Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

38.1k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

No

 @9FNTCQZ from Nevada  disagreed…2yrs2Y

My best counter argument of the Mandatory minimum prison sentence is because some people deserve to be in prison. In my opinion, it tells me if you made it to jail for let alone prison you have done something bad in order to get there.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

Yes

 @9FP5C6JDemocrat from Florida  disagreed…2yrs2Y

We should give community service, require mental health services, and provided reform instead of resorting to prisons.

 @9F86MXC from Alabama  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Drug users are victims of a myriad of different circumstances, and further punishing them for addictions is immoral

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

Yes, but only for drug dealers, not users

 @9ZNKXPC from Pennsylvania  disagreed…8mos8MO

Drug dealers are likely impoverished individuals trying to survive in their area. They are often mirroring entrepreneurs. If we invested in these individuals rather that vilify and use them for modern slavery in private prisons than we would have a better society. That is why mandatory minimum prison sentences are ineffective in my opinion. Punishment for survival is not a crime.

Some dealers are criminals, this can be taken on a case by case basis, but this is not overall how the sentiment of our system should be toward drugs in our society.

 @8PPBWMZ from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8PJJPVKDemocrat from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only for drug dealers and for users there should be a mandatory rehab sentence.

 @8PKWJB2 from Texas  commented…5yrs5Y

 @9D9TN4F from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, unless a violent crime is committed, and if so, punitive measures should be related to the violent crime and not drug possession

 @9DZSN4Z from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, users should be put into some kind of institution specifically for them, and for dealers it should depend on the drug

 @LegislationCheeseSocialist from Massachusetts  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I understand your point about users needing help rather than punishment, and differentiating between dealers based on the drug. However, it's crucial to remember that creating separate institutions for users can potentially stigmatize them further, rather than helping them reintegrate into society. For instance, Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001 and instead of imprisonment, they focused on treating drug use as a public health issue. This led to significant reductions in problematic drug use, HIV and Hepatitis infection rates, overdose deaths, drug-related crime and incarceration rates.

Do you think such a model could work in other countries or do you believe there are unique cultural or societal factors that might affect its success?

 @8GP94TLIndependent from Utah  answered…5yrs5Y

I think less prison time for offenses like this and maximum for rapists , pedophiles , child abusers , etc

 @8XQT4ZN from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

All drugs should be legal so this is irrelevant

 @9XH53CN  from Texas  commented…8mos8MO

I'm curious about your stance on this. I agree that helpful drugs like cannabis and psychedelics should be legal, but not for drugs like cocaine, heroin, or fentanyl. High death-rate drugs should not be legal.

 @8HB997P from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

No, most drugs should be legalized and the population left to sort itself out. Jail should only be used for people infringing on OTHERS' rights.

 @B2658Z7 from Texas  answered…7mos7MO

No, decriminalize all drugs and immediately release anyone currently serving time solely for drug offenses

 @9GRD5X7Democrat from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No, We should give community service, require mental health services, and provide reform instead of resorting to prisons.

 @9DXJFQP from New Hampshire  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9RJGQ4F from Tennessee  answered…12mos12MO

Yes, but only for users/dealers of Schedule 1 drug (provided that marijuana is reclassified to a Schedule 2 or lower drug).

 @9DMXBB9 from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8X54X5C from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Decriminalize drugs and institute programs to rehabilitate drug addicts instead of punishing them

 @8X4Q25LPeace and Freedom from North Carolina  agreed…4yrs4Y

Yes

I completely agree, in terms of dealers I believe that weed dealers shouldn't get arrested as marijuana has been proven to be an effective medical treatment and not that harmful.

 @8KRBRKBConstitution from Indiana  answered…5yrs5Y

There one thing i know and thats that drug use won't stop. dare has apsoluty no efect on drug use otherwise there a chance that it went up. the people who made this study was bullyed into lying about it. realy what we should do is put drug care spot so they can get drugged with medical care to help with overdoses. that way better then putting people to jail for an adiction. that like being arested because of having the flu. so the answer is no they should make drug spots so they won't die.

 @B5P3FXW from Missouri  answered…1mo1MO

Only for certain substances, marijuana should be legal and all other should remain illegal and prosecuted

 @9D6D9G9 from Tennessee  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8GQSF75 from Utah  answered…5yrs5Y

It depends on what type of drug it is, if they are a drug dealer, if they are selling it to kids and harming others, etc.

 @8XB4BPR from Utah  answered…4yrs4Y

The focus for drug use and possession should have a larger focus on rehabilitation for drug use/abuse as opposed to criminalizing the users at all. The decriminalization of hard drugs and funding research into rehabilitation would allow more people to seek out help and rehabilitation instead of facing criminal charges for something that is out of their control. TL;DR: Decriminalize hard drugs and put funding into rehabilitation so more people can confidently seek out help.

 @8GPCR7T from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

 @B36LYRDNo Labels from Florida  answered…5mos5MO

I think depending on what the case is if they were selling or using it definitely no but they if they had because someone was making them, or they were protecting someone by finding it then I think there sentences should be minimum

 @B2FJ2N2No Labels from South Carolina  answered…6mos6MO

To an extent based on mental capabilities and behavior projected by convicted felons in their medical history.

 @9X59L57 from Ohio  answered…8mos8MO

It's not about me more people need to stay pro-me less pro-life or pro-chose it's not about you so it's not your opinion or fact it just happens

 @9WZD76GRepublican from New York  answered…8mos8MO

It depends on the drug found in possession, quantity of drug and intent of use with the drug along with if the user/dealer has dependents such as young children

 @9HDZY55 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

depends on the drug and the amount. Weed possession and usage should NOT be an state/federal offense anymore unless caught having a DUI

 @9F8QS8H from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F4BTS6 from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

 @DiegoRoldan from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DRHX76  from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, because drug use is an issue of mental health; the exception is drug use while operating vehicles or other dangerous equipment

 @9DCVQDGDemocrat  from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D7RQVKConstitution from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9STNQFM from Ohio  answered…10mos10MO

I think that rehabilitation is the way to go, not prison sentences for both users and dealers, the root of the problem must be addressed.

 @9HKRSQP  from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for drug users, not dealers. Someone using drugs needs mental help and should be treated with help versus people who are killing others by dealing drugs.

 @B2ZDV3ZIndependent from California  answered…5mos5MO

No, Because pharmacies do this legally and give out meds that keep you contained not to boast your overall health, some individuals must past to keep the medical business going.

  @Joseph-Biden  from California  commented…5mos5MO

 @9F9J3SP from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

It should depend on what kind of drugs you have like if you have like HARD drugs then your sentence should be longer than with people with like week and other things like that.

 @9D4XNST from Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but depending on the kinda drugs involved. Weed? No. But more hardcore and crime related drugs like Eustasy, Coke, and Heroine? Yes. And drug dealers, no matter what kind of drug they dealing, Yes.

 @9D4R3SKDemocrat from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No but it wholly depends on the severity of the drug, such as the harder substances. Dealers of these hard drugs must be tried and executed.

 @9D4PRPY from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

No, and abolish all crimes pertaining to the purchase or sale of drugs by adults to adults, along with with DEA. The only drug offenses punishable should be use of a motor vehicle while impaired, sale of drugs to children, and drugging someone without their knowledge or consent.

 @99MFTPG from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8LJH638Progressive from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9D4Y7JBRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No. The legislatures should be providing a range of sentences and judges should be giving the leeway to make the hard choices of giving a proper sentence for the situation. If certain judges are either overly light or strict with their sentencing, then their assignments should be adjusted or they should lose their position. Being a judge is not meant to be easy.

 @8GRVGKGRepublican from Alabama  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but the sentence needs to be fair, the sentence should be based on the drug they were charged on

 @8H33Z36  from Indiana  commented…5yrs5Y

Only if they are dealing the drugs. Less jail time for those possessing drugs = fewer single-parent households = less drug possession.

 @8KQF7VXLibertarian from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8KQ78HB from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @Claycast from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KPZC5BProgressivefrom Guam  answered…5yrs5Y

War on drugs is a failure just like prohibition was a failure we gone this route twice with disastrus effects.

 @8HFKB26 from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

Depending on what drug it was such as like marijuana compared to a drug that could really kill someone like Fentanyl.

 @8QMNTPZRepublican from Nevada  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KBYFLRIndependent from Oklahoma  commented…5yrs5Y

 @8RCSC3X from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @983X3L8 from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8G5NX5H from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8G3XHGF from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8QDR65Lfrom Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

No, non-violent users of lethal street drugs should be sentenced to mandatory admission at a rehabilitation center with completion of the rehab recovery program(s)

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...