Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

6.2k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

Yes

 @9FMR87D from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

This would be an endless fight. Where do we draw the line? Do we really want to be fighting a war inside another countrys borders?

 @9FMXW5VRepublican from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Colombia, Venezuela, Mexico, and all through the Latin/Southern Americas are still crawled with cartels, their governments are failing, and the cartels are getting stronger, we need to do bigger actions to stop them.

 @9FD4N7J from Pennsylvania  agreed…2yrs2Y

Drugs brought in from borders such as Fentanyl has killed over 107,000. That is ridiculous we need to close the border

 @9G59LP7  from Illinois  asked for more information…2yrs2Y

That is ridiculous we need to close the border

I agree with you about the fentanyl stats, but I'm a little iffy on the border thing. while that may help us in the US, it sort of leaves everyone else affected by mexican drug cartels in the same spot they're in now, personally I think that if we want solve the problem we need to work together and use all of our resources to fix the violence problems associated with the cartels for good. I think closing the border would be a temporary fix, then it would come back as a much worse problem later.

 @GerrymanderAbigailLibertarian from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

I think closing the border would be a temporary fix, then it would come back as a much worse problem later.

Historical precedents show that closing off channels for illegal activities often leads to the emergence of new, more sophisticated methods. A great example is the Prohibition era in the U.S. When alcohol was banned, it didn't stop consumption—instead, it led to the rise of underground speakeasies and empowered organized crime syndicates. Similarly, closing the border might result in cartels finding alternative routes or methods for drug trafficking, potentially exacerbating the issue.

As you've suggested, addressing the root causes of the violence and instability that allow drug cartels to thrive seems to be a more sustainable solution. What do you think those root causes might be, and how could they be effectively addressed?

 @9L785CZ  from Illinois  commented…1yr1Y

I would fix our "healthcare" system and turn it into a lifetime educational and support system. For medical and emotional health, because the USA's current system is for profit businesses that don't care about helping people to be healthy and prevent addictions, illnesses, diseases and sickness of the over all body and mind.

But that would just be my start, the rest is not much to write.

 @9GNDS8Vagreed…2yrs2Y

the Mexican military lost to the Sinaloa cartel after the military accidently captured the leader's son.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No

 @9FR72HN from Arizona  agreed…2yrs2Y

The US military is a hammer. Drug cartels are a screw. Use the right tool for the job which is federal and local law enforcement.

 @9GMPDQG from Nevada  agreed…2yrs2Y

It's not just Hispanics who are "bringing drugs" It's also Americans who are paying for drugs. Instead of trying to harm the Hispanics the government should try and find who is buying these "drugs" and arrest them.

 @9FP2QVS from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

Once the United States starts interfering more and more in political issues in Mexico they will want to have a bigger role.

 @9FVLQGX from Georgia  agreed…2yrs2Y

There could be many consequences for involving the military like increased violence and civilian casualties. Although the military may seem like a good thing to stop Mexican drug cartels we have to ask ourselves is this decision going to cause more issues in the long-run.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for operations within our country’s borders

 @9G35DZN  from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The Republicans somehow always talk about “we need to focus on America” yet want to be involved in Mexico’s business, all because they know, if they just point and say “look! At all those scary brown people” that their voter base will do whatever they say.

We need to stay outta Mexico’s business and actually focus on helping those migrates, that bravely go through barbed wire, men on horses with whips, all to give themselves and their children a better life.

We praise pilgrims from coming in on ships, illegally, and killing millions of the true original Americans, but when an innocent family of four, legally, approach the border, for citizenship, we call them drug dealers and criminals?

Sounds about white 👀

 @9G3MZX8Republican from Nevada  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I am not white, but I am a strong advocate for equality. When I came to the United States of America, I had to go through the legal system and wait for years to obtain a visa. I believe it is unfair that some foreigners can enter the country illegally without going through the proper process. The issue at hand is that illegal entry is being justified by using the history of natives and white Americans to bully the system. America does not deny any foreigners their American dreams, but we all must follow the legal process, plain and simple.

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…2mos2MO

Yes, but only for operations within our country’s borders

If their operations are within our borders, it becomes our business

 @9G3MZX8Republican from Nevada  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I am not white, but I am a strong advocate for equality. When I came to the United States of America, I had to go through the legal system and wait for years to obtain a visa. I believe it is unfair that some foreigners can enter the country illegally without going through the proper process. The issue at hand is that illegal entry is being justified by using the history of natives and white Americans to bully the system. America does not deny any foreigners their American dreams, but we all must follow the legal process, plain and simple.

 @9FVLQGX from Georgia  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Top Disagreement

My best counter argument would be that using military on Mexican drug cartels would just make the situation worse

 @9FP2QVS from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The borders are the responsibility of both nations, so the border is also a concern of the United States.

 @9FMR87D from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Impractical because too difficult/complex to determine what activity constitutes "cartel activity" within the US

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, legalize all drugs instead

 @9G35DZN  from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

Legalization doesn’t mean no regulations are rules. Alcohol has always, does, and will continue to kill and cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands a year, but look what happened during the Prohibition.

If alcohol is allowed, so should all drugs.

And all drugs, like alcohol, need to be federally regulated, and nobody under 21 should be allowed access, same age for cigarettes and alcohol.

 @9F6TBF7 from New York  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Even if we were to legalize all drugs, that would not stop the cartels. We need to deal with them by force

 @9FL54FZ from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Several countries (most notably Portugal) have had significant reductions in drug overdoses and harms to society when responsibly decriminalizing hard drugs. By continuing our counter-productive war on drugs, we harm our own people and give huge piles of money to the worst international criminals and terrorists.

 @9F9H53W from Florida  disagreed…2yrs2Y

It is a stupid belief as the legalization of drugs will create worse conditions and bring the death toll higher.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, we already have agencies that address these issues

 @9GJBGHZRepublican  from North Carolina  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Top Disagreement

Why is it taking them so long to end the cartel? Are they being paid enough or is it that they are but are doing nothing about it. Do they have access to he some equipment as the military? Do they need military assistance? What’s taking them so long? Is the Mexican government working with the cartel? If so we should just declare war on them.

 @9GKSGV7Women’s Equalityagreed…2yrs2Y

the dea should take full force in bringing them down as they are a treat to both mexico and the usa with drug trafficing and human trafficing

 @9GKT9RB from Nevada  agreed…2yrs2Y

I do not think we should declare war on Mexico but the CIA is definitely letting the cartels getting away with stuff,

 @9GKSX6LCA Common Sense from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

The reason mexico is taking them so long to end the cartel is due to the numbers of cartels that there is in mexico. If mexico keeps pushing to fight cartels it could end up in a Civil War.

 @9GKQK4VRepublican from Nevada  agreed…2yrs2Y

The Cartels are a mighty entity in the Mexican government, and although part of the Mexican government is trying to do something about the issue; Mexico does not have enough money or power to do something against them. Instead of declaring war, it would be more favorable to help the government deal with the cartels as Mexico is now responsible for most production-related needs even surpassing China.

 @9GKPVD2 from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I think that it is apparent that Mexican drug cartels are still a problem and not being put completely in check.

 @9FMXW5VRepublican from Washington  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The Drug Cartels are still carrying on business just as normal, obviously these agencies have done nearly nothing.

 @9FGS26L from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

The U.S. Border Patrol has multiple patrols and checkpoints far away from the border for this specific issue and they are specialists in the field. The military would help but it would be better to hire and train more border patrol agents.

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only if coordinated with Mexico's government

 @9T6VJLDfrom Guam  disagreed…10mos10MO

The us has a history of negatively impacting the countries they become militarily involved with, working with the government makes no difference if the government is seething with corruption. The existence of cartels in Mexico is a far deeper problem that goes beyond an internal defense crisis.

 @9T5Q4NR from Illinois  disagreed…10mos10MO

If the United States does something to the wrong group of people, there could be American casualties because the government can't protect everyone all the time.

 @9SW6YJWLibertarian from Texas  disagreed…10mos10MO

Mexico’s government is corrupt and in the pockets of the cartels and can not be trusted to effectively deal with the cartels.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If the military action against cartels were successful, what changes do you think you might see in your community?

 @9H94JVX from California  answered…2yrs2Y

I think there would be more discrimination towards the Latino community since we're seen as drug dealers.

 @9H952CH from Arkansas  commented…2yrs2Y

I think not all people who are Latino are viewed this way but if something becomes a problem and your race is responsible then that is just how it is.

 @9H8VXHMPeace and Freedom from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I believe people are right in believing that sending the military to deal with this situation can lead to unnecessary civilian deaths. It also won't completely solve the problem with drugs as in certain states certain drugs are legal while being illegal in other states.

 @9H8MJ35Green from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D4Z9ZKRepublican from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9B2J8JS from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FG557K from New Mexico  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for operations within our country’s borders, and if only when Mexico asks for help.

 @99PQTXX from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F9YKKQ from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

Do you believe it's possible to handle the drug crisis without involving military force, and if so, how?

 @9V3DR3FDemocrat from Minnesota  answered…9mos9MO

No, sadly I have seen the destruction first hand of the Mexican Drug Cartels, and the only way to stop the Mexican Drug Cartel would be a systematic change using military force. I wish there would be some other way, but I feel there is too much destruction within the drug business, and it is a situation where fire must be fought with fire. What El salvador did was a clear human rights violation, so I don't think that would be fair, because even though I think military force is neccessary, I think we shouldn't give up our morals and ethics to win, because sometimes the ends don'…  Read more

 @9V3CLQS from Illinois  answered…9mos9MO

 @9V3BXC5 from California  answered…9mos9MO

I think that the government should try to control it without the military until it comes down to using the military

 @9TNN286 from Pennsylvania  answered…10mos10MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How would you feel if military intervention led to the loss of innocent lives but helped reduce drug-related deaths in the U.S.?

 @9YFG8M9answered…8mos8MO

That isn't good. It depends on how many people were innocently killed, and the impact of the operations. If its greater than 4, there is a problem.

 @9TJGW82 from Nevada  answered…10mos10MO

i think its a hard choice, but it would be worth it with the millions of possible drug attics we would save from addiction.

 @9TJGVFCfrom Vermont  answered…10mos10MO

Pretty bad. If military intervention is necessary, then civilian casualties should be as limited as possible.

 @9TJGS9W from Nevada  answered…10mos10MO

 @9C49SSJ from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for operations within our country’s borders, unless Mexico asks for assistance

 @9FB462H from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CJJFX4 from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D7D9QVConstitution from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe that the potential for civilian casualties in Mexico can be justified by the aim to reduce drug-related deaths in the U.S.?

 @9H8GXBF from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9H8GXG2 from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

There will be no civilian casualties under the United States armed forces unless the cartels have made a situation in which human lives are put in danger.

 @9FDPH9WProgressive from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as the US military helps communities affected or provide relief once a cartel is busted.

 @VettedVoteSarahSocialistfrom Michigan  disagreed…2yrs2Y

That's an interesting perspective. However, the U.S. military isn't typically involved in relief efforts or community development. This role is often filled by non-military government agencies or NGOs. For instance, after the fall of Pablo Escobar in Colombia, it was primarily NGOs and local government that aided in rebuilding the community. Could there be a different, perhaps more suitable, way to ensure affected communities receive the necessary support following a cartel bust?

 @9D36XX9 from Oklahoma  answered…2yrs2Y

 @943QKSZ from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BHQTWF from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How would you feel if a family member was harmed because of a military operation against drug cartels?

 @9H8JB23 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

I would feel worried for my family member. Obviously it would mae me have bias but casualties and injuries are bound to happen in war.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

As a student, do you think military resources are better spent on foreign operations or domestic issues, such as education and healthcare?

 @9H8HDRP from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9KXTZW6 from Colorado  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only for operations within our country’s borders. And only if there is undeniable evidence they are indeed cartels.

 @9DDDR49from Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D5SP7N from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for operations within our country’s borders and in coordination/with permission with Mexico.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...