@8C8LMNH

8>8  Personal answerI don't care about abortion enough to be pro-choice or pro-life, but it should be legal. Abortions will happen, legal or not, but if they are legal, they can be done in a safer manner than if they are illegal.

8>8  Personal answerYes, everyone should have the same adoption rights, regardless of sexual orientation. Only a religious organization should be exempt from following this.

8>8  Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answer"Marriage" and "civil union" should be treated identically. It can be different from a religious stance, but not from a legal stance, as I firmly believe in separation of church and state. A church should have the right to refuse any ceremony if it is against that church's beliefs, as we also have freedom of religion, but the law should not discriminate against people.

8>8  Personal answerYes, this will protect the safety and rights of police officers and citizens

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerThere should be a reasonable cap on any medication's cost, and drug patents should have a shorter lifespan

8>8  Personal answerNo, the federal government should not have this kind of power over states

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerAlthough global warming is natural, reasonable steps should be taken toward a greener future.

8>8  Personal answerYes, if it is determined that would be best for public health, but it should be a decision that is reassessed regularly until we are no longer in a pandemic

8>8  Personal answerNo, increase mental health and background checks instead

8>8  Personal answerYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

8>8  Personal answerYes, but the owner must post a sign stating their beliefs and what they refuse

8>8  Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle

8>8  Personal answerNo, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings

8>8  Personal answerYes. Nobody should be discriminated against for things that do not hurt others, and someone's personal gender identity does not hurt other people any more than their biological sex does.

8>8  Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

8>8  Personal answerReform to a flat tax

8>8  Personal answerYes, but I don't believe athletics should be split by gender/sex. If they must have separate categories, it should be based on something more neutral that is relevant to that sport, like size, similar to how boxing has weight classes.

8>8  Personal answerNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

8>8  Personal answerYes, if they were born here

8>8  Personal answerNo, universities and colleges need to provide this education to students for a lower cost than they are currently. Also, the interest rates for student loans are outrageous. We should be able to receive an education without going into such crippling debt because of it.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, but the federal government should sponsor this program instead of businesses

8>8  Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs

8>8  Personal answerI support a simplified tax code that taxes everyone equally when they spend money, and I support reduced or absent interest rates for student loans. I don't believe someone should be taxed more just because they have more.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerWar should be avoided. Until they pose and actual threat and show aggression we should strive for diplomatic solutions.

8>8  Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

8>8  Personal answerNo, but a system which allows the electorate to easily recall the member if they are not doing the will of the electorate and replace them with a new representative.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of our politicians

8>8  Personal answerIf the children are going to be interacting with the general public, yes, unless there is a medical reason not to

8>8  Personal answerNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process

8>8  Personal answerOnly in extreme cases with undeniable evidence. To me, those carrying out the death penalty are committing sanctioned murder, which is something I object to.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but never in public. It should be regulated the way alcohol is regulated, with similar laws limiting use during certain activities such as driving.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, it should be put in a museum where it was originally flown

8>8  Personal answerthis should be democratically voted on in each state and region

8>8  Personal answerLet the state and/or city vote on it and if they come positive then yes.

8>8  Personal answerYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

8>8  Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

8>8  Personal answerNo, only if they are convicted of a violent crime

8>8  Personal answerThey should learn English, but their native language should not be taken away from them

8>8  Personal answerYes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record

8>8  Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

8>8  Personal answerNo, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels

8>8  Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender

8>8  Personal answermake it harder for illegal immigration but easier for legal immigration

8>8  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

8>8  Personal answerNo, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

8>8  Personal answerNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

8>8  Personal answerHave to learn more about it.

8>8  Personal answerYes, if they pay taxes

8>8  Personal answerYes, but guarantee everyone gets ID and register citizens when they turn 18

8>8  Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech

8>8  Personal answerTrigger warnings, absolutely. Safe spaces should be limited to mental health crises or physical danger, such as a guidance counselor or nurse's office.

8>8  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

8>8  Personal answerNo, this would be too costly and ineffective

8>8  Personal answerNot educated enough on the subject matter to comment.

8>8  Personal answerI dont feel I know enough about this topic to contribute an answer.

8>8  Personal answerI don't have enough information on this topic.

8>8  Personal answerYes but require all high school students to pass in order to get their degree

8>8  Personal answerYes, but anyone 16-18 voting should be required to pass a test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote.

8>8  Personal answerYes, private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare

8>8  Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

8>8  Personal answerYes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

8>8  Personal answerNo, reduce military spending instead

8>8  Personal answerNo, I believe we should have socialized health care. We should not force people to buy health insurance, it should just be free.

8>8  Personal answerIf the person is able to work then they should be required to work

8>8  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount

8>8  Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech

8>8  Personal answerYes, if there is no chance they will survive, there is a psychological examination to show they fully understand the choice, and the medical professional is willing to assist. I have some reservations, however, as it is still a person assisting in the ending of another's life.

8>8  Personal answerWelfare should be reformed. It should be temporary only for those who need it, and those who are on it should have clear steps that they are required to take to get off of it. There are people who would not be able to get off welfare despite their best efforts, but this should be a much smaller number than it currently is.

8>8  Personal answerYes, unless that federal building/national monument is religious in nature. However, there are more pressing issues, so we should not spend money removing existing references at this time.

8>8  Personal answerYes, it is severely psychologically damaging to young undeveloped minds

8>8  Personal answerFree Healthcare.

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerNo, but it needs reformed

8>8  Personal answerNo, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for 10 years

8>8  Personal answerIt depends on the drug and circumstance

8>8  Personal answerI am uneducated on this issue.

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerI really don't understand the whole situation to give an answer.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member

8>8  Personal answerNo, their income is none of our business

8>8  Personal answerI don’t know

8>8  Personal answerI'm not informed about this topic to make a decision.

8>8  Personal answerYes, so long as the focus is on rehabilitating the addict. Drug abuse is a health issue, not a criminal one, and any health issue that can be improved with rehabilitation should be

8>8  Personal answerYes, and ban all forms of lobbying

8>8  Personal answerYes, but it should be temporary. We can't have true equality until we get everyone to the same starting point.

8>8  Personal answerYes, anyone receiving money from the government should be drug tested. If they test positive for a drug that is not prescribed, they should be provided treatment. If they refuse treatment, they should no longer receive government money.

8>8  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerThis is a complicated instance, and I'm not sure where I stand on it

8>8  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerYes but allow private companies like turbotax to maintain their systems as an alternative to the IRS.

8>8  Personal answerYes, slowly so we don't destabilize the region.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

8>8  Personal answerNo, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention

8>8  Personal answerNo, and the government is currently over-regulating private businesses

8>8  Personal answerDecrease by streamlining and making it more efficient, eliminating wasteful spending

8>8  Personal answerYes, but under strict ethical regulation

8>8  Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as they pay taxes

8>8  Personal answerNot educated enough to understand what this really is.

8>8  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

8>8  Personal answerno opinion, not enough information

8>8  Personal answerGradually phase them out.

8>8  Personal answerI don’t know

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence, as long as the crime was not committed while in office, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, and as long as they are not under investigation of a crime,

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

8>8  Personal answerNo, I do not believe in the death penalty

8>8  Personal answerIt depends on the area you live in and how readily available transportation is in that area.

8>8  Personal answerYes, unless they have committed a crime

8>8  Personal answerNo, eliminate the income cap on taxable earnings and stop spending current funds on other programs instead

8>8  Personal answerDepends on their offence

8>8  Personal answerNo opinion. Not well enough educated on the issue.

8>8  Personal answerNo, but make them pay taxes.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerno view on the matter

8>8  Personal answerIt depends on the situation. If it is an emergency situation, then yes the president should not have to authorize with congress but if there is enough time, then congress should authorize. It all depends on the circumstances at the moment in time.

8>8  Personal answerI don't care

8>8  Personal answerI am not informed enough to form a full opinion

8>8  Personal answerTaxes should not be funding privately managed institutions. Taxes are meant to cover public expenses and those of the governing body that collects said taxes.

8>8  Personal answerNo, and end for-profit college sports

8>8  Personal answerNo, we have selectively bred crops for thousands of years and labeling just adds an unfounded stigma to the science

8>8  Personal answerNo, a global free trade system is better for our businesses and consumers

8>8  Personal answerIt truthfully depends on the situation and the severity of the suspected terrorist. If the situation can be easily solved by capturing and imprisoning them, that would be preferable; but frankly, sometimes it's necessary for someone to pull the trigger. In my opinion, the assassinations should be a last resort- just see what happened with Franz Ferdinand. He was killed and the world marched to war.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, in order to stabilize our financial system, it must remain independent of Congressional oversight

8>8  Personal answerThey should be treated like humans. But have limited rights as they are not us citizens

8>8  Personal answerNo, but there should be regulations and there should be a ban on accounts/posts not explicitly tagged as Political, Bias, or Advertising. It should be clear to every user that it is an opinion/advertisement.

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported

8>8  Personal answerYes, he should be protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act

8>8  Personal answerI don’t know

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations

8>8  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to make an opinion

8>8  Personal answerI would prefer to switch to a one single flat universal tax

8>8  Personal answerI'm not entirely certain what this means.

8>8  Personal answerIt is not for a nation not involved to make this decision.

8>8  Personal answerYes, for government workers but not for politicians

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answeri really cant say have to learn a little bit more on this

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies

8>8  Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses

8>8  Personal answerNo, the federal government does not have the authority to impose state and local taxes

8>8  Personal answerNo, and it has no intrinsic value

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerIf necessary, yes.