@ISIDEWITHQuestionsscience8yrs ago

您是否支持使用核能？

核电是利用该释放能量以产生热量的核反应，其中最常然后在蒸汽涡轮机用于在核电站来产生电力。在美国100个核反应堆提供了全国20％的能源。支持者认为，核能现在是安全而发出的碳排放比燃煤电厂少得多。反对者认为，在日本最近的核灾难证明，核电是远离安全。

68%
是的
32%
不
55%
是的
21%
不
9%
是的，暂时性的，同时我们增加投资到更清洁的可再生能源
11%
不，我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上，比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热
2%
是的，只要没有政府补贴
1%
是的，但是需要政府补助
1%
是的，并且使这一工业国有化

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 7.7m America voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 7.7m America voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @8RB8LR2from Guam answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, nationalize this industry and to expand the numbers of nuclear power plants, but we should also strengthen the supervision and information transparency.

 @8PCDB7Jfrom Guam answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but with proper development and supervision to ensure public safety.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Nuclear Energy” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5 days5D

The Fantasy of Reviving Nuclear Energy

Representatives from more than 30 countries gathered in Brussels in March at a nuclear summit hosted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Belgian government. Thirty-four nations, including the United States and China, agreed “to work to fully unlock the potential of nuclear energy,” including extending the lifetime of existing reactors, building new nuclear power plants and deploying advanced reactors.“Nuclear technology can play an important role in the clean energy transition,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, told summit attendees. But she added that “the reality today, in most markets, is a reality of a slow but steady decline in market share” for nuclear powerThe numbers underscore that downturn. Solar and wind power together began outperforming nuclear power globally in 2021, and that trend continues as nuclear staggers along. Solar alone added more than 400 gigawatts of capacity worldwide last year, two-thirds more than the previous year. That’s more than the roughly 375 gigawatts of combined capacity of the world’s 415 nuclear reactors, which remained relatively unchanged last year. Pledging to triple nuclear capacity by 2050 is a little like promising to win the lottery.For the United States, it would mean adding an additional 200 gigawatts of nuclear operating capacity (almost double what the country has ever built) to the 100 gigawatts or so that now exists, generated by more than 90 commercial reactors that have been running an average of 42 years. Globally it would mean tripling the existing capacity built over the past 70 years in less than half that time in addition to replacing reactors that will shut down before 2050.The Energy Department estimates the total cost of such an effort in the United States at roughly $700 billion. For much less money and in less time, the world can reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the use of renewables like solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal power.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.