Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

26k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

Yes

 @98CWLY9 from North Carolina  commented…2yrs2Y

They are still humans with valid opinions

 @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…1mo1MO

They're gonna vote for whoever is the most lenient on crimes, they're gonna vote for the anarchist.

 @9RRFDYZ from Ohio  agreed…9mos9MO

I totally agree. They are still human and still have a right to have an opinion. They are still citizens of the United States, and should be able to have the right to vote just like any other citizen.

 @9F58Z4ZAmerican Solidarity from California  commented…2yrs2Y

If someone is convicted of a “hate crime” for expressing an honest opinion (and it looks a though the country is heading in that direction), then that person should be allowed to vote to decriminalize hate crimes.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  commented…2yrs2Y

You understand that "honest opinions" can still be inciting hatred and/or violence, right?

Secondly, yea, all criminals should be allowed the same rights to vote as any other citizen.

 @R3ferendumTunaRepublican from Iowa  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While I understand your viewpoint, it's important to remember that voting is both a right and a privilege. It's a way to participate in our democratic process, and as such, it should be handled responsibly. Consider this, should someone convicted of election fraud, a crime that directly undermines the voting process, still have the right to participate in that process? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I completely disagree with the notion that voting should be considered a "privilege" in any nation that is meant to be a democracy. Unless all members of a nation are guaranteed their share of an equal vote or decision-making say, then that system is fundamentally NOT democratic. Any system that denies the right to vote to it's own citizens is anti-democratic, not to mention the basic fact that any nation that can deny voting rights to prisoners will have a vested interest in imprisoning those that disagree with the desires of the ruling class.

Elections should be guaranteed to all, and be made more easily accessible and safe. We shouldn't deny the right to vote for any citizen for any reason, especially not as punishment.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

No

 @9GMBVD7 from Virginia  agreed…2yrs2Y

Criminals who have done a terrible crime like murder, rape, or pedophilia, etc. They shouldn't be able to vote unless they have been positively cleared and okay to be let out and that they have been to someone like therapy to get help. And after all that maybe they can vote.

 @9FMHF6S from Virginia  disagreed…2yrs2Y

In this country we value liberty, and that all people are created equal. These people, though in prison, are still citizens of the United States, and still must be afforded the civil liberty of being allowed to take part in their nation's politics, and have their say.

 @9S9QP5JLibertarian  from North Carolina  disagreed…9mos9MO

All people are redeemable and should have rights restored after they pay restitution. No voting only while incarcerated.

 @9FMG9QWDemocrat from Missouri  agreed…2yrs2Y

Do you want someone who murdered another human being because they wanted to voting for someone who will be running our country?

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

 @9FMG9QWDemocrat from Missouri  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Once a criminal, always a criminal. And people who are criminals shouldn't be allowed to have a say in who gets to run our country. Because they clearly don't have a very good sense of judgement or common sense.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

 @9GKZF7B disagreed…2yrs2Y

Top Disagreement

i think rather they can vote or not is based on how harsh of a crime they do and even if a its a minor crime i think if they have multiple charges ban them from voting for a sum of time

 @9GTWWW3Justice party member from Virginia  agreed…1yr1Y

i think rather they can vote or not is based on how harsh of a crime they do and even if a its a minor crime i think if they have multiple charges ban them from voting for a sum of time

 @9GMG954Republican from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

i do not think they should have the right to vote no matter how harsh the crime is. if they broke laws made in american grounds, then they should not have the right to vote for someone who will be running our country, county, and state. it's not fair that criminals that don't care about laws should have the right to vote

 @9GMGC5Y from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Well, I think if the criminal did his/her time and has proven to be a good person, they should be allowed to vote.

 @9GNQWMP from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Disfranchisement may be accomplished explicitly by law or implicitly through requirements applied in a discriminatory fashion, through intimidation, or by placing unreasonable requirements on voters for registration or voting

 @9RLVFS5 from Michigan  agreed…10mos10MO

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

The possibility of disfranchisement is exactly why the right to vote should be part of the bill of rights. Inalienable. Whether or not you like the idea of someone like a pedophile voting, reason will prevail, that is called freedom of speech. There is no world in which you can grant the government the power to take away a person's voting rights without creating the risk and opportunity for the government to abuse that power.

 @9FRQRH7Republican from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

no once a criminals is convicted they should never be allowed to vote . Becasue they are a criminal for life that did somthing wrong in this country.

 @9GP565FPeace and Freedom from Wisconsin  disagreed…2yrs2Y

No, because there should still be a limit on what people can do, if the crime is worse than there should be less the person can do.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

Yes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

 @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  agreed…1mo1MO

Violence should automatically strip away someone's voting rights, at least for a large amount of time. If a violent criminal could vote, the only thing they'd look for is the candiate's leniency on criminals (meaning they'll probably vote democratic, since most Republicans support the death penalty), as they themselves are a criminal. Also not being able to vote is a valid punishment for violence and lawless behaviour.

 @59CBZLKfrom California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote. Felons should be the first to vote as they have a right not to be subject to cruel and unusual punishment. This is also a way to show felons that society has not given up on them. We should try and rehabilitate felons rather than solely incarcerate and punish them.

 @MyraMedchan from Michigan  disagreed…3yrs3Y

When I think of felons I think of hard core sociopaths who would play the system if it meant they could go back and do terrible things again. I wouldn’t expect them to vote responsibly just as I wouldn't expect a person with alsheimers or dementia to vote responsiblly.. not all 'criminals' fall into this category and I agree that rehabilitation would be preferable to incarceration. but some may be so far gone from humanity that rehabilitation may not be viable. And

 @9RLVFS5 from Michigan  disagreed…10mos10MO

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

How different would your opinion be if this discussion was not about voting rights, but a right to free speech? If you disagree with somebody's opinion, should the government be given the power to silence it? The first amendment protects all citizens from an abuse of power by the government, and voting should be considered part of free speech.

Maybe some citizens are too senile to make an informed decision when voting, but what entity could ever decide who is *too* senile in all fairness without the possibility of abusing that power? Maybe some criminals do not care about what's bett…  Read more

 @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…1mo1MO

Free speech means they can express their opinions. Voting is a privilege that someone can easily get if they aren't a criminal. A criminal can still express their opinions, they just can't take part in government. If they can convince others to agree with them, then that's fine.

 @8T4WYSK from Oregon  commented…4yrs4Y

Most Felons actually do have the right to vote after they get out of prison/jail.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

How would it make you feel to lose your right to vote because of a past mistake, even after you’ve served your punishment?

 @9WY9N5T from Ohio  answered…6mos6MO

 @9TNNZ9S from Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

I would be pissed if it was over a parking ticket. but wouldnt be madd if it was cause of murder

 @9TNNDFQ from Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

 @9YFGHFZ from Alaska  answered…6mos6MO

I would feel less than. If I have served my time and returned to society why should my vote be stripped as if I don't exist at all?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Should the severity or type of crime dictate whether a person loses their right to vote permanently?

 @9H9J4P9 from Kansas  answered…1yr1Y

In a democracy those convicted of a criminal conviction should have the right to vote as long as they are not currently serving a sentance

 @9H9J6LGIndependent from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

 @9H8DDSS from California  answered…1yr1Y

no. they could become better people or be changed so it shouldnt matter but maybe a mental evaluation might be necessary.

 @9H9JCLQDemocrat from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Yes. The type of crime determines the type of person the offender is which helps decide if they should vote or not.

 @8ZSLL8Z from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

 @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…1mo1MO

It should be testing their literacy and mental competence, not necessarily their understanding of politics. If they are literate and mentally competent enough, they should still be good enough to take part in government, even if they might not be the most informed in politics.

 @4STBS9Gfrom California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, because there is nothing that a felon could vote on that would hurt the well-being of everyone else. Also, I think that the last thing felons think about while committing a crime is their distain from not being able to vote any more.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

If trust can be rebuilt in personal relationships, should society consider allowing rehabilitated individuals the chance to vote again?

 @9H8DY47 from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes. If people truly become rehabilitated and are contributing to society, they should be granted the right to vote.

 @9H8DDSS from California  answered…1yr1Y

of course! having a history doesnt make them any less capable of having their own voting rights. they should know that they have a choice in what happens to them. people who are experiencing jail should have a say in what happens in it.

 @9H8F35J from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

No. While certain felons deserve a chance to vote again, the complicated process of setting up a system by which they can apply to regain their voting rights is not worth the effort, funding, and potential for corruption that would necessarily be involved.

 @9RG7R9K from Colorado  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, especially since “criminality” is a racially inequitable social construct of the European Settler descendants that call themselves “American”.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Do you feel our democracy is strengthened or weakened when certain groups are excluded from voting?

 @9H8H5D4 from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

It’s complicated however after a criminal serves the time for their punishment and start paying taxes I think they should be given back their right to vote. As the saying goes “No taxation without representation”

 @9H8H735Republican from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

I think people in jail or prision should not have the right to vote.Because they could just be playing a joke or high. Yes they are still a citizen but they make poor choices.

 @9H97BQW from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

I believe that democracy is weakened when certain groups are excluded from voting. This is because voting is an intrinsic right that all people have the right to d.

 @9H8H6J2Democrat from New York  answered…1yr1Y

I think that they have strengthen because people have started to know who to vote

 @9G78NC5 from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No this is protected by the fifth amendment as the right to life, liberty, and property without due process

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Can someone truly reintegrate into society if they are continuously denied certain rights, like voting?

 @9H8J5ZJ from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

It depends on the nature of the crime they commited, how long ago, and of they are a repeat offender.

 @97TLQ76Democrat from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How would you feel if you were not allowed to vote because of a mistake you made in your past?

 @9H8F9M8 from Illinois  answered…1yr1Y

I would be very upset but you chose your own path in life and it’s no one fault but yours

 @9H8F6CZ from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

I believe criminals should be allowed to vote after a certain amount of time. They are still part of the country.

 @9H98ZTY from Arkansas  commented…1yr1Y

 @8N3VQXNRepublican from Alabama  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes because they are still people, my Dad was in prison for getting two people killed in a car accident after drinking. He amazingly survived and was sent to prison for 7 years because he did community service. He had an accident because he was young and dumb and managed to accidentally take the lives of 2 people. That doesn't make him a monster, why would you take someones natural right to vote away over an accident. Drunken driving is no joke but it's not like he would have done it with his own bare hands. Now other crimes have similar to results to this, most that were too extreme wouldn't matter because of the life sentences that were given to the murderers and such. It's very controversial and i'm not even truly sure but I do know that not all convicts are bad.

 @98HKVLPDemocrat from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

What impact might voting have on the rehabilitation of those who have served their time?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How does it reflect on a society when a person who has served their penalty is still restricted from voting?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

In what ways do you think the inclusion or exclusion of convicted felons in voting affects your community?

 @9H997CXProgressive from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

I feel that many criminals align with Republican views, so the polls would be more biased

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Can denying the vote to those who have committed crimes be seen as a secondary punishment, and is it a fair one?

 @9H8MGKM from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, If you commit a violent crime you should not be allowed to vote. Except for assault.

 @9D62MN8 from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if a convict can run for president, they should also be allowed to vote

 @98FCK8Y from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @daemonkityfrom New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, every US citizen should have the right to vote regardless of their circumstances. One person = one vote.

 @B2JRMDK from Alabama  answered…4mos4MO

You lose your voting rights and most rights when you enter prison.

After you leave the prison after completing your sentence or via parole or probation, then you can have the right to vote back.

But then again, actions have consequences, such as losing some rights.

 @9VDHHVK from Virginia  answered…7mos7MO

People who are convicted of violent crimes who had actual reason to commit those crimes should be alowd to vote. people convicted and found guilty of rape and hate crimes should not be.

 @9SXF8NHDemocrat from Arizona  answered…8mos8MO

The crime convicted criminals have committed should dictate their right to vote, or not. The judge/jury on the case could also have an input on their future voting rights and it could be decided in trial.

 @9PYBLRB from California  answered…10mos10MO

If a convicted felon can run for president then a convicted felon should be able to vote for the president.

 @9LTTMNW from Wisconsin  answered…1yr1Y

criminals should be allowed to vote 15 - 20 years after their latest criminal sentence has been served

 @9G67MJ5 from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

The pros and cons of the felon voting debate include arguments about the social contract, voting while in prison, and paying debts.

 @9G67QY8 from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No, this is protected by the fifth amendment as the right to life, liberty, and property without due process

 @9G3DHMG from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

No, this issue should be irrelevant. Instead, all convicted criminals should be given the death penalty.

 @9D6DZ9R from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes however dependent on what crimes they were charged; If charged for any violations of voting rights then they should be denied the right to vote.

 @GuiltyF0reignP0licyIndependent from Florida  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Consider a case where a person is convicted for a voting rights violation like voter fraud. Post-sentence, this person might have genuinely reformed and learned the value of honest participation in democratic processes. Shouldn't they have the chance to contribute to society again as a responsible citizen? What do you think about this scenario and do you believe there could be a better way to deal with such cases?

 @9FX8RGQRepublican from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on the crime. For Example, high crimes like Murder or identity theft, those criminals should lose the right to vote.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

Not many people actually commit identity theft, and let's be honest, there's no logical reason why that would mean they can't vote. It's not a method of prevention, it's just unnecesary punishment. Voting rights shouldn't be infringed at any point.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

What are your thoughts on the idea that disenfranchising voters may disproportionately affect minority communities?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

Do you think it's more beneficial for society to include or exclude people with felony convictions in the voting process?

 @9THWSYR from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

I believe that it beneficial for the society to exclude the criminals because they did something wrong and disobeyed the law

 @9THWNXY from California  answered…8mos8MO

I think depending on the crime and its circumstances convicted criminalsY should be allowed to vote.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

If someone has served their time, do you believe they should regain their full rights as a citizen, including voting?

 @9TNPKBH from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

Depends on the crime if it was a simple robbery or something I think they should but rapists shouldnt

 @9TNN9LKanswered…8mos8MO

Yes because if somebody has served their time already that means they already paid their debt to society.

 @8JCLS2D from Kansas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8X54DN9Republican from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No they lost the right to vote but if found innocent then they get the right back.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...