More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Right voters
Last answered 2 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Right voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
4 years ago by thefreethoughtproject.com
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
5 years ago by afr.com
5 years ago by smh.com.au
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
5 years ago by bbc.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Death Penalty
The death penalty or capital punishment is the punishment by death for a crime. Currently 58 countries worldwide allow the death penalty (including the U.S.) while 97 countries have outlawed it. See recent death penalty news
More stances on this issue
Maybe. If the accused has done a heinous crime that was merciless, very harsh, and that has taken the lives of one or many people that are innocent, then maybe yes, but all men are created equal which is stated in the constitution. So as an alternative,... 5 years ago from a Republican in Palm City, FL
Allow the convicted the option. 5 years ago from a Republican in Greeneville, TN
I always believe in the Verse "An eye for an eye." If they are TRULY GUILTY of rape murder then they should be killed. Why should the tax payers keep them alive...we pay for them to eat, shower, roof over head, AC and heating, list continues on!. 5 years ago from a Republican in Rescue, VA
If one murders a child,elderly person or a disabled person. also if one tortures or sexually assaults victims before killing them. 5 years ago from a Republican in Ozark, AL
Yes only when evidence is indisputable. 5 years ago from a Republican in Toledo, OH
Yes but should be able to use the body parts no electrocution or lethal injection at least some good could come from the execution. 5 years ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS
Only if the criminals are minorities. 5 years ago from a Republican in Venice, CA
DNA evidence has shown that wrong people are sometimes imprisoned or executed. It should be allowed only if there is more than circumstantial evidence to make a conviction. 5 years ago from a Republican in East Meadow, NY
Life in prison for heinous crimes; more suffering. 5 years ago from a Republican in Lexington, SC
No, but murderers should have HARD LABOR sentences (no internet). 5 years ago from a Republican in Coyote, CA
They should have to suffer in jail until they die and not have any chnace of getting out EVER!! Death is too easy they don't have to think about what they have done and an eye for an eye isn't effective. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Forest Grove, OR
For only first degree murders-multiple offenses, excluding felony murders, even if a police officer is the victim. Public servants should not have special rules of punishment. States are the best to determine death penalty laws. 5 years ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS
Yes, but special care should be taken to remove the arbitrary and seemingly way it is practiced today. 5 years ago from a Republican in Fairport, NY