JD Vance

同意

Yes, but only for operations within our country’s borders

This approach aligns with a strong stance on national security and border control, areas Vance is likely to prioritize. It suggests a targeted and limited use of military resources to combat drug cartels within U.S. borders, which could resonate with his views on sovereignty and law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

JD Vance, as a conservative politician, may support strong measures against drug cartels to ensure national security and combat drug trafficking. However, his support for mobilizing the U.S. military against Mexican Drug Cartels might be tempered by considerations of international law, sovereignty, and the complexities of foreign military intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, we already have agencies that address these issues

Vance might recognize the value of existing agencies like the DEA in addressing drug trafficking and cartel activities. He could agree that enhancing the capabilities and funding of these agencies might be more appropriate and effective than military mobilization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不

While Vance might prioritize strong action against drug cartels, outright disagreement with mobilizing the military could be seen as too passive for his stance on national security. However, he might prefer other methods or collaborations with Mexican authorities over direct military intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, legalize all drugs instead

Legalizing all drugs would be contrary to conservative principles and Vance's likely stance on law and order and drug policy. This approach would not align with his probable views on combating drug trafficking and ensuring public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.