In 2021 the U.S. Border Patrol reported 1,659,206 encounters with migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, narrowly exceeding the prior highs of 1,643,679 in 2000 and 1,615,844 in 1986. The Border Patrol reported 608,037 encounters with Mexican nationals in 2021, accounting for 37% of the total. The remaining 1,051,169 encounters, or 63%, involved people from countries other than Mexico – by far the highest total for non-Mexican nationals in CBP records dating back to 2000. Congress has passed at least four laws since 1986 authorizing increases in Border Patrol personnel. The number of bor…
Read more71% Yes |
29% No |
67% Yes |
17% No |
4% Yes, and allow border states to manage their own security policy |
6% No, make it easier for immigrants to access temporary work visas |
5% No, just enforce the current border policy |
|
1% No, and we should implement an open border policy |
See how support for each position on “Border Security” has changed over time for 15.8m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Border Security” has changed over time for 15.8m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8FYQYQH4yrs4Y
No, and we should implement an open border policy, but with background checks
@9D437JK9mos9MO
Yes and decrease the price of the immigration process
@92QY7WF2yrs2Y
No, just end the welfare state
@4Y4S97J3yrs3Y
Yes but set refugee camps close to border to help people that had to leave their home because of danger
@566G5R23yrs3Y
Close the borders completely with 30 foot tall electrified walls with missile turrets
@4XV4YPV3yrs3Y
Yes, I also believe border security should be a part of the U.S. Military.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Border Security” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH10hrs10H
Senate Republicans on Friday unveiled a plan to require that the Department of Homeland Security receive notification of any illegal alien attempt to purchase a firearm."Those who come into America illegally should be detained and deported," Arkansas GOP Sen. Tom Cotton said in a press release. "They certainly shouldn’t be able to purchase a firearm. Our bill is necessary to ensure the proper authorities are notified when an illegal immigrant attempts to buy a gun."Under the plan, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would receive notification when an illegal alien fails a background check while attempting to purchase a firearm. It is already illegal for an illegal alien to purchase a firearm and 2022 witnessed almost 4,400 failed background checks due to the would-be purchaser's unlawful presence in the country, according to the Washington Times.
@ISIDEWITH4 days4D
In an unprecedented move that has captivated the nation, the United States Senate is poised to address the impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, marking a significant moment in American political history. Mayorkas, who became the first cabinet secretary in nearly 150 years to be impeached in February, faces charges that have sparked intense debate across the political spectrum. Democrats have vehemently criticized the impeachment as a political maneuver, while Republicans argue it's a necessary response to what they see as Mayorkas's failures in office, particularly regarding border security.Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has been vocal in his support for the impeachment trial, promising to oppose any attempts by Democrats to dismiss the charges outright. This stance underscores the deep divisions within the Senate and sets the stage for a contentious trial process. Meanwhile, the House of Representatives is navigating its own legislative priorities, including foreign aid votes that have been overshadowed by the looming impeachment trial.The accusations against Mayorkas, particularly from figures such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, have been severe, with some labeling his actions as treasonous due to alleged dereliction of duty at the southern border. These claims, which include accusations of collusion with non-governmental organizations to finance illegal immigration, have fueled the fire of the impeachment debate.As the Senate prepares to undertake this historic trial, the nation watches closely. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the Biden administration and the political landscape ahead of the upcoming election cycle. With both sides of the aisle gearing up for a fierce battle, the Mayorkas impeachment trial is not just about the fate of one man, but about the broader issues of immigration policy, executive accountability, and the political use of impeachment as a tool.Regardless of the outcome, this trial is a testament to the deeply polarized state of American politics. It serves as a reminder of the challenges facing the nation's leaders as they navigate the complexities of governance, partisanship, and the expectations of the American people. As the Senate moves forward, all eyes will be on this historic impeachment trial, its conduct, and its consequences for the future of American democracy.
@ISIDEWITH4 days4D
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) announced Tuesday he will co-sponsor a resolution to oust Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) from the House’s top job.Massie told his colleagues during a closed-door conference meeting that he will co-sponsor the motion to vacate resolution filed late last month by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), according to three GOP lawmakers in the room, becoming the first lawmaker to publicly join Greene’s effort.Massie’s announcement came less than 24 hours after Johnson unveiled the outline of a plan to move foreign aid through the House, which includes voting on three separate bills to send assistance to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan and a fourth measure that pertains to other national security priorities.But in a departure from his previous positions, Johnson did not include border security provisions in the plan after months of Republicans — including the Speaker — demanding that any aid for Ukraine be paired with legislation to address the situation at the southern border, sparking intense opposition among conservatives.Speaking to reporters after Tuesday’s meeting, Massie referenced Johnson’s decision to put Ukraine aid on the floor — in addition to his handling of government funding and the reauthorization of the U.S.’s warrantless surveillance authority — to explain why he is now backing the ouster effort.“There’s only one person right now who could stop us from going into what happened last fall, and that’s Mike Johnson,” Massie said, referring to the ouster of former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) in October.“He’s cleaning the barn, that’s obvious,” he continued. “He had three things to do: He wanted to do an omnibus that broke all the spending records, he wanted to do FISA without warrants, now he wants to do Ukraine. Those are the three things. There are people riding him like a horse here; they don’t care when the horse collapses — I do, because it’s gonna throw our conference into turmoil.”The Kentucky Republican said he asked Johnson to resign from the Speakership during the closed-door conference meeting, which the Louisiana Republican declined to do.ohnson responded to the growing ouster effort on Tuesday, calling it “absurd.”“I am not resigning and it is, in my view, an absurd notion that someone would bring a vacate motion when we are simply here trying to do our jobs,” Johnson said at a press conference in the Capitol. “It is not helpful to the cause, it is not helpful to the country, it does not help the House Republicans advance our agenda which is in the best interest of the American people here — a secure border, sound governance — and it’s not helpful to the unity that we have in the body.”Both Greene and Massie have declined to say when they might trigger a vote on the motion-to-vacate resolution, but the support from the pair of conservatives means Johnson will more than likely need Democratic support to remain Speaker if the issue comes to the floor.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH3wks3W
In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.
@ISIDEWITH11yrs11Y