+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.1k Congressional District 7 voters.

81%
Yes
19%
No
81%
Yes
19%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.1k Congressional District 7 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.1k Congressional District 7 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Congressional District 7 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RJH6B8  from Texas  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, while ensuring ethical research that does not lead to supporting ideals such as selective reproduction or eugenics

  @clbcarman answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only to treat agreed-upon classified diseases, as going beyond this is a slippery slope to eugenics.

 @9TM97YS from Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

Yes but they need to be very careful and only use research for diseases because this could easily lead to dark places like eugenics.

 @9QT5LY3  from Texas  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, however only after ensuring their is no risks in doing so and also at the consent of the people

 @9WCWFBK from Ohio  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, so long as the general public are not subject to it without their consent or knowledge. Fluoridation and its origin being a good example as to why health being in the hands of the federal government with the absolute final say is a bad idea.

 @9PPZHFZ from South Carolina  answered…11mos11MO

 @9S739LH from Tennessee  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, however the government should also fund programs for lifestyle changes that can help to prevent and treat diseases

 @9ZGX9KJ  from Ohio  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, while ensuring ethical research does not lead to supporting ideals such as selective reproduction or eugenics.