Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-life |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerNo, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage |
the Economy › Equal Pay
4>4 Personal answerNo, but such knowledge including the value of ancillary benefits should be posted to let the free market decide who to work with. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerNo, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law |
Social › Gender Identity
4>4 Personal answerNo, there are only two genders which are genetically not psychologically determined |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for a very narrow series of non-essential businesses (e.g. Jewish-run meat store and Hindu with anti-Israel bumper sticker asking for pork) with competitors who will accept them. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerNo, but heavily scrutinize those from high-risk countries with low identity verification unless they can be guaranteed to not be a risk. Coptic Christians fleeing ISIS during the ongoing genocide should be given less scrutiny than, say, Shiite Muslims leaving Syria or Iran while in a safer area. |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
4>4 Personal answerNo, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
4>4 Personal answerNo, the wage is already causing jobs to migrate overseas to those with a smaller cost of production and fewer regulations. The latter might be even more costly to jobs in some industries. |
the Environment › Climate Change
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
4>4 Personal answerNo, private businesses should decide the amount of competitive incentives they offer to employees instead of a government mandate |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerYes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants |
Education › Student Loans
4>4 Personal answerNo, and transition all current government student loans into privately managed accounts |
Immigration › Immigration
4>4 Personal answerYes, but it should not grant their parents citizenship- perhaps conditional residency in some cases. |
Social › Death Penalty
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerAllow research of potential medical uses and follow standard FDA drug evaluation procedures for those who might benefit from cannabis oil and derivative products. If successful, it would drop to a Class B drug instead of a Class A and reduce penalties for future abusers of the THC content per the medical process and process of law. |
Social › Government Mandates
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Confederate Flag
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only at historical monuments where it was originally flown |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerYes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Medicaid
4>4 Personal answerNo, and each state should decide their own level of coverage |
Immigration › Border Security
4>4 Personal answerNo, just enforce the current border policy |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
4>4 Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Voter Fraud
4>4 Personal answerYes, this will prevent voter fraud |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
4>4 Personal answerYes, allow residency (not citizenship) after a tax and an annual fee for non-criminals (barring immigration offenses) until they go through the legal process- if they can prove that they were employed and did not conspire to obtain taxpayer money/ benefits (food stamps, subsidized housing) save ones that they had no control over (subsidized water, public transportation). |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
4>4 Personal answerYes, but limit the scope of the government’s powers |
the Economy › Government Spending
4>4 Personal answerYes, and increase taxes |
Foreign Policy › Israel
4>4 Personal answerYes, and with more aid and support |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
4>4 Personal answerYes, but the government should provide free language learning courses |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
4>4 Personal answerNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
4>4 Personal answerYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model |
Social › First Amendment
4>4 Personal answerNo, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
4>4 Personal answerNo, but it is currently being overused |
Social › Euthanasia
4>4 Personal answerNo, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerIncrease, our economy relies on businesses hiring the highest skilled workers at the lowest cost |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
4>4 Personal answerNo, and minority groups should not receive any favorable treatment |
the Economy › Labor Unions
4>4 Personal answerHurt, I support some private unions but am strongly against public unions |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
4>4 Personal answerYes, and deregulate the energy sector to let the free market determine the best energy sources |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
4>4 Personal answerNo, increasing the capital gains tax will limit investment in our economy |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
4>4 Personal answerNo, but if they can pay their way- let them. Don't give them special benefits for breaking the law. |
Education › Common Core
4>4 Personal answerYes, I support the concept but not the current implementation |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
4>4 Personal answerYes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests |
Healthcare › Obamacare
4>4 Personal answerNo, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs |
the Environment › Fracking
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
4>4 Personal answerYes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Torture
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only if they are convicted terrorists |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Drones
4>4 Personal answerYes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
4>4 Personal answerYes, people are now living longer than when the program was created |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
4>4 Personal answerNo, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture |
Foreign Policy › War on ISIS
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should not legitimize ISIS as a sovereign entity |
Science › Space Exploration
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
4>4 Personal answerNo, in order to stabilize our financial system, it must remain independent of Congressional oversight |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only on ambivalent allies and not if it can be easily discovered unless deemed prudent. |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilize prices |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should let the Russians take out ISIS |
the Economy › Property Taxes
4>4 Personal answerNo, but decrease tax rates for senior citizens |
the Economy › Pension Reform
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answerNo, classify it as a commodity |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
4>4 Personal answerNo, there are too many hidden provisions in this specific agreement |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.