Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of University Debt Accountability

3k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How would your perspective on college change if tuition were free, and how might that impact society?

 @9WR5FST from Florida  answered…8mos8MO

College is not what it used to be. Seems to me a waste of time and money for a large portion of the student body. A degree in social activism, really?

 @ColomboSocialist from Michigan  disagreed…5mos5MO

A degree in social activism, really?

Social activism is a major you can choose, not a degree. You would have to take courses in political science, economics, social engineering, and other related fields. Not to mention the required courses in Math, Statistics, Writing, and other essentials. It's a lot more difficult than just picking one thing to learn and getting a piece of paper for it. A social activist could get a job working for the Child Protective Services, Unemployment Agencies, journalism, or public administration. A major is just something you want to specialize in. The degree would be a Bachelor of Arts or Master of Arts.

 @9VLS2L7 from Utah  answered…9mos9MO

I have zero plans to go to college right now, but if it would be affordable of course I would and I would likely be better off in life. Society would be smarter, and it would likely stimulate the economy with the improved job availability.

 @9VLN4QJLibertarian from New York  commented…9mos9MO

It would not stimulate the economic most college student just don’t used their degree.😂

 @ColomboSocialist from Michigan  disagreed…5mos5MO

70.2% of recent bachelor recipients are employed, while only 32.4% of recent high school graduates are employed. College students use their degrees to get employment. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/hsgec.nr0.htm

 @9VLPT5PRepublican from California  answered…9mos9MO

if tuition were to be free in collage the literacy rates would spike tremendously creating a well educated society.

 @9WR696D from Pennsylvania  answered…8mos8MO

I think it would make our labor force more productive, competitive, educated, and happy.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, and higher education should be free for everyone

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, it is the student’s responsibility to manage their financial outcome

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

Yes, but more liability for lower income degrees and minimal to no liability for high income degrees

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if they are for profit universities

 @9R99ZZD  from Wisconsin  answered…12mos12MO

No, and higher education should be free for everyone. Furthermore, there should be standards on how much a job should pay if it requires a degree. A job that requires a Bachelor, master's, or doctorate should more than pay enough to pay for associated student debt. So, regulate minimums.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How do you think student loan debt impacts mental health, and is enough attention given to this issue?

 @9YG2QT9 from Wisconsin  answered…8mos8MO

I see people having mental breakdowns on the daily because they cannot repay their student loans. We need to cut those loans and help those students.

 @9YG376J from New York  answered…8mos8MO

Student loan debt negatively effects mental health and I would like to see more attention given to it.

 @9YFZLDWanswered…8mos8MO

Student Loan Debt certainly depresses the finances of many Americans, and though sufficient attention is afforded to the issue, insufficient actions have been effectuated to address this dilemma.

 @9YFZ6K4 from Alaska  answered…8mos8MO

It impacts it massively, imagine having to grapple with the fact that 45 years from now you might still be paying off the math class that you are currently studying for a test in

 @9FQG2VJ from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

No, it’s the students responsibility to manage their financial outcome, but the price to earn a higher education should be lowered.

 @9FQNVNJ from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

yes, university should explain the financial viability of degrees and all students need to go to financial literacy course before taking on debt

 @9WVLX9J from Michigan  answered…8mos8MO

No, the student is responsible for paying back their loan at the end of the day. However, loan interest rates should be significantly lowered and reevaluated.

 @9VJVCC8  from North Dakota  answered…9mos9MO

it is the student’s responsibility to manage their financial outcome, but the cost of education should be reduced.

 @9GDSQ54 from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

No, and higher education should be free for everyone No, we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education No, it is the student’s responsibility to manage their financial outcome

 @92YHQCV  from California  answered…1yr1Y

The Answer depends on the College, but we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education until it's free because higher education should be free for everyone

 @B5X32CW from California  answered…2wks2W

yes if they are for profit universities and we should also focus on lowering tuition costs for all universities and community colleges

 @Brandonnoe84Libertarian  from Colorado  answered…1yr1Y

Engaged University Debt Accountability

Yes, while it is the students responsibility to manage their financial outcome, it is the colleges responsibility and financing companies to only give out loans to people who are able to pay them back.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How do you think student loan debt affects your decisions about your future career or life goals?

 @9YFL57N from California  answered…8mos8MO

If I were to go to college, it would depend on how you're doing financially, and it may change your choice on what school you go to because of the money you owe.

 @9TNKSGB from Illinois  answered…10mos10MO

the more debt you have the harder it is to move on from and many people may not follow their dreams or achieve their American dream because of the fear of the enormous debt that comes with schooling.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

In your view, who should bear the brunt of student loan debt—the student, the university, or society?

 @9TQSZ39 from Arizona  answered…10mos10MO

 @9THXN4BRepublican from Minnesota  commented…10mos10MO

I think that the student should be responsible for the debt because it was there chose to go not the unversity

 @9GWFLNS from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the students should be held responsible for their own finances but also should have an optional class to help with financial responsibility

 @B5TYLNLRepublican from Texas  answered…3wks3W

Colleges and universities should not allow student loans beyond a certain percentage of the total cost of the education so students don’t incur the high debt

 @B5TFPHLDemocrat  from Wisconsin  answered…3wks3W

No, College should be free for lower to middle income families. High income families can pay for their child's education.

 @B5SSL9Pfrom Maine  answered…3wks3W

Yes, but only if they are for profit universities and make the liability proportional to the expected yearly income of the degree offered

 @B5RF45YDemocrat from Virginia  answered…4wks4W

Graduates should be able to request a refund of tuition after 5 years if they can not land a career related to their degree despite a reasonable effort to do so.

 @B5P67FS from Illinois  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, only if it one these Made-up degrees that no jobs are looking for. As for that they should offer more support for helping to find/getting a job well also help offer information on the major they are going into.

 @B5P358K from Washington  answered…1mo1MO

colleges should be held partly responsible, however they should still let students graduate without having to go into terrible debts.

 @B5KJZRKanswered…2mos2MO

No, But they should offer a reasonable amount of resources for job placement and networking support.

 @AAbattery444Progressive  from New Jersey  answered…2mos2MO

Yes—colleges (public and private) should share in the cost of student defaults, scaled to a program’s median graduate earnings, alongside stronger tuition-controls and career-advising safeguards.

 @B5J4DSX from Massachusetts  answered…2mos2MO

If they are handing out loans they know will not be repaid that is on them. But at the same time the students shouldn’t be without responsibility

 @B5CL6J9 from Wisconsin  answered…2mos2MO

No, we need to decrease the cost of education, and then it is most definitely the student's responsibility.

 @B58NX8HIndependent from Kansas  answered…2mos2MO

No education is free and college and schools should stop acting like a bank and start acting like a school

 @B58JJKS from Kansas  answered…2mos2MO

No, but schools need to stop acting like a bank and start acting like an educational institution instead of financial regulation institution

 @B567ZYGfrom Maine  answered…2mos2MO

I think that all people should get vaccinated, unless they have a medical condition which prohibits them from getting vaccinated because they will become dangerously sick.

 @B54JYWP from Idaho  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but higher education should be free for everyone and outstanding student loans should be forgiven.

 @B4ZGSD8 from Texas  answered…2mos2MO

It should depend on the reason for truancy.. Sickness, death, injury, should excuse it but, missing the bus or oversleeping is not an excuse.

 @B4XGFW8No Labels from California  answered…2mos2MO

No, and higher education should be free for everyone Yes, but only if they are for profit universities

 @B4VPF5N from New York  answered…2mos2MO

depends if the student goes to a low income job on purpose to ex-punch their student loans its 50/50

 @B4V42QN from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

As someone who this happened to, i am not completely unbiased. However, i do like option 4 the most, but i have noticed that what REALLY needs addressed is there is NO NETWORKING OR JOB PLACEMENT ASSISTANCE (OR IF THEY DO IT'S EXTREMELY LIMITED) logic; "i wouldn't have to hold Uni liable if i could get a qualified well paying job with employer stability in the first place. I am phi theta cappa with a 3.75 gpa and have too many Dean's List to count 5+++ and IQ well north of 140 and have no job prospects due to networking issues. I cant have kids and my uterus is wasting…  Read more

 @B4PXK3K from North Carolina  answered…3mos3MO

It is the student's responsibility, but in some cases the college could be held liable. It's better to decrease the cost of education instead.

 @B4KLCSB from California  answered…3mos3MO

I think that if colleges are advertizing that a certain degree will lead to a certain job or career field and the degree that the students get isn't useful anymore then the school should pay the students back their money

 @B4J2MQV from Ohio  answered…3mos3MO

People without degrees can still become rich. If it is truly the college's fault, then sure, they can assume liability. However, if a person chose a degree that won't earn them much money, and they aren't financially responsible, then no, it's not the college's fault.

 @4KBRM54 answered…3mos3MO

No, decrease the cost of education and incentivize education in industries needing more skilled labor.

 @B4FCJW4Republican from Georgia  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but it should be the victim's choice whether or not to do so or not for the sake of freedom, federalism, weak government, and checks and balances.

 @B4D6KHP from Georgia  answered…3mos3MO

For the sake of freedom, federalism, weak government, and checks and balances, it should be up to the victims on what to do with that.

 @B3SSJNF  from Illinois  answered…3mos3MO

establish a special billioonares and over 50 million tax that applies on all forms of income, hire back 50,000 irs agents to specifically only go after multi-millionares and billionares and dont allow them to move money to offhsore accoutns to circumvent without government approval and make ti free for everyone inclduing everyone who paid off in last 5 years and 50% paid back to those in last 10 years

 @B4D4XGL from Colorado  answered…3mos3MO

I feel it is a grey area and that in some cases the college could be sued but over all there should not be a policy as it is their will to go to that school.

 @B4BVFP4 from Florida  answered…3mos3MO

I believe college should be free and no one should have to pay to get a higher education especially if you are graduating from highschool with no money and then you have to pay 90,000 just to go to a good college for a year

 @B48ZGNN from Maryland  answered…3mos3MO

I support 100% loan forgiveness, followed by free in state tuition at public schools. For-profit private colleges and universities would be banned, while non-profits would have to be paid for by private means.

 @B46TQWRConstitution from Tennessee  answered…3mos3MO

No, but college counselors should warn students that certain degrees will lead to lower-income jobs.

 @B44H2ZL from Pennsylvania  answered…4mos4MO

Yes not only the college but the government as well, people should not be finally paying off their loans in their 30-40s and no one should ever go into debt for wanting to attend a higher education. Why is schooling free when we are kids when everyone knows you can't get far with only a high school degree, unless you plan to work blue collar that would be the only well paying job.

 @B3ZYM5D from Georgia  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only in cases of rip offs or false advertising for the sake of Law and Order but still have rights to attorneys and fair trials for the sake of freedom, the Constitution, a weak central government, federalism, and checks and balances

 @B3ZJ6TBPeace and Freedom from Indiana  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but ultimately I think we should strive to decrease the cost (or eliminate costs altogether) of higher education.

 @B3SSNPB from Missouri  answered…4mos4MO

yes, but it should be proportional to the yearly income of the degree, and mildly depend on if it's a profit university, but we should also really consider decrease or eliminate the cost of higher education to eliminate the issue altogether

 @B3QZ3CRfrom New York  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but more liability for lower income degrees and minimal to no liability for high income degrees

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, universities should co-sign federal loans and be held responsible if students default due to not getting a career in the same field as their degree

 @B35C8WLfrom Guam  answered…5mos5MO

Should uk labours prime minister only any risk on outcomes never thinks positive in attunement issued by Australia prime minister agreed in nice hands with economic rates

 @B2VVW64 from Iowa  answered…5mos5MO

No. but schools should counsel those students about their opportunities for income after graduation so those students are aware they are in a low-income field.

 @B2SV7NDRepublican from Utah  answered…5mos5MO

No, it is the student's responsibility, but we should also focus on decreasing the cost of education.

 @B2S884PNo Labels from New York  answered…5mos5MO

Though it's the student's responsibility to manage their finances, colleges should have a liability proportional to the expected yearly income for the offered degree.

 @B2PL35B from New Jersey  answered…5mos5MO

For-profit schools should be held liable for predatory practices, lies to young learners, and higher education should be provider on the cost of the degree vs the likely income and repayment, costs of education need to greatly decrease

 @B2JNN9V from Arkansas  answered…5mos5MO

No, but the federal government should prohibit subsidized student loans to attend universities with a high dropout rate and low graduation rate.

 @9ZVFP2LNo Labels from Arizona  answered…7mos7MO

no the college is in the business of selling you an "education" not an outcome. so if a student gets a very successful job should the college charge them more? if the answer is no to that, they should not be held liable for the outcome. the student made several choices including which college they went to.

 @9ZS445V from Pennsylvania  answered…7mos7MO

The entire educational system needs to be reworked so that it teaches children life skills and how to succeed once they reach adulthood while also being taught street smart skills. Colleges should be ONLY for those who need EXTENSIVE education in very advanced fields in controlled safe environments and ONLY if they can truly find success in that field. They should receive no more than a full semester at a large discount to ensure they remain a good fit and after that, if they continue, should be financially liable for everything from there on out.

 @9ZKDMHJfrom Virgin Islands  answered…8mos8MO

No, but the universities should be required to give statistics about the likelihood of this happening

 @9ZJJ5XH from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

I think there should be support groups for helping these people pay off their loans so then people aren't getting into these situations.

 @9ZDHGHP from Tennessee  answered…8mos8MO

As long as they are publically funded, even if in part, if a portion of their student population isn't properly educated on the amount of money they will typically make for each major and have an almost insurmountable loan amount, they should be punished or radically incentivized to keep their student population educated

 @9YGXH8R from California  answered…8mos8MO

I think that if they cannot pay the money and it seems they can't then I think that some of the money should be let off the person so the money can be paid easier.

 @9YGBHDX  from Oklahoma  answered…8mos8MO

I believe each degree should vary in cost according to likely financial profit for student in their field, rather than being based on the institution itself.

I believe there should be more forgiveness options for individuals who are unable to continue work in their field post-graduation.

I believe we should provide better training for high school & college students on finance, budgeting, cost-of-living, purchasing a home, expenses involved in raising a family, etc.

I believe we should decrease the cost of education! Germany provides free education, and they are doing well as a nation economically.

 @9Y9MRWK from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

There should be more scholarships and lower interest rates for 4-year education for careers resulting in lower income jobs, like teaching, but not for masters and doctorate programs.

 @9Y5BVVP  from Pennsylvania  answered…8mos8MO

No, but we need to decrease the incentives for colleges to offer student loans by making the colleges themselves the loaning entity.

 @9Y4QMBP from Georgia  answered…8mos8MO

if the student was misled by the university on potential jobs that could be obtained with the degree

 @9XRJ4RX from New York  answered…8mos8MO

Provide better financial education so young students understand the field they are going into and what they could possibly end up making

 @9XR6ZP4  from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

Yes for liability proportional to expected yearly income (for those who are already in debt for their tuition AND also make higher education free for everyone for those not yet in debt &/or who are going back to school after going in debt for a previous period of study.)

 @9XP443R from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

No, students should be responsible to manage their financial outcomes, but we should also decrease the cost of education, and it should be harder to get a loan for a kid especially when it's really expensive. People should save up before going to school a few years, find more scholarships, and consider state schools and 2 year schools and trade schools that May be more affordable.

 @9XN5WFP from Ohio  answered…8mos8MO

Yes to an extent, but only if they got a job in the field that they have their degree in. College is a waste of time and money for a lot of americans.

 @9XN53K8 from California  answered…8mos8MO

It is the student's responsibility on their financial outcome but we should also end subsidies for colleges.

 @9XMMTTM from California  answered…8mos8MO

We should decrease the cost of education by making government not involved in student loans and stuff.

 @9XJ58Z6Independent from Maryland  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, and the cost of an education/tuition should vary based on reasonable expectations of future earnings.

 @9XHRSPV from Utah  answered…8mos8MO

I think funding from colleges to students should be limited based on the projected earning potential of the degree.

 @9XFZ2N5 from Iowa  answered…8mos8MO

No, schools should be held accountable to the quality of preparation for the student along with curriculum choices

 @9XFW5PBIndependent from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

Cost should be based on the average salary in the field a student wants to major in costing half of the annual average income for the position.

 @9XDPBXR from Kansas  answered…8mos8MO

No, it's the students financial responsibility and lenders should be allowed to assess students desired degree before lending

 @9X9RQYP from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

No but universities should use a national standard for employment in relevant field after graduation, schools lie constantly on this.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...