Junk fees are hidden and unexpected charges that are often not included in the initial or listed price of a transaction but are added on at the time of the payment. Airlines, hotels, concert ticket providers and banks often add them onto the cost of a service or good after the consumer has seen the original price. Proponents of the rule argue that getting rid of these fees will make prices more transparent for consumers and save them money. Opponents argue that private businesses would simply raise prices in response to the regulations and there isn’t a guarantee that flying or staying in a hotel would be any less expensive.
57% Yes |
35% No |
57% Yes |
22% No |
5% No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases |
|
4% No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers |
|
2% No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees |
|
2% No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead |
See how support for each position on “Surcharge Ban” has changed over time for 6.8k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Surcharge Ban” has changed over time for 6.8k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9FDPB3L7mos7MO
Yes, and include taxes and other fees into the advertised price, and ban tipping as well.
@9GZDTYY5mos5MO
No, the government should not regulate what private business charge their consumers and should focus more on preventing monopolies and cartels, but the government should place higher taxes on surcharges tacked onto purchases than regular sales to discourage them.
@9L3MGJ6 4wks4W
No, but it should mandate greater transparency (e.g., banning the practice of not including surcharges in prices shown to potential buyers, or not showing customers the full price until checkout)
@9KHD9C82mos2MO
No. Keep gov't out of business. However, all costs should be included in the final price, nothing hidden. Eventually the market will decide and the business will either succeed or fail.
@9K9Z8HX2mos2MO
It would most likely not be cheaper, but we would know what we are paying up front. Transparency is only fair.
@9JYYZN8 2mos2MO
To be honest I'm not really sure, I can see both sides of this question and I don't really know which one to choose.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
An embryo is an initial stage of development of a multicellular organism. In humans, embryonic development is the part of the life cycle that begins just after fertilization of the female egg cell by the male sperm cell. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a process of fertilization where an egg is combined…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual…
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y