More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($75K-$100K) voters
Last answered 30 seconds ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($75K-$100K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by sciencealert.com.au
6 years ago by deccanchronicle.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by cnsnews.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Don't add anymore offshore oil drilling and when oil is depleted in that location then remove the oil rigs. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Riverview, FL
Nationalize the energy sector and develop alternative forms of energy. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lemon Grove, CA
Yes but must be very carefully regulated. 6 years ago from a Republican in Pleasanton, CA
Use our own oil, instead of borrowing from other countries. At the same time, alternative fuels must be developed. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Dover, NJ
We have enough resources in our country to make our own energy to not have to rely on foreign countries for our energy. 6 years ago from a Republican in Barre, VT
With extremely strict environmental, technical, structural, and operational oversight by the Federal government, it can be done safely, however the penalties for damages to the environment need to be FAR higher. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Raritan, NJ
The key is that the oil companies are private enterprises. Opening up offshore drilling will not necessarily help America as private companies are already exporting much of the U.S. "harvested" oil for a better price which is only profits for... 6 years ago from a Republican in New Baltimore, MI
Yes, the more oil we can gain, the less it will cost. Supply and Demand. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Douglassville, PA
Yes, as long as regulations are met to keep the environment and workers safe. 6 years ago from a Republican in The Dalles, OR
We should re-energize the EPA more diligently appreciate environmental impact and to balance those risks against the incremental benefits from particular environmental invasions while also significantly incentivizing development of alternate energy sources. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Bellaire, TX
Yes, but only if the standards required for off-shore drilling are set and maintained far better than allowing oil companies to lie in environmental impact reports (especially about their ability to contain a spill and provide for recovery). 6 years ago from a Green in Bloomington, CA
Yes, but oil spill cleanup should not be a tax break, this should be an after-tax deduction from profits on top of all costs for the cleanup and compensation. 6 years ago from a Green in Huntingdon, PA