Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Equal Pay
4>4 Personal answereve see what strippers and hookers make? Can't imagine johns paying as much for jack |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
4>4 Personal answertraining, training, training - a "well-regulated" militia does not imply free-lancers who don't know which end to point where |
Social › Gender Identity
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
4>4 Personal answerif their business is a religion 'harm none and do what thou wilt' - otherwise, don't be a dickhead |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerbigotry is ugly no matter the excuse - let's get all American better educated on all the superstitious belief systems - so we can argue away those who misuse ancient texts for their own lust for power |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Climate Change
4>4 Personal answerthe government is clueless about planetology - if they had the power they could ice age us or fry us without knowing why or how. The despoilers and exploiters will never give up their addiction to power - or humans their lust for material luxury - even if it costs the world |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
4>4 Personal answerdon't forget the 'non-traditional' families - us non-breeders are subsidizing those who produce the next generation of labor. more leave for all |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerimmediately and retroactively - release the victims of the war on drugs - and reparations for such injustice and folly - and inherent racism. |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerinvoluntary draftees are worth as much as mandatory loyalty oaths - register all for Selective Service at 18 automatically - including those incarcerated who upon reaching age 26 without registering are banned from any government benefits. Make public service something to be chosen proudly - not coerced from a free people. |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Education › Student Loans
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigration
4>4 Personal answerOh just make all Western Hemisphere nations new States of the United States of America and be done with Manifest Destiny. (Except Brazil until they adopt a coherent electric grid.) |
Social › Death Penalty
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerYes, and immediate releases of and reparations for victims of this horrible racist folly of criminalization |
Social › Government Mandates
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Confederate Flag
4>4 Personal answer700,000 died when that flag went up - if a state wants to brag about being losers and fools - and be hated by many of their citizens - what's not to allow? Must remember the history to prevent any recurrence. |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
4>4 Personal answerif you can find such an independent group - the power-mad always have ways to game the system Maybe this will shake them up for a while and give us a breather from their undemocratic schemes |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerlike China and Russia, etc. obey any restrictions we might pretend to disallow? I thought they always collected every conversation since "What Hath God Wrought?" |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerour attackers do not distinguish who they kill - training for those who can protect themselves is far better than relying on the standard of "War equals Rape" tradition. |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
4>4 Personal answertreat 'em like any other minor pickups - let the Feds do the Fed work |
Healthcare › Medicaid
4>4 Personal answerYes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system |
Immigration › Border Security
4>4 Personal answerlike a Berlin type wall? Or a Great Wall (of China) - or maybe Hadrian's Wall? Of course all earthlings would come here |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerget real - illegal is merely a Congressional whim - they could legalize them in a day if they so chose. "My" immigrants got help from Squanto in Plymouth. We should be so mean as to let humans suffer when we have plenty of resources to prevent it? |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
4>4 Personal answerimpractical - let the businesses who forgo such talent fail to their competition who promote good practice |
Elections › Voter Fraud
4>4 Personal answerthis is and always has been a blatant attempt at voter suppression - racist and undemocratic automatic registration on turning 18 - even those incarcerated under the racist re-slavery incarceration policy |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
4>4 Personal answeroh we are so hung up on "illegals" - sounds like the "N" word in consonants - code word for bigots and racists. Anyone remember how the Chinese were treated in 19th century? Or Irish. This is a dang small planet - get over this us vs. them disease. |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
4>4 Personal answerI dare not oppose any law that questions Patriotism. Whatever the Alphas decide, us Wobblies must follow - or be conspired to 'elements' |
the Economy › Government Spending
4>4 Personal answerUS been in debt since the American Revolution (except when they sold off the Native's lands to European progeny) cuts in public spending is yet another racist tactic to hurt the oppressed and vulnerable. |
Foreign Policy › Israel
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
4>4 Personal answerAll earth should learn Americanish - just like Pupinia Stewart demands - or maybe us English elites ought to learn Navaho - or as Tom Learher put it: Chinese |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
4>4 Personal answerhuh ? ya' get what ya' pay for - petabyte access for everyone - and why are (insanely cheap) cell/mobile phone services allowed to charge hundreds of dollars a month for what costs them pennies to provide. The game is rigged. And trying to fiddle it is a fool's errand. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
4>4 Personal answerlet juries decide whether such violence would be possible without these profiteers of folly |
Social › First Amendment
4>4 Personal answersave our money - if God objects, let him/her push their own agenda - shouldn't need our tax money for supersitition |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
4>4 Personal answerprovide private cells for each - and monitored public areas - to eliminate the policy of automatic rape of vulnerable juveniles (and adults) in our prisons. Shameful we allow this abuse to continue. |
Social › Euthanasia
4>4 Personal answerought to know how to do it without help - but if too ill to handle it, "harm none and do what thou wilt" |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerIncrease as much as we need the talent. Compete if you can. If not, stop Congress from playing stupid games. |
the Economy › Labor Unions
4>4 Personal answerHelp |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
4>4 Personal answerwhy should the gov get a cut for what they did nothing to produce - except maybe build the roads that made real estate have value. as long as they are extorting everyone, they should get a cut of this game too. |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
4>4 Personal answermore educated from all classes are better (and cheaper) than ignorance come on - illegal is just another bigotry |
Education › Common Core
4>4 Personal answerIt's a start - but without addressing the root causes of poor education - poverty and racism - it's little more than feel-good. |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Obamacare
4>4 Personal answerYes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for public projects and never for private projects |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
4>4 Personal answernot unless we mean to completely win - remove the evil regime and provide for the cruelly oppressed people of (the former) North Korea - reunify the nation. Do not do piecemeal. |
Foreign Policy › Torture
4>4 Personal answerNo for all those last three reasons - exception for Dick Cheney maybe for an example. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerIncrease |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
4>4 Personal answeronly if we mean to win - convincingly and quickly - destroy their bogus interpretation of medieval mentality/dogma |
Foreign Policy › Drones
4>4 Personal answercollect all intelligence - kill only with due process and only if necessary to prevent imminent slaughter - no 'free-kill' zones |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
4>4 Personal answerNo, for both disadvantage low income vs wealthier - and stop raiding my trust fund for other (pointless wars...) programs |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
4>4 Personal answerour due process needs to lead the world in the right way to govern. Indefinite detention only makes us look bad and gives our future citizens something to live down |
Foreign Policy › War on ISIS
4>4 Personal answeronly I f we mean to win - overwhelmingly and immediately - followed by a "Marshal Plan" to rebuild the area to prevent future conflict - and full free birth control for women - and full political rights for women - All or Nothing |
Science › Space Exploration
4>4 Personal answerYes, drastically increase budget and along with travel - much, much more for remote (robotic) exploration. Willful ignorance of the vastness of the heavens is death for our adventurous species. |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
4>4 Personal answerThey can put it on the Moon for all I care. Set up US rules so "offshore" money flows into the US economy. It's a global economy and we ought to track all investments - like the billions in illegal drug, weapon and human trafficking trades. Tax that and use the vast sums to free the oppressed. |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
4>4 Personal answerCongress could not audit a community college course in basic math. They'd be clueless. |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerhave they ever found anything? Post it for all to see |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
4>4 Personal answerpermanent measure to ensure stable prices and ensured food supply (could drop excess dairy - and completely stop the practice of maize into alcohol fuel - bad energy loss and wastes scare top soil - and uses far too much petrochems) |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
4>4 Personal answerlike without getting into another major war? Let Queen Pupinia Stewart take down Vinny Pudding. |
the Economy › Property Taxes
4>4 Personal answersales taxes are inherently regressive - soak the poor while the rich hardly notice go after the top 1% who own 99% of everything. Go after those with the money, not after the oppressed. |
the Economy › Pension Reform
4>4 Personal answerNo, privately managed accounts will jeopardize the financial security of senior citizens |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answertotal scam - currency with no legal backing is pyramid monopoly money fiction - they should be shut down as a gambling den |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.