Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

7.9k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

Yes

 @9FPL67T from South Carolina  disagreed…2yrs2Y

All children under the age of seventeen should be required to go to school with a students being able to miss school if the school had approved the reason for the absence.

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…3mos3MO

The government has no right to tell kids what to do, only the child's parents have that authority. As long as the kid isn't committing crimes or participating in inhumane acts (such as gender transitioning surgeries or taking drugs), the government has no right to be involved. Parents can choose how they want their child to be educated, whether formally or informally.

 @9FSJN9V from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Children need to go to school to get an education. Higher education reduces crime and improves everyone else’s life.

 @9GJQRLQRepublican from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

No because the kids need to learn there subject.if they did not went to school they not going to know nothing in the real world.At least let them finish high school so they have experience if they encounter something they have to know.

 @9G7ZZWJ  from South Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

Sometimes the breaks that students are given are not sufficient because the main reason students want time off is mental exhaustion, not celebration of something. Said exhaustion can happen for many reasons and at many times.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

No

 @9GXB6PM  from Nevada  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I feel like school truancy is stupid because good kids who have hard things going on in life, and can't always be in school shouldn't have to bare consequences schools should at least speak with the students . But if a kid doesn't try and it naturally bad they should bare the consequences.

 @9H2CHT9 from New Mexico  disagreed…2yrs2Y

School truancy is an excuse to participate in these hard things in life such as gangs, drugs, and sexual relations so it should be outlawed.

 @B2Y4V36 from Illinois  commented…5mos5MO

#1 Engaged School Truancy

School truancy is simply the act of skipping school without a formal excuse. Although it CAN be used to participate in those things, so can anything else that frees up time that would otherwise be spent in a governmental institution. Should everyone's entire days be government-operated to prevent crime?

 @9H2C4ZF from Utah  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I agree with this statement because its saying that good kids get punished for what bad kids do and they dont get punished for it

 @9H2KZLK from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Those students may be good kids but no matter what is going on at home there should be a valiant effort in trying to come to school. There should be that conversation had with the family and the student but there needs to be some consequence on not coming to school each day.

 @9H2DDNL from Nebraska  agreed…2yrs2Y

If a child is not going to school, it is harming their education. If they are close to falling under that title of truancy, finding a way to continue education is important. Life is hard but a good school system can help a child who is missing too much school to stay on track.

  @DirtHutCaver2023Libertarian  from Colorado  disagreed…2yrs2Y

If the government shouldn't decriminalize school truancy, what will you do to make school more-engaging and educational? How will you provide better access to school for those who can't get to school easily? Etc.

Basically, how would you make school worth going to? At the moment, school isn't very worth going to, so I feel like it's not fair to punish kids for truancy. But, Idk.

 @9FSV989 from Nevada  disagreed…2yrs2Y

It should only be towards children who do not attend school on their own accord. If it is for a good reason they should not be marked truant as you never know what they are going through.

 @9H22JZH from Ohio  disagreed…2yrs2Y

My argument is that some kids can have problems at home, family emergencies, or lack of a way to get to school. They should not be criminalized if they're less than 10 minutes late or don't have transportation.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

Should parents be punished for their children's truancy, or is that unfair to parents facing difficult circumstances?

 @9TTJ644Independent from North Carolina  answered…10mos10MO

If the parent purposefully and forcefully isolate their kids from important educational activity, then they should be apprehended for indirect truancy and give the child educational assistance. If the child skips school too much, not being disciplined by his/her parents/guardian, then they should be imprisoned for truancy. Lack of discipline is not an excuse.

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…3mos3MO

Forcefully isolating their kids is bad yes. Skipping school out of the child's own will, and the parents not caring should not be a crime.

 @9TVL52MRepublican from Illinois  answered…10mos10MO

No, the parents (if not responsible) aren't responsible for their child's decisions when they aren't in their care.

 @9TVKLFX from Georgia  answered…10mos10MO

Truancy and school discipline are associated with a host of negative consequences, including a decline in academic achievement, a greater likelihood of dropping out of school, poor health and well-being outcomes, and an increased risk of involvement in the juvenile justice system.

 @9TVKY2C from California  answered…10mos10MO

It is unfair to parents who are facing difficulty with their kids being absent for more than 30 days. It is entirely the kids' fault.

 @8JJ29SS from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, however, if the absence is clearly a day that was skipped, students should not receive credit for anything due that day or assignments handed out that day. Fall on their own sword.

 @9DZQJQM from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No and make public schools stricter

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

Not attending school isn’t like missing jury duty, this is just a plain bad idea to keep.

 @8G4T258Patriotic Peoples from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

It should depend on the reason for truancy.. Sickness, death, injury, should excuse it but, missing the bus or oversleeping is not an excuse.

 @8LG9KGY from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

depends on what the problem is like doing school online ,its really easy to forget to do it because you can get busy with stuff at home

 @8HW3FSG from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

If a student skips school, do you think they should be punished or rather helped to figure out why they're skipping?

 @9XQTZ6JDemocrat from Ohio  answered…8mos8MO

We need to figure out why they're skipping, punishing them may only make the situation worse.

 @9TQVXNK from Maryland  answered…10mos10MO

I think they should be punished is they are old enough to understand that you shouldn't

 @9TQSKPT from Georgia  answered…10mos10MO

Figure out as punishing will only counter-incentivise them more, but in the case of a serial truant then punish if there's been no resolve.

 @9WY3V2N  from New Mexico  answered…8mos8MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

Have you ever felt that school wasn't a priority for you, and if so, why?

 @9YFVPC4  from South Carolina  answered…8mos8MO

During primary school, I didn’t think my education was important. It began to become more important as I became older, though. Especially since I am a male, all of my teachers until middle school were women and they treated us boys horribly. The teachers were highly unqualified because they did not know how to work with the other gender. I wish I had male teachers during primary school. I would have taken my education seriously.

 @9YFSM5C from Washington D.C.  answered…8mos8MO

I believe that the American education system fails majority of kids (including me), due to the lack of exploration, outdated curriculum, lack of student-teacher bonding, and producing hive mind thinking rather than individual and critical thinking.

 @9TQVL7VDemocrat from Indiana  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, because a private school had incredibly abusive policies and I felt like my education wasn't valued, but rather my punishment.

 @9TQTFDL from South Dakota  answered…10mos10MO

I think school has always been a priority for me. It has taught me many things that I would not have learned about without it.

 @8NPMJB3 from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9RXP9KX from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Yes, it is the school’s responsibility to punish students for unreasonable absence, not the government

 @8FR5YWN from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8FGKSQX from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

Truant students should not recieve jail time, but fines and other punishment are suitable.

 @8FK3M94 from Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

It shouldn't be jail time for the parents if the kids are giving them a hard time. Not only that, but when school systems are paying attention to attendance they tend to notice absence of children being abused at home. The schools shouldn't make it criminal for the parents because 10 absences at my high school was a truancy. Kids have doctor's and sick days not covered by insurance. Kids need mental health days and sometimes just need a day off.

 @B4S63J5Green from New York  answered…3mos3MO

No, but provide more exemptions for parents in the case that a student cannot go to school for a valid reason, including sickness/health issues.

 @9ZKPQXZ from Kansas  answered…8mos8MO

No, but instead of jail time/fines, it should be examined at the parental level. Oftentimes truancy is the cause of trouble at home.

 @9TP3NXB from Kentucky  answered…10mos10MO

It would be better to support and care for children and their families rather than simply punishing them.

 @9D3RPBQfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9LF5SCS from New Jersey  answered…1yr1Y

a student should not be criminalized for not attending school. More money and effort should be invested in school communities to address the core reasons why students drop out or avoid attending regularly.

 @9L74FFC from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

To an extent, yes; minor-aged students shouldn’t be jailed for it, but the parents absolutely should. This should be considered on an individual level, and the focus should be on the family dynamics that may be leading to truancy

 @9GZDTYYIndependent from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

School truancy laws should be left to the most local level of government that primarily controls education. That being said, I believe that deliberate absence from school without a reasonable excuse should not be a crime since for young individuals, school is essentially their job, which would make criminalizing school truancy akin to declaring skipping a work shift illegal, which is unreasonable since the consequences for skipping work should be determined by the employer and not the government, the exception of course being government institutions.

  @9FZMFMVIndependent from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

No, it is OK to miss school if you’re sick, injured or mourning the loss of a loved one, but allowing students to skip school whenever they feel like it, for no reason, will certainly lead to a dramatic climb in dropout and crime rates.

 @8FDNVTSDemocrat from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

No but each truancy case should be looked at individually and parents should not get jail time or fined if it is not their fault

 @8DMKCRG from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but there should be programs to deal with this better as to penalize the parent and figure out better solutions but for law enforcement to get involved it's too much.

 @8F4ZCHC from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Sometimes the kid learns more out of school than in school, but truancy is still bad.

 @8F4HDNV from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, unless the student has committed other crimes along with the truancy, the discipline should be up to the school system itself.

 @8QBRNB7 from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8DYSJSLRepublican from Idaho  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, students who refuse to learn should not be required to do so, though the consequences of that failure should be made clear to both student and parents.

 @8DYCYVZ from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8DGDGGV from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes. Students in poverty suffer from truancy more than middle class or wealthy students. Criminalizing truancy sets students up for failure. Instead school districts need to hire more case/ social workers to find out what is going on at home that leads to a child’s truancy.

 @8QFD7JG from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8FJ6TQS from Idaho  answered…5yrs5Y

No, it is their choice not wanting to be educated.

 @corvidiaGreen from Washington  commented…4yrs4Y

Yes

Did you mean "Yes - it should be decriminalized; it's their choice not to be educated"?

 @98YB59S from Alabama  answered…2yrs2Y

No, skipping school is never going to be decriminalized. But I do think schools should implement mental health days whereas students have up to 10 mental health days they can use per semester. Teachers will offer support for those that didn't receive instructions to do certain assignments if they were not there on a certain day.

 @B5YB8G6 from Nevada  answered…4 days4D

there should be a series of interventions that take place before this measure. jail time is extreme for kids and will only exacerbate an issue when theres likely a deeper reason why theyre not at school.

 @B5XZ6XZDemocratfrom Ohio  answered…6 days6D

Yes, it is insensitive an inept to expect children ESPECIALLY teens to want to walk into institutions where some are belittled and power is abused. Fix the institutions before reprimanding and penalizing those trying to escape it

 @B5X6NL2  from North Carolina  answered…1wk1W

No, but punishment should be reflected onto the student unless it is clear the parent is deliberately affecting truancy.

 @B5WRHXBfrom Maine  answered…2wks2W

Adolescents and teens do not understand fully to make the decision on the importance of education and attendance.

 @B5W4XMR from California  answered…2wks2W

Yes. This law harms those who have other responsibilities. However, disciplinary infractions should be held at school level and it should be handled on a case-by-case basis to ensure proper enforcement.

 @B5W4NYT from Kansas  answered…2wks2W

No, but should invest more into our schools to incentivize kids to go, especially in lower income communities.

 @B5VQV7L from Ohio  answered…2wks2W

This is hard because kids should be required to go to school; however, many poverty-stricken children are potentially unable to go to school always, and they should not be punished. Other similar reasons/excuses should be included

 @PoliticalBlonde  from Texas  answered…2wks2W

Yes, but only if there's 'reasonable cause' like family issues, mental health struggles, or unsafe school environments.

 @B5VMFPX from California  answered…2wks2W

Yes, unless students are skipping, ditching and not attending classes for no PRACTICAL reasoning without a parents/guardian consent.

 Deletedanswered…2wks2W

No, but punishments should be reflected onto the student not the parents, unless it is clear the parent is at fault. Jail time is extremely excessive.

 @B5TFSVLIndependent from Florida  answered…3wks3W

Yes, but incentivize learning and being educating or give them alternate forms of contributing to society.

 @B5SMMTV  from Texas  answered…3wks3W

The U.S. government shouldn't decriminalize school truancy, but immediately addressing root issues cause of student truancy.

 @B5SH7YZ  from Michigan  answered…3wks3W

Yes and spend those times and monies in finding out why the truancy and ways to prevent the truance.

 @B5QCTV5 from Pennsylvania  answered…4wks4W

Yes, but there should be a system in place to understand why truancy has become a problem for them and do something about it.

 @B5P23WH from Ohio  answered…1mo1MO

Depends. If the kid is skipping school just to skip school, then no. However, if the student is ill often, and cannot go to school due to the health risks, then yes.

 @B5NR942No Labels from Wisconsin  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but only for jail time for students. Adults should receive jail time if they are purposefully keeping their kids away from being educated.

 @B5N8YC8Green from Florida  answered…1mo1MO

No, parents should be held accountable if they are not allowing their child to attend school or keeping them from an education

 @B5MJY3NDemocrat from Pennsylvania  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but have a program to address why the student is truant and get them the resources to be in school.

 @B5LJWVF from Illinois  answered…1mo1MO

It should be circumstantial. For example, if the child who has missed days of school was unexcused and it was later discovered that it was due to something like poor mental health, a suicide attempt, financial issues within the home, or familial issues, it should not be criminalized and instead become excused. If both the guardian and student make no claims that it was any of the above mentioned, then it shall remain criminalized.

 @B5LD8GR  from Virginia  answered…1mo1MO

Decriminalize it, but require the missed time to be made up (or require comprehension testing) before K-12 graduation is possible.

 @B5KYVPZ from Texas  answered…1mo1MO

No, and the government should do more to ensure schools have the resources & require schools to investigate repeated, consecutive absences to ensure student safety & well-being. Too many children have fallen through the cracks and have been lost when nobody investigates their absence.

 @B5KXWX5Progressive from Michigan  answered…1mo1MO

If it is mental health issues or issues at school, they should be getting help and offered alternatives that still teach them but is flexible.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...