Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

It is a violation of fundamental human freedoms.
It is impossible to give informed consent if the procedure is mandatory.

People should not have to be forced into a vaccine that they do not want. No one truly knows if they even work fully or would help if a person fell sick.

Every disease can be deadly and contagious due to different factors like age, health, and exposure,.

If they show symptoms for a deadly disease they should stay quarantined and safe away from others, but violating a person's body is no way to go about keeping people safe.

It limits the freedom of choice and people should be able to make their own decisions and they should be able to make their own informed decision

Deadly contagious diseases are more dangerous than 1000 years ago because of transmission and ease of spread across globe because of transportation technology

A person should be able to do whatever they want with their body and if they refuse then they should not have to get vaccinated.

What is deadly? Who is making the distinction? How are we inviting people to understand the serious or unserious nature of the disease? Are we having an entire add campaign by phizer and the usg again? because if that's the case, then nothing you try to implement will work.

now, do we want to literally wall off the content wall and put together a steve like jobs presentation with rigorous debate, grace, and enthusiasm? with a plan for everyone? now we are talking

Due to the First Amendment, people have the right to act within their own interest, so having mandatory vaccinations would suppress those interests and therefore, being unconstitutional.

A deadly contagious disease has the ability to impact a very young child to the same degree a very minuscule disease such as a cold or the flu does at such an age.

even if the disease is deadly, the vaccination, especially if produced recently and quickly, could have worse long term effects than the sickness itself.

If you don't want the vaccine because you feel it unsafe or you just don't want it then it is your choice if you could potentially get the contagious diseases.

I think that this is a good answer but you can not fully mandate vaccines because some people are religious and dont believe in it but should have to have it in order to go into public and state schools but if they send their children to aschool with equally religious people it can be more acceptable.

For deadly diseases the right precautions should be followed wether that's the need of a vaccination or not.

i dont have an argument on the subject, if its a deadly diseases and we can prevent it from spreading.

Like as stated above, the parents should have the say. If they believe they want their kid to be so called protected then go for it.

I don't have a counter argument. I think that if it can seriously harm other students than it should be taken care of. But if its something less severe and even if it is and can't get other kids because they have a vaccine than that should be fine

No because some "deadly contagious diseases" aren't really diseases they are regular sickness but they are set up as a trap

Yet again, a person should be able to decide that they don't want to have a vaccinations, that is new or relatively untested, introduced into their body.

Diseases like the black plague back in the day, I would understand, but they made it through the years without a vaccine and did just fine.