Abortion is a medical procedure resulting in the termination of a human pregnancy and death of a fetus. Abortion was banned in 30 states until the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade. The ruling made abortion legal in all 50 states but gave them regulatory powers over when abortions could be performed during a pregnancy. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade in the case Dobbs v. Jackson. The court ruled that the substantive right to abortion was not “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history or tradition”, nor considered a right when the Due Process Clause was ratified in 1868.
61% Pro-choice |
39% Pro-life |
51% Pro-choice |
32% Pro-life |
4% Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
7% Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child |
4% Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it |
0% Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest |
2% Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months |
See how support for each position on “Abortion” has changed over time for 26.8m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Abortion” has changed over time for 26.8m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@4RZFDJG3yrs3Y
If the Father of the unborn child is willing and capable of caring for the child and wants to assume legal custody of child and is a fit parent, I feel he should have an equal say in the decision. There should be rights for Fathers who are able and willing.
I think this may encourage people to be more thoughtful about intimacy. I believe Men should have a say in the decision of the termination of their unborn child.
I also believe in required counseling before and after abortion as it often leads to eventual traumatic disorders and depression.
@8LY3TR93yrs3Y
I am pro life but if you are raped, then you can have a abortion but if your were stupid and had sex at a young age then don't abort it.
@5928RG73yrs3Y
End all programs, no abortive procedures period. Lock up all doctors, nurses, staff of any facility that participated in any abortive acts. I want stiff penalties for medical staff and go after any women who have had an abortion and grandfathering it. For each abortion 15 years to life it is premeditated murder not only for the woman also the man that impregnated her!!!!!!!!!!
@5MBK6ZX3yrs3Y
I'm personally against it but strongly believe that it's just like the presidential election, if you don't vote you can't say anything. If you disagree with abortion what are you going to do to help those kids who didn't get aborted and are now in foster homes? If you're going to be against it, do something to help. Adopt that baby of the mother you judged for wanting an abortion.
@528MY4M3yrs3Y
I do not agree with a helpless human life being ended purely because of any unfortunate circumstance which may have created that life. But I DO NOT agree that my beliefs should be FORCED upon another. Let each make their choices until science can factually determine when life begins.
@4VXBP8Q3yrs3Y
Abortion should be mandatory for anyone with an IQ under 120.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Abortion” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH2 days2D
In Arizona, a fierce battle over abortion rights is unfolding, with the state's historic 1864 abortion ban at the center of controversy. As lawmakers gear up for a critical vote that could potentially repeal the ban, the political landscape is charged with tension and high stakes. Democrats, now back to full strength in the House, are eyeing the possibility of overturning the archaic law with the support of a few key Republicans. This move comes at a time when abortion rights are under intense scrutiny across the United States, making Arizona's upcoming decision a focal point in the national debate.The 1864 abortion ban, which has remained on the books for over a century, has become a symbol of the broader struggle between conservative and progressive forces in Arizona. With the balance of power delicately poised, the outcome of the vote could hinge on a handful of legislators willing to cross party lines. The potential for change has ignited passions on both sides, with advocates for women's rights pushing for the repeal, while conservative voices, including influential figures like Cathi Herrod, warn Republicans against such a move.The dynamics within the Arizona Legislature reflect a broader national trend, where abortion rights are increasingly becoming a litmus test for political allegiance. The debate in Arizona is not just about the 1864 ban itself, but what it represents in the context of today's polarized political climate. As the vote approaches, all eyes are on the state, with its decision poised to send ripples across the country.Despite the mounting pressure, many Republican lawmakers remain steadfast in their opposition to repealing the ban. The entrenched positions on both sides underscore the deep divisions that exist not just in Arizona, but across the United States, as the country grapples with the complex and emotive issue of abortion rights. The outcome of Arizona's vote will not only determine the future of abortion access in the state but could also influence the national conversation around reproductive rights.As the debate intensifies, the people of Arizona are faced with a historic decision that could redefine the state's stance on abortion. With the potential to overturn a law that has stood for over 150 years, the upcoming vote is a testament to the enduring struggle for women's rights and the ever-evolving landscape of American politics. Regardless of the outcome, Arizona's battle over abortion rights is a reminder of the ongoing fight for autonomy and justice in the face of deeply entrenched political ideologies.
@ISIDEWITH3 days3D
As the United States gears up for a series of pivotal elections and ballot initiatives, the issue of abortion rights has emerged as a central battleground, with states taking divergent paths in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to leave abortion regulation up to individual states. From Florida to Colorado and Arizona, voters are being faced with amendments and legislative proposals that could significantly alter access to abortion services in their states. In Florida, an abortion-rights amendment is struggling to gain the necessary support, indicating a deeply divided electorate on this contentious issue. Meanwhile, Colorado's Proposition 89, which seeks to enshrine abortion access in the state's constitution, has sparked fierce opposition from anti-abortion activists, highlighting the polarized nature of the debate.In Arizona, political dynamics are shifting as Republicans, who once championed stringent abortion bans, are now reconsidering their stance in light of potential ballot measures and public opinion. The state's abortion policies are under scrutiny, with some GOP members advocating for more moderate restrictions in an attempt to find common ground with voters. This recalibration reflects the complex interplay between political strategy and the deeply personal convictions that drive the abortion debate.The implications of these state-level battles extend far beyond the immediate policy outcomes. They are indicative of a broader national struggle over reproductive rights, with potential consequences for the 2024 presidential election and beyond. As candidates and parties navigate the treacherous waters of abortion politics, they are forced to confront not only the legal and ethical dimensions of the issue but also the strategic calculations that could determine their electoral fortunes.The unfolding drama over abortion rights in the United States underscores the profound impact of the Supreme Court's decision to decentralize the issue. As states chart their own courses, the patchwork of policies that emerges will likely fuel ongoing debates and legal challenges. For voters, the stakes are high, as the outcome of these elections and ballot initiatives will shape the landscape of reproductive rights for years to come, making the issue of abortion not just a matter of personal belief but a pivotal factor in the nation's political trajectory.
@ISIDEWITH5 days5D
In the heated run-up to the United States Senate elections, abortion rights have surged to the forefront of campaign debates, signaling a pivotal shift in the political landscape. Candidates from both sides of the aisle are recalibrating their positions on this divisive issue, reflecting its potential to sway voters in critical battleground states. Among the most notable shifts is that of Kari Lake, a Republican Senate hopeful, whose recent adjustment in stance has sparked controversy and accusations of political opportunism from opponents. Ruben Gallego, a Democrat and Lake's rival, has accused her of lying about her newfound position on abortion, emphasizing the significance of Arizona's Civil War-era law in the current political discourse.The debate over abortion rights, particularly in the context of Arizona's antiquated 1864 law, underscores the issue's capacity to influence election outcomes. Both parties are keenly aware of the changing public sentiment on abortion, with recent polls indicating a growing support for reproductive rights among the electorate. This shift has prompted candidates to reconsider their strategies, with some Republicans softening their previously hardline anti-abortion stances in response to declining poll numbers.The criticism from within the Republican ranks further highlights the internal conflict over the party's approach to abortion. Russell Moore, editor-in-chief of the evangelical magazine Christianity Today, has publicly criticized some Republicans for their lack of a coherent moral vision on the issue, accusing them of being pro-life with exceptions only when it suits their political interests. This critique underscores the broader challenges facing the Republican Party as it grapples with how to address abortion in a way that resonates with both its base and the wider electorate.As the election season heats up, abortion rights are poised to remain a central issue, with candidates on both sides attempting to navigate the complex and evolving landscape. The outcome of these races could have significant implications for the future of abortion rights in the United States, making it a critical issue for voters to watch in the coming months.The intensifying focus on abortion in the Senate races reflects a broader national conversation about reproductive rights, signaling a potentially transformative moment in American politics. As candidates refine their positions and strategies, the electorate will be closely watching, ready to cast their votes in what promises to be a defining issue in the upcoming elections.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The Israel-Hamas war is an armed conflict between Israel and Hamas militant groups that has been taking place in and around the Gaza strip since October 7 2023. The conflict started when Hamas militant groups fired rockets and attacked communities and military bases in southern Israel. 1,139 people…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual…
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
Artificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible for machines to learn from experience, adjust to new inputs and perform human-like tasks. Lethal autonomous weapons systems use artificial intelligence to identify and kill human targets without human intervention. Russia, the United States and China have…
@ISIDEWITH12mos12MO
In 2023 Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch were criticized after news articles revealed they had personal financial transactions with people who had interest in court decisions. Politico reported that Justice Gorsuch sold a vacation property to the CEO of a prominent law firm which…