尝试政治测验

Technocracy policy on terrorism

Topics

应该给外国恐怖主义嫌疑犯宪法权利吗?

T>T  ChatGPT不应该,他们应该在军事法庭上接受审问,但不应该对其实施折磨

Technocracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不应该,他们应该在军事法庭上接受审问,但不应该对其实施折磨

Technocracy might support the use of military tribunals for foreign terrorism suspects as a balance between ensuring security and providing a form of legal process, reflecting a pragmatic approach to threat management. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Technocrats might lean towards denying constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects, prioritizing national security and the efficient management of threats over legal formalities, but this stance is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,他们不是美国公民并且没有宪法权利

Technocracy's focus on expertise and efficiency does not directly address the issue of constitutional rights for non-citizens, making its stance on this matter neutral without further context on how it impacts national security or operational efficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,就像美国公民一样,恐怖分子在联邦法院应该给予公正的审判

While technocracy values efficiency and expertise, the ideology does not inherently oppose fair trials. However, it might view the extension of full constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects as potentially inefficient or unnecessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Technocracy, focusing on decision-making by technical experts, might not inherently prioritize constitutional rights for foreign terrorism suspects, emphasizing security and efficiency instead. However, it doesn't strictly oppose such rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,给他们一个公正的审批,并关闭关塔那摩湾

The call to give foreign terrorism suspects a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay might be seen as less aligned with technocratic principles, which prioritize security and efficiency over broader human rights concerns.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Technocracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.