Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

4.9k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

Yes

 @9FZCXDM from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Preschool is something that many students have skipped and even then, they had succeeded greatly. There is not need to fund Preschool

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

No

 @9F6S8N9 from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

the government is centralized around education. we are expected to be fully educated by the time we are out of college, however, how are we supposed to be fully educated if the first building block costs more money that some people can pay

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

No, and all education should be privatized

 @9FV2C8P from Colorado  disagreed…2yrs2Y

As Simon Bolivar once stated "A people without education is like a building without a foundation", the underlying message in this quote is simply due to the foundations of the nation in itself reflect the education from the people to which a nation will progress or regress at a proportional rate to the education of the general population.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

Yes, as long as parents also have the option to send their child to private school

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

Yes, but funding should come from states instead of the federal government

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

 @959K74L from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95K7BH7 from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8NS2CDJ from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

I think it should be offered, but parents have a choice to send their child, keep them home, or send to private school.

 @8FPNF73 from Indiana  answered…5yrs5Y

It should be the parents' decision to send their child to preschool. Also, the state and the federal government should partially fund preschool and offer aid for low-income families.

 @iandromidas from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9GBWNDD from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

No, and I was taught in K-12 education that making babies got you suspended. End all contradictory support for baby-making. We do not need babies, period.

 @9D6QLWZ from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9S2PDWW from Virginia  answered…9mos9MO

I agree with the proposal, but it’s important to Ensure that this is not the only route parents have to go down. State should also incentivize parents to homeschool their children until the time comes for them to go to public school. And if This is a Practice that the American people wish to go down, it should be funded by the state governments, managed by the local governments, and there should be the choice of private preschools available for parents to choose

 @9FGJMKX from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should not fund any school, instead they should ban themselves from paying any teacher and abolish the teachers union so the parents can instead form a union and pay for all the school payments including kids who have disabilities or are too poor, so then everybody can get a refund plus extra so our economy can boom again.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

Teachers will never get paid enough if they don’t have any unions to stand up against the lack of payment, parents won’t do that at all, and not every parent can afford school so you just designed an education system far worse than our current one.

 @ProgressiveSeafowlLibertarian from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

Indeed, your perspective brings to light the intricate complexities of our current educational paradigm. A world where parents bear the sole financial responsibility for education might not be equitable, for not all parents possess the same financial means. The absence of a union may lead to an imbalance of power, potentially diminishing the voice of our educators. It is a delicate balance, one that requires thoughtful consideration and action. Shouldn't we strive for a system that promotes both quality education and equality of opportunity?

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

The teachers need much more of a voice than they have, but they also need to be honest about what’s happening face-to-face with parents. Parents that don’t attend meetings with teachers don’t get to complain about not being told something. We need increased funding for teachers, while holding a high standard as we currently do. They don’t get paid nearly enough, and the workload is insane, so publicly demonizing teachers is exactly how an education systems takes a turn for the worse.

We should try to teach to each students ability, while also trying to lift those strug…  Read more

 @piyo99 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8D78D3ZRepublican from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but it should be state-funded and parents should have the option to send their kids to private schools

 @9CCVG5B from Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

No, young children ought to be with their parents, and parents ought to receive aid to be able to support them with only one parent working.

 @ConstitutionPathSocialistfrom Maine  agreed…2yrs2Y

One example of this approach is the Scandinavian model, where countries like Sweden, Denmark, and Norway prioritize family-friendly policies. These nations offer generous parental leave, financial support, and flexible work arrangements to encourage parents to spend more time with their young children. This not only strengthens the bond between parents and children but also promotes a healthy work-life balance.

What are your thoughts on implementing such family-friendly policies in the United States?

 @B4Y4MYDDemocrat from Nebraska  answered…2wks2W

Pre-School seems pretty optional so if you want to put your kid in there that's up to you, You could do daycare as well. Maybe if I ever become a parent my opinion on this might change

 @B4X346T from Pennsylvania  answered…3wks3W

yes. education is a right. this should include preschool. taxpayer dollars should be helping Americans. funding preschool would be helping Americans at an early age.

 @B4QL8Q6 from Texas  answered…4wks4W

I don't think preschool is necessary, however it should be offered at no cost, especially since many parents need to work and can't afford daycare

 @B4PQ43N from North Carolina  answered…4wks4W

No, not for everyone. Some children might need structure, but pre-school is not necessary for everyone, so if they have a child who needs to go to preschool and they cannot afford it, then they should file for it, just like most everything else that the government pays for.

 @B4KLCSB from California  answered…1mo1MO

Yes increasing access to early childhood development and educational programs will prepare children for k-12 education and hopefully stop the cycle of poverty

 @B4FCJW4Republican from Georgia  answered…1mo1MO

No, for the sake of low taxes, low national debt, weak government, and capitalism. Instead, allow it to be more privatized.

 @B4D6KHP from Georgia  answered…1mo1MO

No, for the sake of low taxes, low national debt, fair pay, capitalism, federalism, weak government, and checks and balances.

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but funding should be tied to child development outcomes. States and Local governments need to match funding as well

 @B3ZYM5D from Georgia  answered…2mos2MO

No, because once again, teachers would have significant pay cuts and on top of that, the national debt would swell and taxes would spike; plus, it also undermines capitalism, weak government, federalism, and checks and balances

 @B3VGV2T  from California  answered…2mos2MO

The question of whether the federal government should fund universal preschool is complex, with arguments both for and against it. Proponents argue that it can bridge the academic gap, improve long-term outcomes, and boost economic growth, while opponents raise concerns about costs, potential negative impacts on existing programs, and the role of the federal government in education.
Arguments in Favor:
Bridging the Academic Gap:
Universal preschool can provide all children, regardless of socioeconomic background, access to high-quality early childhood education, potentially leveling the play…  Read more

 @B3SM4VLIndependent from Idaho  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, If the family needs funds to send their child to preschool they should be able to ask for the money, but it should not be just given to every person if they will not use it.

 @B3QM2V9 from California  answered…2mos2MO

The government should completely change the education system or help family's to homeschooling their kids even if that means paying them to do it!!

 @B394PQRfrom Maine  answered…3mos3MO

Yes. However, the government must ensure ALL parents/guardians have been made aware of what will be taught. Pre-school and high school should never be privatised, only higher education.

 @B35C8WLfrom Guam  answered…3mos3MO

Should u.s peeking president revolution in based and inside community's alarmed vouchers issued by new Zealand labour party leader be sure it's privacy recommend

 @B34HB8P from Massachusetts  answered…3mos3MO

Basic Education is a Universal Right and it is VITAL to the equitability and efficiency of any species/form of life.

 @B33XPRJLibertarian from Michigan  answered…3mos3MO

I believe in private education. However if people want public education (which many in the USA do) then preschool should be included

 @B2VXFPBRepublican from North Carolina  answered…3mos3MO

yes, but make it optional enrollment. if parents do not want their children in the school, they don't have to be in it.

 @Dom-Castillo  from Florida  answered…3mos3MO

No, preschool is skippable and should be an option for the parents, increasing the deficit and taxes to fund a universal preschool is not needed. However, there should be a universal curriculum across all schools nationally to ensure everybody has the same minimum education.

 @B2Q9CDP from Oregon  answered…3mos3MO

I don’t care but all children should be able to go to some sort of school regardless if it’s homeschool, online school, public or private school.

 @B2PMTB4 from Florida  answered…3mos3MO

Universal preschool could also solve the issue of child care for working parents, so yes. Making funding federal would make this benefit accessible in all states.

 @B2P3ZFS from Pennsylvania  answered…3mos3MO

No because its the parents choice what school and why they want to send their kids too. parents choose a certain program

 @B2LWG5T from Virginia  answered…3mos3MO

Pre-school curriculum should be chosen by both parent and government. Government having requirements like reading math and language while what else is taught should be ran by parents.

 @B2KSJBF from Maryland  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but roll preschool programs into public schools. If a private options wants to remain, it will not be publicly funded. Treat it exactly like K-12 schools

 @B2FZRJ4  from California  answered…4mos4MO

No, the government should offer assistance to qualifying parents with support around educating your own child in those few early years, and watching them grow instead of sending them off to preschool at approx. 3 years.

 @B2FNVYT from Illinois  answered…4mos4MO

Preschool is fundamental to socializing a child and giving them the resources to headstart their skills. If our government truly cared about it's citizens, it would give them the resources to flourish.

 @B2D6VXV from New Mexico  answered…4mos4MO

I would prefer long-term military academies in which students are taught from a young age highly useful and practical skills, knowledge, and receive proper physical fitness standards. Separation from the parents is the only way to eliminate the strange environmental factor that results in delinquency.

 @B2BHSVR from Oregon  answered…4mos4MO

I think it doesn't matter if they're being taught or watched as long as it's paid for. If they have a free daycare option it doesn't matter.

 @B28C8BQ from Massachusetts  answered…4mos4MO

I think the government should instead opt. for the circulation of books and materials to families who may not be able to afford, accommodate, or agree with the stances of a preschool for any plethora of reasons. This way the child can still be exposed to the material and their family can also hopefully still be able to attend work, take care of themselves and loved ones, and fulfill their other responsibilities.

 @B25SWG5 from Illinois  answered…5mos5MO

Education system, such as preschool are important for two parents to work and have children. These are probably the most important institutions and should be taking very seriously.

 @B24N7CL from Washington  answered…5mos5MO

The government should work to bring down the cost of Preschool, and be open to subsidizing it in it's current form/model, but I do not think the government should pay for it entirely unless they want to make preschool part of the public school system.

 @MJStevens94Republican  from Texas  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, as long as it is only a state policy and both the state (who ideally should primarily fund this) and federal governments are funding it, as well as parents, can have the option to send their child to private school, homeschool, vocational school, etc.

 @MJStevens94Republican  from Texas  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, as long as it is only a state policy and both the state (ideally primarily) and federal governments are funding it, as well as parents can have the option to send their child to private school, homeschool, vocational school, etc.

 @MJStevens94Republican  from Texas  answered…5mos5MO

If states implement such a policy for their educational system, then I think the state and federal governments should help fund it.

 @9YFDQ45No Labels from Iowa  answered…6mos6MO

They should help supplement the cost, hit like they give money to public schools for students who are enrolled.

 @9YF9JLX from Florida  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but funding should come from state instead of the federal government and as long as parents also have the option to send their child to private school.

 @9Y78S4L from South Carolina  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only if parents can prove they are working/have a steady job that would require childcare and or schooling.

 @9Y4ZVPYIndependent from Maryland  answered…6mos6MO

No, but mothers should be offered incentives or opportunities to be home with their preschool aged and younger children.

 @9XHXJMK from North Carolina  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but the Education System needs to be replaced to encourage geniuses instead of smothering them.

 @9XF8X2S from Virginia  answered…6mos6MO

They're like 4 years old when you go to preschool, they're not gonna remember anything and we could spend money elsewhere.

 @9XD8QZTDemocrat from New Jersey  answered…6mos6MO

As an educator, Universal Preschool is not as important as educating parents on how to be good parents and role models for the importance of education.

 @9X6FQRCGreen from Pennsylvania  answered…6mos6MO

No, fund a universal tax credit to offset the loss of income to a parent for childcare or preschool.

 @9X5F7XZ from New Hampshire  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but I don't think it should be a requirement for parents to send their kids to pre-K if they choose not to.

 @9WZ95PT from Georgia  answered…7mos7MO

It'd be mostly recommended that this should be spoken about not just by the government but board of education and if so need to talk to parents about this and ask for consent etc

 @9WXBK2YIndependent from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

No, if we lower the cost of living. More parents can stay home with their children longer, which is what we need to rebuild family units.

 @9WX25ZD  from Nevada  answered…7mos7MO

As long as this doesn’t apply to illegal immigrants. It’s a waste of money we need for citizens. This should be offered for everyone, not just low income.

 @9WQJGY2No Labels  from Utah  answered…7mos7MO

Preschool should be available to all, but not required. Funding for private preschools should be an option.

 @9WPMBNW from Alabama  answered…7mos7MO

it should depend on the parents choice whether they want to sent their child to school that early in life

 @9WNGDZ5 from New York  answered…7mos7MO

No, is too costly for the government and wouldn’t be efficient (not enough preschools). Should be handled or funded at state and local level via religious organizations, private companies/corporations (profit or non-profit), charter preschools, or state-run (or privately-run) voucher systems.

 @9WN7RWX from Connecticut  answered…7mos7MO

governments should fund public preschools that give an equal chance for all students to attend despite economic status, however the option to attend this school should be left up to the families.

 @9WMSW5M from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

If preschool were to provide a genuine educational environment, I would definitely want it to be publicly funded.

 @9WKZYNL from Texas  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but it should be capped at a certain amount. Allowing access for all kids, but the potentially for parents to pay more for certain schools.

 @9WK8J5L from Maryland  answered…7mos7MO

No, the government should increase the minimum wage to be a living wage and obviate the need for both parents to work in most cases

 @9WK5W3V from Wisconsin  answered…7mos7MO

No, because public preschool can be used by anyone, meaning that all families have equal opportunity.

 @9WJMPKZ from Ohio  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but it should only be funded for low-income families; those who have the money to pay for it should.

 @9WF84HS from Kansas  answered…7mos7MO

No, but there should be more funding provided to schools to allow low income children ages 3-5 to attend full time pre-school if both parents are working.

 @9WF3LKW from Colorado  answered…7mos7MO

Preschool is not an integral part of a childs development, and very academically successful kids can come from preschool.

 @9W8K53H from Washington  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, as long as the parents still have the option of whether or not to send their kids to preschool.

 @9W84LP9No Labelsfrom Guam  answered…7mos7MO

Instead of paying off student debt, the government should be providing a better, more equitable level of basic & high school education

 @9W64SZ8Republican from North Carolina  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but it should be a place where kids can get ahead of their learning and should be focused on the kids and their education.

 @9W55CQ6 from Kansas  answered…7mos7MO

No, the federal government doesn't have enough money to fund this. Stop spending so much on the military, and these allowances of paid for universal colleges will be available.

 @9VXPP87 from Arkansas  answered…7mos7MO

make the preschoolers work until they cant physically do it anymore cause they got it real easy out there fr fr

 @9VXNSW6Democrat from South Carolina  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, especially if they intend to prohibit abortion measures. Make parenthood more practical for first time parents.

 @9VVNCN8 from Montana  answered…7mos7MO

The federal government should subsidize pay for childcare workers, not through tax credits to parents.

 @9VSSL42 from Indiana  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but attendance should not be mandatory, and funding should be on the basis of the number of students enrolled, and the cost of running the facilities and paying the staff.

 @9VRDKZV from Iowa  answered…7mos7MO

yes, but they should be play based pre-schools and there should be more diversity in the types of preschools available

 @9VPMR9G from Iowa  answered…7mos7MO

Yes. This is the most vulnerable time for the child, and most likely the mother. A new child adds even more stress on a low income family. The long term benefits just have to outweigh the short term cost. Especially if we reallocate current unneeded spending to fund it.

 @9VPC2XY from Pennsylvania  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, it's hard to pay for preschool and keep a job that covers the cost or works around preschool hours.

 @9VNBHJT from Florida  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but the bulk of funds should go to helping families become stable during the first several years of a child's life so they can build the foundation for a child's academic success.

 @9VHQVSD from Massachusetts  answered…7mos7MO

I believe if someone really can't afford schooling for their children the government should provide help, but not pay for everyone's schooling.

 @9VDLS9T from Texas  answered…7mos7MO

I think preschool could be helpful but I also think kids need to learn through play and socialization until a certain age. I think we make kids grow up too fast as it is and making them go to 'normal' school even earlier would not help this.

 @9V7VL2Y  from Ohio  answered…7mos7MO

Please subsidize childcare first, then make preschool 2 years age 3 &. 4-whilst funding childcare the rest of the day so parents can afford to work.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...