More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income (over $200K) voters
Last answered 2 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income (over $200K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by sciencealert.com.au
6 years ago by deccanchronicle.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by cnsnews.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, to create jobs- but no, and maintain our current ones but keep a limit to up keep the environment. 6 years ago from a Republican in Wooldridge, MO
Yes,expand offshore drilling and other enery assets we possess in this country to include coal, but also promote and give incentives to the private sector to develop alternate energy sources and let the market dictate and choose it's preferences. 6 years ago from a Republican in Fulton, CA
Yes but must be very carefully regulated. 6 years ago from a Republican in Pleasanton, CA
YES, but in shallow water, not too deep. 6 years ago from a Republican in Brookline, MA
Use our own oil, instead of borrowing from other countries. At the same time, alternative fuels must be developed. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Dover, NJ
Yes, but limit expansion. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Owens Cross Roads, AL
We studied all the ethanol, we dont need to disrupt the natural world. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Columbia, MO
We should re-energize the EPA more diligently appreciate environmental impact and to balance those risks against the incremental benefits from particular environmental invasions while also significantly incentivizing development of alternate energy sources. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Bellaire, TX
No, offshore oil drilling should stop, because sea creatures were meant to live in peace in their home. Earth is our home, I'm sure we wouldn't know what to do if our home was being destroyed. we would run, but we would mostly ask for a chance... 6 years ago from a Green in Prather, CA
Yes, but with regulation that makes oil companies fully responsible for any big oil spill doesn't happen again. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Chevy Chase, DC