More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Race (Other) voters
Last answered 2 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Race (Other) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 30, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Race data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by catholicnewsagency.com
5 years ago by net.au
6 years ago by news.com.au
6 years ago by bbc.co.uk
6 years ago by dailymail.co.uk
6 years ago by net.au
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
After seeing the Bo
llywood movie Guzaarish http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1438298/ it's clear the patient should be TERMINALLY ILL, not just willing to give up life when not classified as terminal. 6 years ago from a Republican in Bakersfield, CA
To leave it up to government would have both parties checking out who is in that situation. Democrats will use compassion in any actions. Republicans...If you're a Democrat goodby sweety. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lawrence, MA
Who are we to tell people to suffer more if they so choose not to suffer until their terminal illness kills them?. 6 years ago from a Republican in Queen Creek, AZ
If someone chooses to end there life by injection they can but they must wait at least a week for them to think about before there final answer. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Kennewick, WA
If they are in lots of pain and are on their death bead. 6 years ago from a Republican in Las Vegas, NV
Not my decision. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Conroe, TX
Yes, but only if the patient is in a sound mental state and makes the decision them self. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Piedmont, CA
No. But should be allowed to make fundamental decisions on how to die, with assistance of the medical profession, family and other care givers. Such as refuse heroic intervention, food, etc. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Pasadena, CA
If you have never faced this with a close friend or relative, I'm not sure one should take a stand on this. Pain relief must be available even if the body eventually isn't able to tolerate the drug. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Fort Wayne, IN
This is between patient, condition and doctors/hospital staff. All circumstances pointing to prolonging a terminally ill is individual; should be offered to those who choose/require it. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Elmwood Park, IL
Yes after psychological exam and investigation of financial motives of family. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Garland, TX
I firmly believe that anyone that decides to end their life (terminally ill or otherwise) should have that choice. Who are we to decide someone's fate? As long as they don't take anyone with them it should be THEIR choice. Not the Government or... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Rochester, NY
As long as absolutely no one assist you, then suicide should not be illegal. 6 years ago from a Republican in Springdale, AR
No because it would require doctors to kill their patients. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Chicago, IL
This is an issue that should not be answered by mere logic. Although, I agree it is horrible for a human to suffer, there suffering should be eased as much as possible, but to say it is up to us to take their life is a hard question and decision. 6 years ago from a Republican in Sweetwater, TX