These "nicer" forms of capitalism, called Social Democracies, only aim to temporarily alleviate the inherent, structural problems of capitalism; they only offer band-aid solutions of limited social safety net improvements to avoid addressing the root cause of the inequality: private capital ownership controlling our production and distribution of resources for personal profits.
Now, I am not opposed to gradual change in ultimately dismantling such systems of exploitation, if need be, but the problem is that we aren't doing that either. Even the most "progressive" of social democracies are still fundamentally capitalist, and as such, are still designed to preserve and maintain the interests of capital and the power that private owners hold over economic decision-making, something that conservatives fight to defend. The problem is that conservatism does not advocate for the gradual change or implementation of progressive systems, they fight for the complete preservation of the status quo and the elimination of any movement that proposes changing it. If we actually did institute gradual changes, with the common goal of abolishing and replacing current exploitative systems, then it would be okay, but we aren't.
เป็นคนแรกที่ ตอบกลับ การ ความไม่เห็นด้วย นี้