More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (Single) voters
Last answered 2 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (Single) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 9, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
6 years ago by rt.com
6 years ago by net.au
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by nytimes.com
6 years ago by net.au
6 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
In a safer form, not in its current poisonous form. We shouldn't be leaving buried chemicals in the ground that will eventually seep into water supplies. In fact, why are they using the poisonous chemicals that they use now anyways, when they have... 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Huntsville, TX
I love the job creation and economic growth it's creating, but am very concerned about the long-term effects and lack of disclosure regarding the process. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Berea, OH
I support hydraulic fracking in the U.S., ONLY, if it is AMERICAN OWNED interests doing it.
I am against foreign corps. (the Chinese) performing this here. 7 years ago from a Republican in Norwich, NY
Yes, but there needs to be verifiable evidence that it does not harm the ground water sources before it can be used. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Denver, CO
No absolutely not. all current sites should be shut down and completely cleaned up and restore
to its pristine original conditions. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Brisbane, CA
Concerns are based on sound evidence. Companies need to be controlled in their pursuit of oil at the expense of h2o and peoples health. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Venice, FL
No, we would pursue more sustainable energy sources AND it is destroying our environment. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Salt Lake City, UT
Yes, but watching the movie, Gas Land, makes me very bias about regulations. They need to make sure they have high regulations so people cannot light their tap water on fire due to natural gas in their wells. 7 years ago from a Republican in Laona, WI
If there is an earthquake has it been studied in that Fracking could be the cause??? I believe any company who has the potential to endager live such as the last hazardess waste poisoning of water should pay into a cleanup program (which should remain... 7 years ago from a Democrat in Lawrence, MA
Yes, but increase protection for private property in the vicinity and hold businesses liable for any long-term damage to surrounding properties. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Lehman, PA
Yes, but continue to monitor to insure that the practice is safe and the public is not being overtly affected. 7 years ago from a Republican in Tempe, AZ
Fracking should be studied more for it's long term effects. The oil industry has not proved it is environmentally sound.
Lighting tap water on fire says something is amiss.
Ground water is more important. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Tallahassee, FL
I don't know enough about this issue. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Mchenry, IL
I dont know what this means. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Altoona, IA
Allow only with full disclosure and EPA approval of materials and processes employed, away from highly populated areas, and with ample oversight and immediate redress panels. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Denver, CO
Yes, as long as we continue to search for more sustainable practices with rapidity. 7 years ago from a Green in Glenview Nas, IL
Yes, in the instance you own all the property, not simply rights. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Grand Rapids, MI
I don't have enough knowledge of the method to give an opinion at the moment. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Beech Grove, IN
Yes natural resouces, no oil. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Tallahassee, FL
Yes. However, sustainable energy sources need to be researched, so we don't have to drill, which is the real problem. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Tulsa, OK
Not familiar enough with procedure to make an educated guess. 7 years ago from a Republican in Lansing, IL
I support requiring disclosure of the chemicals used in fracking fluids and removing the oil and gas industry exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Brookline, MA
It depends on what liquids are used for the process (e.g., water vs. chemicals). 7 years ago from a Democrat in Long Island City, NY
Yes, but depending upon the depth of the drilling. 7 years ago from a Green in Littleton, CO
Yes, but with tighter regulation, including full disclosure of all chemicals used, strong precautions against groundwater contamination, and prohibition where the risk of mini-earthquakes in populated areas is great. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Austin, TX
Yes, but there should be enforced regulations to prevent environmental damage. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Ingomar, PA
Ok to allow, but continue research on long-term effects. 7 years ago from a Republican in Phoenix, AZ
Yes, as long as we use hydraulic fracking in a way that is safe for the environment. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Gloucester City, PA