@ISIDEWITHQuestions社会问题11yrs ago

政府应该在钱币、联邦建筑和国家名胜古迹上取消对上帝的引用来支持政教分离吗？

1956年，国会通过了一项决议，宣布“IN GOD WE TRUST”作为美国的国家格言。艾森豪威尔总统签署法律，座右铭加入纸币在1957年开始的反对者认为，座右铭违反了美国宪法，因为它是一个明显违反教会与国家的分离。支持者认为，它不喜欢一张宗教派别另一些人。

28%
是的
72%
不
21%
是的
63%
不
5%
应该，但不应该浪费金钱去删除现有的引用
7%
不，只要不提及某一特殊宗教就行
1%
是的，这对不信神的宗教会产生偏见
3%
不应该，宗教是我们国家历史的一个重要方面

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “First Amendment” has changed over time for 7.4m America voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “First Amendment” has changed over time for 7.4m America voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “First Amendment” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4 days4D

If They Ban TikTok, Is Apple Next?

The censors who abound in Congress will likely vote to ban TikTok or force a change in ownership. It will likely soon be law. I think the Supreme Court will ultimately rule it unconstitutional, because it would violate the First Amendment rights of over 100 million Americans who use TikTok to express themselves.In addition, I believe the Court will rule that the forced sale violates the Fifth Amendment. Under the Constitution, the government cannot take your property without accusing and convicting you of a crime—in short, without due process. Since Americans are part of TikTok's ownership, they will eventually get their day in court.The Court could also conclude that naming and forcing the sale of a specific company amounts to a bill of attainder, legislation that targets a single entity.These are three significant constitutional arguments against Congress' forced sale/ban legislation. In fact, three different federal courts have already invalidated legislative and executive attempts to ban TikTok.If the damage to one company weren't enough, there is a very real danger this ham-fisted assault on TikTok may actually give the government the power to force the sale of other companies.Take, for example, Apple. As The New York Timesreported in 2021, "In response to a 2017 Chinese law, Apple agreed to move its Chinese customers' data to China and onto computers owned and run by a Chinese state-owned company."Sound familiar? The legislators who want to censor and/or ban TikTok point to this same law to argue that TikTok could (someday) be commanded to turn over American users' data to the Chinese government.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.