While I do support animal rights, and definitely think it should be limited and heavily regulated to life saving research, preferably as non-invasive as possible, subjecting any human to that kind of treatment is completely contrary to the right to not be subject to cruel and unusual punishment. Not only that, but who do you think this would really affect? Murderers, rapists, and pedophiles; or wrongly convicted individuals and minorities? Personally it depresses me that an animal had to suffer for us to progress in life saving care. But if I were to compare the amount of poor innocent animal lives that are subject to this kind of treatment, and the amount of innocent people who were saved or even cured because of the sacrifice of these animals, then I would argue that the benefits outweigh the loss.
เป็นคนแรกที่ ตอบกลับ การ ความไม่เห็นด้วย นี้