I’m saying that if we do teach creationism, it’s from standpoint of historical context, not as an actual scientific theory, not because it’s controversial, but because it’s not scientific. That wouldn’t be begging the question, that’s stating the obvious. There is no scientific basis behind creationism besides what the Bible (a 2,000 year old book with little evidence it was actually written by the instruction of a god) states, and that is not a basis for a scientific model. Evolution on the other hand has been researched for centuries, and has basis, as shown by Charles Darwin and his experimentation with the animals on the Galápagos Islands. If one biases the entire scientific process in America towards a theory with no proof but an old book, then we lose a lot of scientific credibility, not to mention, that religion wasn’t supposed to conflict with the development of scientific ideals in the first place.
For gay marriage, I am saying that the majority of the population would disapprove of that idea, and that regardless, it affects no one negatively to let consenting people above 18 marry. Who does it hurt? How is it a crime? Why does a singular religion get to decide the fate of those who don’t believe it? Even if sodomy isn’t necessarily moral, it is a victimless “crime” and should still be allowed to happen, as the choices consenting individuals make (as long as hand is not done) are of no concern to me, you, or anyone else
Bu yorum yap ilk yanıtlayan siz olun.