads with bicycles. if this will be done, there needs to be clear lanes that do NOT impede traffic.

Yes, but only within specific urbanized areas. Bike lanes in suburban areas are under-utilized and a waste of money

It doesn’t necessarily need to promote it but some money could be used for better bike lanes and sidewalks

Yes, but only in a way where bikers can be protected from the much larger vehicles operating the same space

Yes. Everyone deserves to choose their route and means of transportation, including public transit vehicles, personal cars, or bicycles. By providing a designated space for cyclists, bike lanes reduce the risk of collisions between cyclists and motor vehicles.

If the national government wants to promote it that's fine as long as its only promotion. This should be left up to the states and local governments to implement.

Not if it takes away space from the roads. Too many urban roads are not efficient anymore because valuable lane space is taken for the occasional bicycle that may use the lane.

No, we can learn from Japans by expanding sidewalks slightly for bikes without touching the road. America is still very much a car dependent country.

Yes in certain area's because in some area's the use of bike lanes would only increase traffic and accidents.

Who is "the government" in this question? This is something that could work at the local and state levels

Yes, but existing car based city infrastructure makes it difficult and would require more than just expanding bike lanes

sure, I don't really care, might help traffic but most people won't choose to bike places if they can drive especially if they live anywhere but a city.

they should add bicycle lanes in places where it would be most effective like warm places all year around and smaller cities so you can use bikes to get from side of the city to the other by only using bikes

I think an increase in bike lanes will be great but realistically its just not sustainable for everyday use.

Yes, so long as the proposed bike lanes do not cause increased traffic and congestion on the roadways they are installed.

improve public transportation like high speed trains, that are usable. american cities aren't built for bicycles to be a serious mode of transportation

Only if there is already an alternative efficient public transportation route that runs parallel that takes cars off the street. Government can afford by then by stop the funding of wars and military

Yes, but bikes must conform to laws and regulations to ensure safety of both cyclists and car drivers.

There should be more accessibility of public bikes, but bike lanes can be dangerous as they're often confusing for drivers.

yes, in areas where it is appropriate. I cannot imaging using bikes in Phoenix in the summertime or in the wintertime in northern Minnesota

No, it should be done on a local level as weather can greatly impact the usage of bikes/scooters/etc.

no i think this would be bad due to less lanes for cars which means more traffic much means for congestion is cities.