Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Voting for candidate:
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
No
@9FMRSM52yrs2Y
Reports, surveys, news articles, and first-hand testimony given by many Muslims talks about the amount of Muslims that are not in relation to the terrorist attacks at all.
@9G2T95NRepublican2yrs2Y
If you ban one religion, you set a precedent that you can ban all religions. This is misaligned with The First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Most immigrants come to america for better job or living oppurtunities. What if a Muslim is coming to America to leave his harsh living standards at home or if there is a war and he is a refugee.
@9FTYC65Peace and Freedom 2yrs2Y
One of the most known terrorist attacks in the country was the 9/11 attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Even though Al-Qaeda is a Muslim group, the entire Muslim population should not be cast aside and not allowed to enter the country. Anyone from any religion could be a terrorist and there have been many terrorist attacks by groups/people of other religions. Just because 9/11 is very sad yet well-known attack does not mean all Muslims are terrorists.
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
@9FPFGQ52yrs2Y
What if someone did it to you? What if the country started taking you’re race/ethnicity/religion with caution do to terrorism?
@9FV9RBD2yrs2Y
Just because someone is Muslim, it doesn't mean that they're a terrorist. This has probably become so common since 9/11.
@9FRHCCC2yrs2Y
If their religion is a danger to people living in the US or will intentionally harm anything within the US it should be shut down
@9G4PV5D2yrs2Y
Their religion is ok, unless it is maliciously used against people in which they should be deported or put in prison.
@9CJ6CB62yrs2Y
I see no deportation attempts for Proud Boys or Evangelicals, so I don’t really think this rule is being applied as much for the sake of religious extremism as it is for MUSLIM extremism.”
That's an interesting point regarding the selective application of rules and how it could potentially be biased. One example that comes to mind is the differing responses to domestic and foreign threats. Take the Oklahoma City bombing, committed by an American citizen with extremist views. The response to that tragedy didn't involve a broad ban on a specific demographic. Do you think this is a fair comparison to make? If so, how do you think we could ensure more equal treatment across the board?
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
Yes
@9G2T95NRepublican2yrs2Y
We should not ban all Muslims from entering the United States of America. This policy is discriminatory in nature, and banning individuals from entering the United States based on their religion is religious discrimination.
@9G4PV5D2yrs2Y
If someone is in need to live in our country they can, however they can not come in with a terroristic mindset, they shall be as harmless as all our citizens and know their roll, or be out of it because they couldn't stay that way.
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
@9FRHCCC2yrs2Y
They like to blow people up because they pretend thier god told them to, we do not need a re-run of the twin towers
@9F6PZ3J2yrs2Y
No they should not be banned because of what group they identify as, as long as they are not harmful to people. Islam is a religion of peace, it is a certain few who catch more attention that give it a bad reputation.
@9F6PVX72yrs2Y
The screening process could be improved, but it is not weak. Some immigrants need to immigrate to America to keep themselves and their families safe, and they shouldn't be denied that opportunity.
@9FDRT6KNatural Law2yrs2Y
If we refuse the Muslim people because of their culture, religion, or the atrocities of some of their leaders we intrinsically bar freedom from them, and leave them in the clutches of the very same terrorists which have attacked our government.
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
@9FTY7MQ2yrs2Y
i think that its unfair cause they could be running away for their lives from those same high risk countries
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
@9FTYC65Peace and Freedom 2yrs2Y
The fact that people follow Islam and identify as Muslim should not forbid them from being able to enter the country. Anyone of any religion could be a terrorist so it is irrational and unfair for Muslims to be singled out and excluded.
@9FV8MQ92yrs2Y
I fully agree with this statement because signaling and banning anyone from entering the nation for the sole reason of "potential" terrorism, is a crime against humanity and the choice that comes with freedom of religion.
@9FMXSGV2yrs2Y
Terrorists are not muslims, they are not based nor are muslims. Being labeled as a muslim does not mean decrease the position of muslim immigrants
@9FMXVFK2yrs2Y
Anyone who chooses that option had better hold true to this belief when it comes to right-wing groups such as the Proud Boys, because right-wing terror is far more prevalent in this nation than Islamist terror.
@9G2T95NRepublican2yrs2Y
Terrorist attacks can be executed by any individual, from any background internationally and domestically. Because of this, banning a religion becomes a bad precedent. Folks should be banned on an individual basis.
@8D7X8VBNew Liberty5yrs5Y
No, but there should be a well -defined process to vet immigrants of all countries.
@5CNYTV95yrs5Y
Keep the country safe but make sure not to be racist.
@5CMPKVXIndependence5yrs5Y
Fact is, all terrorist attacks thus far have been from Muslims - not Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Taoists, Seventh Day Adventists, atheists, Satanists, etc. So, let's call a spade a spade and understand that radical jihadist Islamist Muslims have targeted everything and everyone not in accordance with it's stance on well, everything. Is it okay to be leery of such folk? I say, YES.
@8RB569P4yrs4Y
Apparently the January 6th Capitol riot doesn't exist.
@5CNBR395yrs5Y
Look closer to home for the terrorists SMH
@546BWHR5yrs5Y
We put Japanese and Germans in camps while at war. Are we not at war on terrorists?
@597G7JP5yrs5Y
no let only the real Muslims not the fake "Muslims" who are terrorists.
@5CWPNK35yrs5Y
From what I understand, every incoming immigrant who comes legally goes through 40 hours of interrogation and 3 background checks. How much more do we need?
@4XW9CJV5yrs5Y
Most of the "terrorism" is engineered by the CIA, Mossad, MI6 etc. The Muslims are fall guys.
@5CXGNWH5yrs5Y
There are millions of Christians who need help. Bring them in first. As a woman I am apposed to inviting cultures that think women are not equal to me. We fought too hard for our rights and those of our daughter. May sound harsh but it is creating enormous anger amounts everyday people you are not meeting. This is a very explosive issue
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, banning Muslim immigrants is islamophobic
@5498JBF5yrs5Y
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional, but strict background checks should be enacted
@546LXDP5yrs5Y
Religion should not be a factor of terrorism, however there needs to be a stricter screening process.
@9CCJ5662yrs2Y
Immigrants don't have constitutional rights.
While it's true that immigrants, especially those who are undocumented, may not have the same constitutional rights as citizens, it's important to remember that the U.S. Constitution does provide certain rights and protections to all people within its borders, regardless of their immigration status. For example, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee due process and equal protection under the law.
How do you think these constitutional protections should apply to immigrants, especially when considering national security concerns?
@9F5DTC72yrs2Y
No but ban them from being drivers
@9F5DD8V2yrs2Y
I prefer a permanent ban.
@9CFWBFWProgressive2yrs2Y
Yes, and make it a permanent ban
no, unless they are suspect or have a criminal record, and as long as a strict background check was applied
@9FQJK9P2yrs2Y
All immigration should be put on hiatus until we can sort out our nations current border crisis and unideal birth rates.
@VulcanMan6 2yrs2Y
What exactly is the issue here..?
@5CXH2XN5yrs5Y
I'm torn on this one... It's crazy to actually consider banning a whole religion and it feels icky as well... But the status quo needs to change as well... But I'm gonna say no... No ban but single men traveling back and forth should be watched more closely
@54967875yrs5Y
Let them enter the country but keep them contained. After all, they are asking for help. We can help and need not feel guilty if we restrict their movement and don't exactly provide 4 star hotel. I can see us being accused of something awful just because we need to maintain national security. That's not fair but it would happen, I'm sure. Do it anyway. It's the only human thing we can do and survive.
@4XVT3R85yrs5Y
Freedom of mobility is a human right.
@8SC99564yrs4Y
No, but we should quickly improve anti-terrorism screening processes.
@8NTMDKW5yrs5Y
No not unless they have evidence of terrorism on record
@8MCVW8KLibertarian5yrs5Y
Yes ban them. The Muslim religion is contradictory to our Constitution which primarily aligns Christian beliefs. I do not hate Muslims however their countries of origin are better suited to their belief system.
@97VFSJG2yrs2Y
No, have background checks to ensure no terrorist connections instead
Yes, no Muslim immigration period.
@99GKR3Q2yrs2Y
Yes and other religous immigrants
@9CL3V2F2yrs2Y
@9F8QS8H2yrs2Y
No, background checks for everyone. Even though immigrants have the right to the country, the addage "until proven guilty" applies.
@9F562N42yrs2Y
I don’t believe in a ban but higher screening from higher risk countries
@9DZVKDC 2yrs2Y
No, but a more effective screening process needs to be implemented quickly.
@9DS3RPL2yrs2Y
No, but if you suspect a threat, don't blame their beliefs.
@9D9LW8F2yrs2Y
no but only after a background check to make sure no connection to any radical, terrorist.
@9D85MTR 2yrs2Y
No, but screening should be adjusted for regional and cultural threats
@9D7VRVM2yrs2Y
No, but slow it down and improve the system.
@9D5WGGJ2yrs2Y
We need a major rehaul of the entire immigration system. We need to properly screen individuals before entry/citizenship is given, from any country.
No but banning immigrants from “high risk” countries effectively means many Muslim countries. Islam is proving to be mostly contrary to many Anglo-American values so this frankly a negligible loss in the long term.
@9D4PRPY2yrs2Y
Yes, unless they swear to live under the Constitution instead of sharia.
@9D4PDXN2yrs2Y
No but there does need to be a screening process.
No, but demand a written agreement letting in only those who recognize the rights of LGBT, women and other values that we share, which also concerns respect for other religions and the principle of non-imposition. Then such people can be let in.
@9G2XHRD2yrs2Y
Folks who have been frightened and living in fear of their own people, from other countries, should be able to find a safe-haven anywhere they choose to go. However, that comes with a price of having to become a citizen and then serving their new country via the military.
@9G2S989Independent2yrs2Y
Yes, unless there is solid evidence behind a person or group of persons planning or committing an act of terrorism
They shouldn't be banned from the country but there should be a place for them to go until the ability to screen improves
@9FZD78Z2yrs2Y
No. All muslims are not terrorist. We should have strong screening process to identify potential risks.
@9FZ98NV2yrs2Y
yes because mulsims and isis invaded our villages in iraq witch caused us to move and flee our homes and countries and they were trying to force people to convert to islam or die and many people died
@9FZ7ZYP2yrs2Y
No, because not everyone is the same. Just because one person did something doesn't mean someone from the same exact race will repeat that.
@9FW7PB9 2yrs2Y
not all muslims are terrorists. I feel like everyone should be investigated before entering the country
@9FW4R7JConstitution2yrs2Y
Only women and children should be allowed immigration for now till terrorism I the middle east is stopped
@9FSBSGWConstitution2yrs2Y
No, but they should be required to take several tests to demonstrate their understanding of human rights and US laws and be observed for the first year.
@9FQK4YQ2yrs2Y
All immigration, with the exception of marriage should be banned. That includes those who want to buy citizenship
@9FQHQHL2yrs2Y
No, we should focus more on the domestic terrorism we have today with white nationalists, police brutality, and domestic violence against women & men.
@9FQBMGGIndependent2yrs2Y
No, State department needs to perform due diligence to ensure low risk of visitation
@9FQ74JK2yrs2Y
No, but carefully vet all immigrants.
@Yaunti2 2yrs2Y
No, and in the name of equality, ban religion as it leads to divisive questions like this
@9FQ68XFLibertarian2yrs2Y
This is a highly contentious issue of freedom versus safety. I believe that everyone should have the freedom to have faith where they’d like, but also understand the danger of letting an influx of dangerous people (of any culture or background) into the country being a poor idea. I would suggest that bringing in families and refugees would be okay but single individuals would definitely require an increased level of screening
@9FPPV45Independent2yrs2Y
No, but they should be deeply screened
@9FPHZPQ2yrs2Y
Do a better job of vetting and keeping track
@Yaunti2 2yrs2Y
No, and in the name of equality, ban religion
@9FP3K2G2yrs2Y
No, yet the screening process should still be improved. Background checks from previous countries should also be in place.
@9FNPJ2V2yrs2Y
No, but there needs to be extreme caution with high risk countries, and severe punishment for illegal activity
@9FL8DCP2yrs2Y
No, but every immigrant from a "high risk" country should be thoroughly vetted and monitored for possible terrorist affiliations.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but we should ban all immigrants from high-risk countries.
@9FJG66S2yrs2Y
they should no be banned but they should have major screening sand background checks.
@9FJ72BK2yrs2Y
Do screening check on all who enter from "high risk" countries, whether known or unknown via high-tech systems. Then ban certain individuals.
@9FHVV77 2yrs2Y
it shouldn't only be Muslims
love the ? framing the open border garbage we have had for 2 1/2 years is off the rails stop the illegal stuff
@9FHJ5VPConstitution 2yrs2Y
It is unconstitutional to discriminate against US citizens based on religion. The vetting process should only accept those who believe in the constitution regardless of religion.
@9FGT3QWRepublican2yrs2Y
Banning someone off religion is unconstitutional but we have to be wherry of who we let into the county so every immigrant from a high risk country should be banned
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
