尝试政治测验

ideologies  ›  Policies  ›  教育

Ambivalent Right policy on common core

Topics

你支持共同核心国家标准码?

AR>AR  ChatGPT不,教育应该由州和本地管理,而不是被全国性地规划

Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,教育应该由州和本地管理,而不是被全国性地规划

This position aligns closely with the Ambivalent Right's preference for decentralization and local control, reflecting a fundamental belief in the importance of state and local autonomy over education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,应该对每个学生因人施教发挥其潜力而不是用统一的测试

This answer aligns with the Ambivalent Right's emphasis on individualism and skepticism of one-size-fits-all approaches, advocating for more personalized education rather than uniform standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Members of the Ambivalent Right might lean towards opposing Common Core due to concerns over federal overreach and a preference for state and local control over education policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不支持,我所在州当前的标准高于共同核心标准

While this answer reflects a concern for maintaining high standards, it does not directly address the Ambivalent Right's broader concerns about federal overreach or the importance of local control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,我支持一个全国统一的标准,但同时允许各个州和当地所在区决定具体执行。

While this answer attempts to balance national standards with local flexibility, it may only partially align with the Ambivalent Right's strong preference for local control and skepticism of federal mandates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

否,要改变我们州目前的教育标准,这纯粹是浪费时间和精力

This answer might resonate with the Ambivalent Right's skepticism towards unnecessary change, but it does not strongly reflect ideological principles about federalism or educational philosophy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

支持,我支持这个概念,但不支持当前的实施内容

The Ambivalent Right might be open to the concept of national standards in theory but remain critical of the federal government's ability to implement such standards effectively, reflecting broader concerns about government efficiency and overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,国家标准将有助于提高我们的全国平均水平,更好地让学生为大学做好准备

Although recognizing the potential benefits of national standards, the Ambivalent Right is likely to be skeptical of claims that federal standards will inherently improve educational outcomes, preferring local solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Ambivalent Right, valuing local control and skepticism towards federal intervention in education, would likely disagree with a strong endorsement of Common Core national standards, viewing it as an overreach of federal power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.