29% 是的 |
71% 不 |
24% 是的 |
51% 不 |
3% 是，直到穆斯林极端主义分子的恐怖袭击频率降低 |
12% 不，这个决定应该基于犯罪率而不是种族或宗教 |
2% 是，并应对所有的新移民增加监控 |
7% 不，专门针对穆斯林是违宪的、种族主义和煽动性的 |
2% No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods |
See how support for each position on “Muslim Surveillance” has changed over time for 1.2m America voters.
正在载入数据......
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Muslim Surveillance” has changed over time for 1.2m America voters.
正在载入数据......
Loading chart...
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Muslim Surveillance” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH4wks4W
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled on Tuesday in favor of a Muslim man who said he had been put on the no-fly list in retaliation for refusing to become a government informant. The court rejected the government’s contention that removing the man from the list had rendered his case moot.The no-fly list, which rapidly expanded after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, appears to include tens of thousands of people. The criteria for inclusion on the list are opaque, making it subject to errors and abuse.Yonas Fikre, an American citizen, challenged his placement on the list, saying it had violated due process and amounted to discrimination based on race, national origin and religion.The legal proceedings are at an early stage, and Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, writing for the court, said it was required to assume that the following version of events, set out in the lawsuit, was true.
