A fierce international debate has emerged over whether Israel's military campaign in Gaza should be labeled as 'genocide.' Scholars, journalists, and human rights advocates are deeply divided, with some citing evidence of mass civilian casualties, destruction, and deprivation as meeting the legal definition of genocide, while others argue that the term is being misapplied and risks diluting its meaning. The controversy is fueled by high-profile op-eds, academic interventions, and mounting calls for accountability amid ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. The debate has significant political implications, affecting international relations, public opinion, and potential legal proceedings. As the conflict continues, the world is grappling with both the reality on the ground and the power of language to shape global responses.
اس عام گفتگو جواب دینے والے پہلے شخص بنیں۔